Senate expected to OK unemployment benefits extension today
Tuesday, July 20, 2010 at 8:44 am
Congress plans to vote today on a federal extension of unemployment benefits, held up in the Senate for an unprecedented two months. The Senate will reconsider H.R. 4213, also known as the jobs bill or the extenders package, as the vehicle for a $34 billion extension of jobless benefits — retroactive to June 2, when they lapsed, and continuing through the end of November.
The vote will take place immediately following the swearing-in of Carte Goodwin, the replacement for Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.), who passed away at the end of June at the age of 92. That vote will be the 60-vote cloture hurdle to end debate. With Goodwin, the Democrats have 59 in their caucus, and Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins are expected to cross the aisle, while Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) will vote no.
The bill will then move on to a majority-rules vote on the actual legislation, which will return to the House, where the Democratic leadership plans to pass it as quickly as possible. (The Senate is not voting on H.R. 5618, the House’s standalone version, opting instead to hold a new vote on the Senate bill, which already failed to pass cloture once, in order to bypass an additional procedural roadblock.) President Obama could sign the bill as early as Wednesday evening, barring procedural hold-ups, and states could begin the process of disbursing the benefits as early as Thursday morning.
The bill does not include an extension of the $25-a-week Federal Additional Compensation funds, tacked onto many unemployment checks. It also does not include any of the other provisions originally included in or proposed for the jobs bill or extenders package: It does not close tax loopholes, or provide Medicare funding to states, or include funds to keep teachers and other state employees working. It also does not create an additional fifth tier of benefits; federal extensions only continue in states with higher than an 8 percent unemployment rate, and the maximum weeks of state and federal benefits remains ninety-nine.
Nevertheless, the unemployment extension comes as a desperately needed lifeline to 2.5 million American families. “When millions of Americans lost their jobs, they didn’t just lose a place to go to work in the morning,” Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said on the Senate floor on Monday. “They lost their incomes, their savings and their retirement security. They lost their tuition payments. Many lost their homes. They lost their gas money and their grocery money. All of this through no fault of their own. I’m not talking about just a handful of people in an isolated corner of the country. I’m talking about millions of Americans from every one of our states.”
Additionally, economists expect the unemployment benefits extension to have a strong stimulative impact on the economy, as the recovery lags and a growing band of experts calls for more government spending to keep up demand. Lawrence Mishel, the head of the Economic Policy Institute, estimates that the unemployment benefits extension will support 800,000 jobs over the remainder of the year — as the unemployed generally spend their unemployment benefits immediately, rather than using them to pay down debt or to keep as savings. Unemployment benefits usually end up costing the government only about 40 percent of the sticker price, Mishel said on a call with reporters on Monday. “[Passing the unemployment extension] is not only a decent thing to do. It’s one of the most stimulative things you can do to create jobs,” he noted.
But Republicans have argued that unemployment benefits should no longer be considered emergency spending, in which case they would not be allowed to raise the deficit. “We’ve offered ways of paying for these programs, and we’ve been eager to approve them,” argued Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). “But we can’t support job-killing taxes and adding tens of billions to the already unsustainable national debt. So the only reason the unemployment extension hasn’t passed is because Democrats simply refuse to pass a bill that doesn’t add to the debt. That’s it. That’s the only difference between what they’ve offered and what we’ve offered.” A number of Republican senators — including McConnell and Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) — introduced unemployment bills with offsets.
Over the weekend, President Obama joined the Democratic caucus in hitting at Republicans for blocking the benefits for so long. Never in U.S. history have extended benefits been allowed to expire with unemployment over 7 percent. He devoted his Saturday radio address the topic. And, speaking in the Rose Garden on Monday, flanked by three unemployed Americans, Obama said: “[Republicans] say we shouldn’t provide unemployment insurance because it costs money. So after years of championing policies that turned a record surplus into a massive deficit, including a tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, they’ve finally decided to make their stand on the backs of the unemployed. They’ve got no problem spending money on tax breaks for folks at the top who don’t need them and didn’t even ask for them; but they object to helping folks laid off in this recession who really do need help.”
