IP’s Horner trails rest of the pack in fundraising
Monday, July 26, 2010 at 3:46 pm

Tom Horner
The last non-self-funded gubernatorial candidate has released campaign finance numbers, and they pale in comparison to his opponents. MPR reports that Independence Party candidate Tom Horner raised $190,000 since the beginning of 2010, leaving him with only $27,500 left in the bank.
Those numbers are dwarfed by Horner’s Republican and DFL opponents. While it is not surprising that Horner would trail in funding while running as a third-party candidate, the gap is intimidatingly large. Republican Tom Emmer reported holding over 10 times as much cash on hand, while DFLer Margaret Anderson Kelliher had 14 times as much money remaining in her campaign coffers.
These figures will only further the idea that the Independence Party candidate will be a spoiler in the general election campaign. Since Jesse Ventura won the governorship in 1998 (back when the organization was still known as the Reform Party), IP candidates have drawn consistently less and less support in elections. Polls have shown Horner drawing anywhere from 10 to 18 percent, but he has never finished higher than third in any of the surveys.
5 Comments
Comment posted July 26, 2010 @ 10:20 pm
I don’t intend to be a spoiler, I intend to win. This is the year of the anti-incumbent. We have to repeal the health care bill. Have to protect national security. Have to deal with the border situation, so Arizona doesn’t go down a rathole with its economy, have to bring back quality education (like when I went to school and we had to take on the Soviets), have to break down the racial divide, have to have competitive businesses and jobs, back away from the brink of socialism.
I think Horner probably has enough money. It’s not a spending contest, isn’t that the central message of this mid-year election? It’s about ideas. Let’s talk a little about ideas, and not so much personalities and spending other people’s money. This is a serious year for America, SERIOUS year. Let’s get serious.
I think Emmer’s idea of an Arizona statute here is a pretty awful idea for Minnesota, and Tom, I hope you won’t support it. So I’ll vote for you over Emmer. I hope you’ll look over some of my ideas for Minnesota and the 4th Congressional District, too.
Comment posted July 26, 2010 @ 11:09 pm
Yeah, but, he’s still facing four other slates. I’m sure once he wraps it up, he’ll be in a better position to fundraise and challenge Emmer and Dayton. He seems to be pretty good at that. By the way, any resources expended by other Independence gubernatorial candidates will only build the presence of the Independence Party, so I don’t think you can compare this to the need that Kelliher or Entenza have to challenge Dayton for the behemoth Democratic primary vote. They have to suck up resources. Still, in my humble opinion, all the major party ads have been pretty silly so far. Guess they’re trying (not always successfully) not to offend anybody.
Comment posted July 26, 2010 @ 11:11 pm
Sorry, by “major party” I was referring to Democrats and Republicans, the ones Patrick thinks are major.
I think the Independence Party ads I’ve seen (and I haven’t seen them all, I’m sure) have been introducing the candidates and creating the party image in the media, while I see Emmer and somebody (Democrats) have been slugging it out trying to take each other down. Still pretty silly, though.
Comment posted July 27, 2010 @ 9:46 am
And here I thought Horner was going to be the big “middle way” threat… without media money in a modern election you can’t win and it looks like Horner’s cupboard is bare.
Comment posted July 27, 2010 @ 12:00 pm
Well, we’ll see, “Amuseinc”. I think it’s still in the hands of the voters, not money-hungry old media. That’s why they’re dying. But I’m hoping the new media are more motivated and productive than money sloths.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






