Emmer continues support for Arizona immigration bill
Thursday, July 29, 2010 at 9:56 am
GOP-endorsed gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer released a carefully worded statement Wednesday night disagreeing with the court injunction against the controversial Arizona immigration legislation. The press release reads:
Every state has the constitutional authority, even the obligation to protect its citizens from any threat to the safety of their person or their property.
The Court in this case ignores the real constitutional question in an attempt to justify the federal government’s failure to secure our borders and create a realistic, consistent, easy to understand path to citizenship. We need to encourage immigrants who still desire the freedom and opportunity the United States is supposed to offer to enter this country legally and, further, to become productive and contributing members of the community.
Emmer’s position on SB 1070 has been a point of contention during his campaign. After the law passed in April, Emmer said, “I think what Arizona has done is a wonderful first step,” but he later attempted to moderate that stance.
Emmer’s position on immigration also inspired an infamous campaign incident, when a protester poured 2,000 pennies in front of the candidate during a forum regarding Emmer’s policy ideas on tip credits and the minimum wage.
8 Comments
Comment posted July 29, 2010 @ 9:59 am
If Minnesota has this Tea Party law, everybody will need to carry papers. Why? Because we have those damn “Frostback” Canucks around here taking our jobs. And they can imitate white people just like you and me…
Comment posted July 29, 2010 @ 10:13 am
The judge’s first error was in telling the state that enforcing the state law would be too inconvenient for the cop. That’s not her role. As a federal judge, she can only address the enforcement of federal law.
Her second error was in saying that showing their papers would not be required, when in fact that’s the federal law.
Since it’s already federal law that all immigrants carry their “papers” with them at all times, it will become routine for arresting officers to ask if you are a citizen. If you say “no,” you’ll be asked to show your immigration papers. If you have none, ICE will be called. If you say “yes,” and it’s found later when you go to court on the inital charges that you’re not, you’ll face additional charges.
Comment posted July 29, 2010 @ 10:18 am
So Dennis can add “legal scholar” to the list of topics of which he thinks he’s an expert.
Comment posted July 29, 2010 @ 2:38 pm
of course every state should protect its citizens, but while staying within constitutionally defined rules of government behavior. there is little evidence to suggest that hassling brown people in Arizona about their immigration status will make things safer, and the law – as it stands, enjoined – will cause brown people to be hassled, violating their rights and overburdening law enforcement.
what’s worse, many of those brown people have roots in the community that are much deeper than Arizona statehood, and a lot deeper than when the rich white conservative snowbirds started flocking to Scottsdale and other AZvwinter havens
Comment posted July 29, 2010 @ 3:11 pm
Mill,
Just b/c one has a few $$ to go down south for the winter doesn’t make them rich or conservative.
Comment posted July 31, 2010 @ 2:24 pm
The catching and expulsion of illegal immigrants has gone up under Obama44, though I am sure it does not feel that way in AZ.
SB1070 has already negatively impacted foreign relations, another manufactured headache for the federal government.
But the biggest problems with SB1070 may be with self-inflicted wounds. For example, it:
undermines “Governmental Tort Immunity”,
elevates court treatment of illegal immigrant cases above rape, murder, and terrorism,
eliminates the possibility of humanitarian exceptions,
has loopholes that enable harassment,
and contains bill of attainder qualities.
This law is like putting a warning shot through their own foot.
I am not surprised republicans want to repeat it all across the country.
Comment posted August 1, 2010 @ 2:42 pm
The anti-Arizona protesters are racist. They believe that brown people are either not capable of or are exempt from obeying the law.
Comment posted August 4, 2010 @ 11:50 pm
what about when the gringos go to cabo san lucas mexico and they start taking jobs and braking the law during spring brake? what gives them the right to go anywhere in other country in not obey the laws?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