29 Comments
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 9:06 am
“Obama said: “[Republicans] say we shouldn’t provide unemployment insurance because it costs money.”
He’s a liar. The republicans said to pay for it using $34 billion from the hundreds of billions remaining in the stimulus slush fund. Harry Reid said no.
Republicans are only insisting on using Obama’s PayGo policy that he and the democrats claimed everyone was to follow.
It’s interesting how none of that is in the article and readers would have never known the truth without reading my comments. Nice “journalism” there, Annie.
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 9:15 am
I have been employed continuously for 40 years in the construction industry up until october of 2008.
After all these years and without notice my unemployment benefits were stopped.
I find it ludicrous that afer 19 months of trying to secure new employment I have 1500 applications processed with 5 interviews at half the salary. Where’s the beef as promised by this stimulus package? Why are the benefits that were taken out of my salary for 40 years? Where’s the interest on these benefits taken for 40 years?
The US congress approves funds for numerous foreign countries yet they have reservations in assisting their own people who are the butt of this legislative joke. They take a vacation when the people who elected them are hurting. This is a slap in the face for all american people not just the unemployed.
I should hope today they not only vote the extension but work on providing new employment opportunities needed to stimulate the american economy now not 10 years from now.
Sincerely,
Martin E. Oliverio
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 9:18 am
Obama is a Liar?Well Dennis why not face up to the fact that the BIGGEST Liars are THE REPUBLICANS!WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?STARTING A SENSELESS WAR BASED ON FALSE INFORMATION THAT PUT THE DEFECIT WAY INTO THE RED!WAKE UP!!!!
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 9:23 am
Sounds like you’re employed Dennis, but am wondering what “stimulus slush fund” are you referring to? The Republicans are making their stand on the backs of the unemployed as Obama said. On the contrary, Annie did an excellent job of even handed reporting and letting the country know how the Republicans are trying to take this country down.
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 9:35 am
Not a word is said here about the exemption added to bar registered former sex offenders from getting their unemployment benefits. Is that punitive, discriminatory, unconstitutional provision still attached to the bill?
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 10:26 am
So, am I reading this incorrectly or does the statement “federal extensions only continue in states with higher than an 8 percent unemployment rate” mean that the unemployed in Minnesota would not qualify for any additional benefits even with the passage of this bill?
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 10:40 am
What about the FOUR MILLION AMERICANS THAT ARE GOING HOMELESS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT FIND A JOB, EXHAUSTED THEIR 4TH TIER EXTENSION BACK IN EITHER FEBRUARY OR MARCH (DEPENDING ON WHAT STATE A PERSON LIVES IN), AND NOW THE PRESIDENT & THE ENTIRE SENATE REFUSES TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR CRITICAL NEED OF A 5TH TIER EXTENSION??
WHAT A DISGRACE!!
HOW CAN THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 2.5 MILLION AMERICANS NEED AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPLY FOR ONE OF THE FIRST FOUR TIERS BUT SAY NOTHING ABOUT THE 4 MILLION THAT ARE GOING HOMELESS AND NEED A LIFE-LINE VIA A 5TH TIER EXTENSION??
POLITICS AS USUAL. BUT NOVEMBER IS ON 3 1/2 MONTHS AWAY AND THESE USELESS AND DISGRACEFUL POLTICIANS WILL GET VOTED OUT BY ALL THE AMERICANS THAT THEY TURNED THEIR BACKS ON!!
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 10:48 am
This is crazy,saying that this is a “lazy” issue and not a “economic” issue. People who are unemployed are their for a reason. I am in sales and the last placed I worked closed down. And so many places are slashing employees instead of opening more jobs. I have worked since I was 11 years old with my first paper route and now I cant find a job. This is more then just “lazy”. The government needs to do something and lowering taxes for the rich in this country isn’t going to solve a darn thing.
