European rejection of Obama’s call for stimulus threatens U.S. economy

By David Dagan
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 at 8:10 am

President Obama at the G-20 Summit in Toronto on June 27 (Xinhua/ZUMApress.com)

BERLIN — President Obama’s push for additional economic stimulus is not just hitting a wall in Congress. The president has also been rebuffed by the largest European countries — with potentially profound consequences for the U.S. economy and Obama’s national agenda.

In the run-up to the G-20 summit in late June, the Obama administration went on a PR offensive, urging other wealthy nations to keep pumping stimulus into their economies. But with the Greek budget crisis heightening anxieties over public debt, conservative governments in Berlin, Paris, London and Rome are all on an austerity track. Instead of a pledge to inject more capital into their economies, all Obama got at the Toronto conference was a communique that emphasizes savings over stimulus.

Some economists fret that Europe’s fiscal retreat threatens to tip the U.S. deeper into recession. Meanwhile, leading analysts in Germany, the continent’s largest economy, say the trans-Atlantic spending spat underscores Obama’s limited maneuvering room in his effort to steer the fragile recovery back home.

“America is having enormous difficulties,” said economist Gustav Horn of the Macroeconomic Policy Institute, part of a labor-affiliated foundation in Düsseldorf, Germany. “At the moment, [the U.S.] is dependent on the rest of the world offering it a friendly economic environment.”

For Obama, the environment is less friendly than he would like. In an open letter to other G-20 heads of state before the summit, the president wrote that leaders should “learn from the consequential mistakes of the past when stimulus was too quickly withdrawn.” Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, meanwhile, told the BBC, “Growth in the future around the world can’t depend on the United States as much as it did in the past.”

Some economists warn that austerity in the largest European economies, combined with severe budget cuts in countries such as Greece and Spain, could push the continent into a double-dip recession. If so, the consequences for the U.S. could be severe. A European downturn, Horn said, would hurt American exports, both by lowering demand and by strengthening the dollar. Perhaps more importantly, he added, a stumbling Europe could weaken crucial U.S. trading partners in Asia. Likewise, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman recently warned that the resistance to more stimulus in Europe and the U.S. raises the specter of a depression.

But the dominant view in Germany is that such fears are misguided. Supporters of budget consolidation note the country is on an upswing, with GDP growth expected to reach as high as 2 percent this year as exports accelerate. Moreover, they argue that fiscal retrenchment will spur private-sector spending. A recent report by the Ifo Institute for Economic Research, a Munich-based think tank with government funding, says cuts would lead to an “expansive confidence effect on German consumers and investors.”

The fear that a European slowdown could hurt American trade underscores a more fundamental challenge that German economists say the U.S. must tackle: expanding exports as a source of economic growth.

“Before the crisis, we had a consumption boom in the U.S. that was not sustainable,” said Ifo economist Klaus Abberger. “And so we think there is a need for some redirection.”

That redirection, economists say, will be outward.

“The growth driver you’ve got left is ultimately net exports,” said economist Christian Dreger of the Berlin-based German Institute for Economic Research, another government-funded think tank.

The Obama administration has come to a similar conclusion. In his State of the Union speech in January, the president announced a new initiative to double American exports within five years, though many analysts called the goal unrealistic.

“For too long, America served as the consumer engine for the entire world,” the president said in follow-up remarks in March. “But we’re rebalancing. … Countries with external deficits need to save and export more.”

But the future of U.S. exports is not entirely under American control. The country can only reduce its trade deficit if the rest of the world has sufficient buying power, Horn said. The G-20 has been touting a new initiative to ease trade imbalances, which would require net exporters like Germany to buy more from net importers like the U.S. But it remains to be seen whether there will be any action to follow the talk.

Obama’s inability to induce Europe to boost its stimulus spending is rendered even more discouraging by the limited traction his spending proposals are getting in Congress. And it does not help that Obama is looking increasingly isolated among world leaders in pushing a more expansive fiscal policy.

“You don’t win something in Congress by saying, oh, Europe’s doing this,” said economist Dean Baker, co-director of the left-leaning Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington. “[But] you don’t want the U.S. to look like an outlier.”

The president should not get his hopes up for a hand from Berlin, though. As the Berliner Zeitung newspaper declared of Germany’s chancellor in a recent headline: “Merkel won’t listen to Obama.” The country has a culture of thriftiness to rival even the fiscal-conservative wing of the Republican Party. The traumatic hyperinflation that racked the Weimar Republic during the 1920s has made Germany hyper-sensitive to price stability. The country last year amended its constitution to include limits on government debt. Deep concern that the aging of the population will soon make Germany’s welfare state unaffordable have made people here anxious to get back to budget cutting. Meanwhile, unemployment is lower than in the U.S., so the economic pain is less acute.

Deficit hawks here also argue the turmoil in Greece is a warning to profligate governments across the continent.

“We saw with the Greek crisis how vulnerable highly indebted countries are to [speculative] attack,” said Norbert Barthle, a member of the German parliament from the ruling center-right Christian Democratic Union party (CDU) who specializes in budgeting.

The American economy has managed impressive growth so far this year, but it has largely been driven by the effects of government stimulus, Horn said. And the looming dry-up of stimulus funds around the world amounts to a serious problem for the American president.

“He has to do more if other countries do less,” Horn said. “And in that sense, his worries are absolutely understandable.”

David Dagan is a freelance journalist living in Berlin.

Comments

18 Comments

Dennis
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 9:47 am

“The American economy has managed impressive growth so far this year, but it has largely been driven by the effects of government stimulus, Horn said.”

mmmkay

When even socialist western europe is telling you to quit spending, you know the fraud that is Keynesian economics has been discredited forever.


