Kline, Bachmann signed onto BP “shakedown” lingo

By Paul Schmelzer
Monday, June 21, 2010 at 3:01 pm

MnIndy photo composite

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann — like Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) — has taken plenty of heat for language perceived as supportive of BP, the company behind the colossal oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Bachmann got a surprise grilling from Fox’s Bill O’Reilly for calling the Obama administration’s negotiation for a $20 billion victims fund “extortion.” Barton, who most prominently called the fund a “shakedown,” was shamed into retracting his public apology to BP. But Second District Rep. John Kline has largely dodged criticism for endorsing similar language. Kline and Bachmann are both members of the Republican Study Committee, a group that officially has stated the escrow fund is the result of Obama’s “brand of Chicago-style shakedown politics.”

The RSC statement of last Wednesday seems to have generated little attention in Minnesota, meriting a reference in a Bemidji Pioneer editorial Friday, but few other mentions. But that opinion packed a punch. Citing the RSC opinion on the escrow fund, the editorial board wrote:

There can be no other reason for the opposition than the fact that President Obama supports it.

It’s a sad case when politics colors all your decisions. BP caused the oil spill, and is responsible for stopping it and cleaning up its mess. It’s only fair that it pay for the lost business that accrues from the company’s error of misfortune.

Who’s the greedier? BP or congressional Republicans?

The statement, issued by RSC chair Rep. Tom Price, clearly states BP should be held accountable for the “tragedy” and cleanup, then says that “BP has already begun paying claims.” (On Friday, the House Judiciary Committee reported that BP had paid less than 12 percent of outstanding claims to victims of the spill; it notes that BP has “not paid a single dollar to the individuals or businesses harmed by the [April 20] explosion and the oil spill.”)

Price’s statement continued:

“BP’s reported willingness to go along with the White House’s new fund suggests that the Obama Administration is hard at work exerting its brand of Chicago-style shakedown politics.  These actions are emblematic of a politicization of our economy that has been borne out of this Administration’s drive for greater power and control.  It is the same mentality that believes an economic crisis or an environmental disaster is the best opportunity to pursue a failed liberal agenda.  The American people know much better.”

Bachmann and Kline are among 114 members of the RSC.

Over the weekend, Bachmann was grilled by Fox’s Bill O’Reilly for calling Obama’s securing of victim-relief funds “extortion” and a “shakedown.” “I’m not agreeing with that,” he said of the terminology before stating that “Obama did absolutely the right thing” in negotiating for the funds.

“I’d go in there with a machine gun if I were president and say, ‘Hey, you put that money in here or you’re not getting out of the room,” O’Reilly added. “I think this is the best thing Obama did in the entire mess, getting the $20 billion.”

Kline, as City Pages notes, is Minnesota’s top recipient of campaign contributions from BP, taking in nearly $130,000. Bachmann got the second-largest take from BP, at more than $70,000.

Bachmann will face off with DFL state Sen. Tarryl Clark this fall, while Kline will be challenged by Democrat Dan Powers.

Comments

6 Comments

Chayanov
Comment posted June 21, 2010 @ 4:51 pm

“Who’s the greedier? BP or congressional Republicans?”

That’s a rhetorical question, right?


Mill
Comment posted June 21, 2010 @ 7:29 pm

If Bush did the same thing, they’d call it strong, decisive leadership. But of course, Mr. Bush did no such thing. Subsidies to big oil continued, and the government apparently literally bent over to the industry to accommodate their every interest.

Pathetic. American citizens should matter too, not just big oil.


Amuseinc
Comment posted June 21, 2010 @ 10:53 pm

Not only is Kline a carpet-bagging Texan he is owned lock, stock and barrel by foreign oil interests. Nice… he makes Duke Cunningham look like a clean politician.


ZeraLee
Comment posted June 22, 2010 @ 1:18 am

Republicans have developed the habit of making every problem politically divisive.

If republicans had done something constructive like this, they would be patting themselves on the back, on camera.

Or, they would have thrown the victims to the lawyers and let them go bankrupt over years of litigation while sending the country back into recession. Of course, they would have found ways to blame Democrats for the consequences.


marcus_w71
Comment posted July 9, 2010 @ 8:28 am

It’s good to see that poor, poor BP is being nurtured by the cold milk of John Klein’s teat.. We as American Capitalists MUST understand that $$ 130,000 is much, much more important then oceanic EXTINCTION!! Ugh.. Wow John Klein and Michele Bachmann cost as much as a FUNCTIONING Blow Out Preventer.. Republicans are idiots..


Jim Paulson
Comment posted September 10, 2010 @ 8:50 pm

You clearly missed the mark and the point of Bachmann’s statements about the BP shakedown. And that is exactly what it was — the way it went down.

Bachmann’s point all along was not whether or not BP should be held responsible or not — she never made that statement! The point was then and still is a question: Where is the due process that BP and any other corporation or person has a Right to in America? They didn’t get a day in court before they were told what the price would be. Whether you agree with that principle or not it is the law of the land. So being threatened with a criminal investigation (as Obama threatened to do) or pay $20 billion into an escrow account – all without due process boils down to a mafia shakedown pure and simple.

Bachmann was very clear. She said [due] process matters. It does! She said a victim’s ‘comp’ fund is fine. She further said that not one dime of taxpayers’ money should pay for the damages or clean up. BP should be held accountable for all damages. But it is how you get to that end that is important. It’s the Fifth Amendment — it’s about due process. This is STILL America isn’t it?

For the record, I am not a Republican, but I am a constitutionalist. I do not live in the 6th district either. But I appreciate and support fact over fiction. I do not support half truths or outright lies.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.