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 10:57 am
I would think that this extention includes “all the people”. If you work and pay taxes and all the other deductions that are taken out, there is NO legitimate way of discriminating against anyone. All deserve to collect. Especially those who have worked hard all their lives and through no fault of their own are unemployed. Are people aware as to where our tax money goes? A lot of it goes to people who have NEVER worked. I wonder sometimes why I work with all the freebies out there? People who have housing work under the hat, who collect ssi work under the hat, who collect welfare work under the hat. This is soooooooooooo true, and I hear it all the time. time for the government to get tough, and NOT with people who work and pay their taxes. Do you know many people on these freebie programs, live with others, lie, work??? Many. So pay the extention to those who deserve it and take the money from somewhere else. It is things like this that make you wonder.
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 11:08 am
President Obama is a liar and a fool. This type of political rhetoric only divides an already divided Washington. The Republicans are right this time. Extend the benefits but offset the cost.
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 11:43 am
@Sheila Mayol
As of last report, there is $362 billion remaining in the $787 billion “stimulus” fund. More than 10 times what is needed to pay for the unemployment checks.
http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 11:44 am
Martin, you didn’t pay into unemployment for 40 years. Your employers did. There isn’t a fund for one person that accrues. Perhaps you’re mixing ti up with something else? This isn’t a stimulus package, just an extension of unemployment benefits, which does have stimulative effect. I’m all in favor of another stimulus package to directly create more jobs, and we have plenty of infrastructure construction projects that need doing, even if the economy were great. High unemployment in the construction industry, even above the general unemployment rate, just makes those projects more urgent.
Unfortunately the “deficit hawks” who had no problems with unfunded wars and tax cuts for the wealthiest to create deficits have suddenly discovered austerity again, now that the people seeking help are long-term unemployed and not wealthy contributors or defense contractors. Tell the Republican seantors who stopped the jobs bill that you’ll remember them in November.
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 12:22 pm
I thought HR4213 includes the stimulus and the other bill already passed by congress HR5618 doesn’t. Some of these reporters don’t know what’s going on now I don’t know either
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 12:55 pm
I believe in helping people, but for a great pct of these people on unemployment, we might as well stop their unemployment & give them welfare. Let’s revise the unemployment system & force people to take jobs that are at lower pay, then have the gov/state help offset the differnce in wages collected. There are jobs out there!!!
WOW…who knows..with hard work, then might be able to get back to where they were..WE HAVE TO STOP MAKING AMERICANS LAZY!!!
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 2:53 pm
Some of us want to work and will work for less. But, CA has no jobs–I mean NO jobs.
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 3:00 pm
Sam…I’m sorry about where you live & I know it’s easier to say then do…BUT DO WHAT I DID & MOVE WHERE THERE ARE JOBS!!!
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 3:06 pm
one more thing Sam…after 20years of retail mgmt…I changed my field, went into sales & after hard work moved back into mgmt..Don’t give up..the jobs are out there..you might have to get creative..but one thing I know for sure..a person that works hard..has the will..and has a great work ethic like myself would be an asset & move up where ever they go!!!
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 8:15 pm
Why is it now the Republicans are talking about “pay as you go”? When we were waging war I didn’t hear anything about “pay as you go” then. How convenient that it makes sense now to be concerned about the deficit. That’s right, we had a surplus then!
Comment posted July 20, 2010 @ 9:24 pm
Uh, Kay … Paygo was Obama’s idea.
“Now, Congress will have to pay for what it spends, just like everybody else,” Obama said in his radio and Internet address released Saturday morning. “After a decade of profligacy, the American people are tired of politicians who talk the talk but don’t walk the walk when it comes to fiscal responsibility. It’s easy to get up in front of the cameras and rant against exploding deficits. What’s hard is actually getting deficits under control. But that’s what we must do.”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32921.html
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 8:29 am
I agree with Dennis. Reporting on every Unemployment Compensation bill has been absolutely horrible, with Republicans painted as being against the emergency unemployment program, when nothing could be farther from the case.