Eric
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 2:19 pm

Those aren’t socialist governments Dennis. Those are conservative (by European standards) governments which inherited stronger economies than Obama did. If the US economy was doing as well as Germany, we would be talking about debt reduction too. Germany is failing to see itself as part of a bigger unit, and not just itself, which is like an American state thinking about its economy as if it wasn’t part of the US. Be glad Obama learned the lesson of 1937, that austerity measures too soon will stop a recovery.


crohnsguy
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 2:59 pm

The BP oil spill is the big red herring still out there. BP’s involvement in the murky waters of derivatives trading puts them in a perilous place, along with the worldwide economy. No one is talking about that. Too big to fail? BP puts the banks to shame in their size and assets worldwide. A BP implosion could be the “fat tail” event to start the economic collapse once again but on a much grander scale than any of the bailed out banks. The new British PM was dispatched to the White House on the issue. This is big, and no one knows exactly just how big BP’s involvement is, exactly, save for the central banks who aren’t talking.


Thomas Butler
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 3:22 pm

Let me see – who should I listen to? Dennis a known dumb guy who writes dumb things – or Paul Krugman a Nobel Prize winner?

Sorry Dennis – I think I’ll listen to somebody who knows what he’s talking about.


CUT THE MILITARY
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 3:42 pm

Simply cut the military over bloated budget, tax corporations for real, and stop allowing the rich to hide their money in foreign banks , and the debt will disappear. Don’t cut social spending unless your a tory.


Dennis
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 6:14 pm

Tom, Krugman deserved his Nobel Prize even less than Obama deserved his.

Krugman has been reduced to defending his nonsensical Keynesian economics by claiming our $11 trillion debt isn’t big enough. Good luck convincing the people with that argument.


marcus_w71
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 6:34 pm

Oh yeah Dennis.. Mc/Palin would have saved us.. You douche bag “baggers” couldn’t find your balls with a crotch sniffing bloodhound.. Obama was handed a time bomb in a bag of sh1t.. When a Repulitard fails a Repulitard has ultimately succeeded.. That’s your motto.. You idiots call yourself “Patriots” yet you hate our Government.. Move back to Texas ..


Thomas Butler
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 7:04 pm

Dennis –

Again – dumb guy vs internationally recognized smart guy.

Gotta go with Krugman.


Matt
Comment posted July 6, 2010 @ 8:54 pm

The article says the economic recovery is a fraud and will end when the government stops putting all this on credit. What exactly have Obama, Pelosi, & Reid accomplished? Nothing because the government can’t generate real production without taking it from somebody else.


Dennis
Comment posted July 7, 2010 @ 8:39 am

I don’t blame you for not recognizing the truth, Tom. I blame the NEA.


John
Comment posted July 7, 2010 @ 12:56 pm

Dennis

You say that Obama is wrong for using the stimulus plans to help keep our economy floating. What then should we be doing instead? Allow major corporations the freedom to act as they wish? Strip all regulations that exist right now? Please show me one major company that has stepped up and done anything to help our unemployed workers. Libertarians and tea baggers bank on the fact that the majority of their followers are either uneducated idiots or complete asses that would rather loose their own job and home than see their neighbors get any government help.


Thomas Butler
Comment posted July 7, 2010 @ 3:25 pm

Dennis –

You just go ahead living in your Rush Limbaugh/Glen Beck world. Nobody takes you seriously anymore.
The rest of us will muddle through and try figure out a sane way to correct the mess people like you and your cronies have got us in.


Dennis
Comment posted July 7, 2010 @ 3:46 pm

Well I was going to tell you how to solve this mess Obama’s gotten us into but if you’re going to be so mean about it and call me names, I’ve decided you’re on your own.


Dave
Comment posted July 7, 2010 @ 8:33 pm

oh no!!!


marcus_w71
Comment posted July 9, 2010 @ 3:07 pm

Dennis’s Plan

WWGWBD

What would George Dublya Bush Do?? or Jesus?


Rob C
Comment posted July 15, 2010 @ 8:44 am

Please Dennis, don’t give up on giving us mindless slogans of the right. Don’t let reality get in the way of your ideology,


Rob C
Comment posted July 15, 2010 @ 1:57 pm

The US economy is headed down because of its irrational faith in mythical “free market forces”. The idea is that somehow not planning and letting greed drive our economy magically will solve our problems is ruining us. So-called socialist European, and communist Chinese, economies are rapidly moving up. What we in the US really have is socialism for corporations, as their lobbyists and campaign contributions control the government. And, can we get real about taxes? We have low taxes and no politician in sight can even suggest raising them. Open your eyes. Taxes have gone down (especially for the rich and corporations) and the economy gets worse. Does evidence have any meaning to you?

A planned and regulated economy is always going to win over a random, greed-based system in the long run. Note that during WWII we did not let “market forces” control the economy. Nope, we went for Keynesian economics in a big way–and it paid off. Keep the faith-based economics conservatives, the sooner you mindlessly ruin the country the sooner we can move on.


peter
Comment posted October 30, 2011 @ 3:32 pm

What is also interesting is the way in which the financial crisis in Europe has brought down the national governments. One of the recent cases is the fall of the Slovak government because of the disagreement over the EFSF which should be the last resort if one of the biggest European countries such as Spain or Italy suddenly defaulted. Only the future will reveal whether the EFSF will respond adequately to the negative economic development in those countries but the mutual interconnection is clear to everyone.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.