Republicans have maintained all along that they do want to extend the program, and if one takes the time to actually do their homework, which most reporters are too lazy to do this days, one finds that these bills end up passing by huge margins and not along party lines. A majority of Republicans have voted FOR the ones that have passed. The GOP has said all along their only concern was how to pay for it.
To mute the criticism of Dennis (and the complete illogic of saying people with jobs are somehow disqualified from commenting on the issue) I *am* unemployed, and have been so since before spring 2009. I know it’s not easy to get by on government checks, but I have always been grateful for them, I do not feel a sense of entitlement to them.
If they go away before I find a job, I will do what I have to do. Three 20-hour jobs at minimum wage will pay me as much as I’m making on unemployment. I have marketable skills and I do not want to work at McDonalds or Walmart, or 60 hour weeks but if that’s what people have to do, that’s what they’ll have to do.
People should grow up, take responsibility for their own lives and stop whining and waiting for the government to take care of them.
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 11:01 am
I cannot believe that they are not adding a 5th tier. In California there are about 100,000 individuals. Those who have exhausted all their benefits (99 weeks) are mostly from the baby boomers years. They are literally being crushed and forgotten. This age group suffers from severe age discrimination concerning jobs. I have looked for any type of work. In 3 years I have received very little work offers here and there. And yet my resume is riddled with experience. This world is ruled by the young who have no concept of life. Remember you will get old too. Karma’s a bitch. The United States no longer takes care of their senior citizens and those nearing that age group. Shame on you. We are the backbone of this country. When you disrespect us, karma will come back to bite you.
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 2:21 pm
if bush wouldn’t have outsourced most of our good paying factories jobs. this country wouldn’t be in the mess its in now
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 3:00 pm
Ive only been unemployed for about 6 months, my unemployment ended in june. ive been applying for jobs, yes even minumum wages jobs since i was laid off. I cant get get hired, either im over qualified or not qualified. Sure the 200.00 bucks a week help, but i am in no way abusing the system. Im sure the ones blocking the approval of this bill spend that or more in a day!! Stop sending jobs over seas and hurting the american people. and if people dont get their unemployment checks..guess what? the economy will continue to suffer. If ppl dont have money to buy things, more employers will start laying off, thus adding to more ppl being unemployed and the US will be a third world country.
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 3:51 pm
why is there no clear and to the point statement that this extension DOES NOT benefit minnesotans in this and other articles on minnesota news sites? As I read about this extension it does not and that is a more relevant point for minnesota readers than the endless reiteration that it has been passed, that I keep reading.
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 5:53 pm
@ jessica. did you know that many companys will pay for yourmove & that they would even buy your house if it doesn’t sell???!!!
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 6:05 pm
agree or disagree with me..you have that right, but here is a real life situation.
I have a good friend (In kentucky) that makes $60,000 plus a year. his wife worked for 1 year & quit her job..found another job & got fired after 4 months..and now is collecting unemployment for over a year. I am not heartless & I think we need to help out or people..BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE ON UNEMPLOYMENT ARE LIKE MY FRIENDS WIFE & WHY ISN’T THERE SOMETHING PUT IN PLACE TO DETERMINE IF YOU NEED TO COLLECT UNEMPLOYMENT..NOT JUST MAKE IT AN AUTOMATIC BLANKET EXTENSION..THE WAY THE SYSTEM IS SET UP..IF YOU MAKES MILLIONS OF DOLLARS A YEAR & YOUR SPOUSE GOT LAIDOFF FROM HIS/HER JOB..THEY TOO CAN COLLECT UNEMPLOYMENT…How can anyone agree what the gov is doing!!
What happened to Bill Clintons welfare to work program…samething isn’t it???
Comment posted July 21, 2010 @ 9:56 pm
The US economy is collapsing. See this article:
Here’s the actual data source:
Good bye, America!
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







