City inspectors board up raided home for ‘code violations’

By Molly Priesmeyer
Saturday, August 30, 2008 at 1:18 pm

UPDATE at 2:40 p.m.: City requires tenants to fix back door kicked in by police by 6 p.m. today or they will continue with boarding process.

After the police raid this morning at 3240 17th Avenue in South Minneapolis, in which the homeowner, 23-year-old Monica Bicking, and two other people were arrested for “conspiracy to riot,” city inspectors came in at about 11:30 to board up the two-story home. City officials, including Tom Deegan, manager of the city’s problem properties unit, were on hand along with Casterjon, the private contractor in charge with boarding, to close up the home for what Deegan calls “code violations.”

Bicking’s lawyer, Bruce Nestor, asked for more specific reasons for the boarding and attempted to halt the boarding process until he got them, but he was thwarted by officials and police. Deegan says he will release specific reasons for the boarding to the Joint Information Center (a partnership with MPD and SPPD) later today.

Alex, who only wants to go by his first name, was at the house during the raid. He moved in to the home, along with Bicking, two weeks ago. He says that along with the other three roommates, they had invited around 30 people to stay at the home during the RNC so that friends from all over could be involved with protests. They had no intent of causing a “riot,” and were part of a peaceful protest mission. Still, Alex says electronic equipment and anything that could be used to make molotov cocktails was confiscated from the home. The police even took cans of paint out of the garage. The Minneapolis police conducted the raid after a warrant was issued by Ramsey County as part of a joint powers agreement in place between the two cities for the RNC.

After the police spent hours loading a truck full of electronic equipment and other property from the home, officials from the city’s problem properties unit showed up to board up the home. Alex says he was told it was because there were too many people sleeping in the attic. “We had a bunch of mattresses on the floor, because we had people staying with us,” he says. “And now they’re saying Monica’s house will be shut down for that. She’s in jail now. She’s not here to defend herself. It doesn’t make sense.”

Neighbors were angry that the city was boarding the home, too. One neighbor yelled to police officers, “We have a crack house next door that you do nothing about. But then you’re going to board up the home of these kids! This is pure propaganda and you should be ashamed of yourselves!” Indeed, the home next door did have a number of visible code violations: tall grass and weeds, trash in the yard. Neighbors said they call about problems with the home all the time, and nothing is ever done.

Yet along with being unable to enter her home, Bickling will have another rude awakening when she’s released from jail: The city charges $6,000 to homeowners for boarding up properties. Often these are charges for abandoning properties, a result of the foreclosure crisis. But in Bickling’s case, all that anyone, including the roommates and Bickling’s lawyer, were told before the plywood went up is that the home had “code violations.”

UPDATE: City officials halted the boarding process in the early afternoon and told remaining tenants that the back door, which was kicked in by police before the raid, would have to be fixed by 6 p.m. this evening or the home would be boarded. Ostensibly, the home was to be boarded for “code violations” this afternoon. But now the city is telling one roommate the entire home would be boarded in order to secure the property from trespassers who could now enter the home through the back door, which was broken by officers.

A woman staying at the home who did not want to be identified said that the roommates planned on fixing the door by 6 p.m. City officials also told her that at some point soon, the homeowner would be responsible for fixing a bedroom door upstairs, which was also kicked on by police officers this morning.

Categories & Tags: RNC 2008| | |

Comments

30 Comments

justinph
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 1:40 pm

Something tells me that 30 people living in one house is a code violation.


DenverRon
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 1:54 pm

During the DNC here in Denver I was a legal observer of the protests that took place here and had close up knowledge of what the protesters did and did not do and did and did not plan. I also witnessed time and again police officials making false statements to the press in order to paint protesters in the worst possible light and to help garner public opinion in their favor should the police act in a reckless or irresponsible manner.

In Denver in the run up to the convention police officials in order to add weight to their arguments for 'special' laws to deal with protesters put forth the false idea that protesters were planning to fling feces and urine at police and would be coming with a wild variety of weapons.

During the course of the protests police released statements alleging that protesters were seen carrying rocks and had been observed carrying bags of “inidentified mysterious liquids”. All four days of the demonstrations here I was variously positioned at the frontlines between the protesters and police or in the midst of the protesters, at no time did I ever witness any of the activities alleged by the police and at no time did I witness anyone planning any of the actions being alleged by the police.

Rest assured that the authorities are acting pre-emptively not to protect the public but to protect themselves and I don't mean from any threats posed by the protesters per se but to protect their own image. By painting the protester in the worst possible light in advance of protesters legitimately exersicing their rights the police are trying to gain justification in advance for whatever actions they may chose to take regaless of violations of fundamental rights in the hopes of having the backing of the public regardless of how wrong they may be.


Molly Priesmeyer
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 1:55 pm

They weren't living there. The were visiting. Only five people live there on a regular basis. Plus, code violations happen all over the city (see the house next door), and the city isn't so swift to come in and close up the entire home. They didn't even give the homeowner a chance to fix said violations before they boarded it up.


Molly Priesmeyer
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 1:57 pm

Great points, DenverRon. As one neighbor said, it was part of the propaganda.


DenverRon
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 3:05 pm

There is a significant difference between visiting and living at a residence. Any reasonable thinking person would conclude that most of the 30 people were only staying for the duration of the RNC.


rusty65
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 3:19 pm

I attended the meeting at Powderhorn Park today and it brought me to tears, this country and all the rights as citizens are being stripped layer by layer from us all!
The lives given by our founding Fathers of this great country and the lives sacrificed in WWI and WWII have been for naught.
911 enabled the right wing establishment and big business to pull on peoples fears which resulted in the loss of our human rights according to the Constitution of the United States, Amendments and the Bill of rights!
The time has come to rise up and fight the hard fight to restore and maintain our rights and freedoms set forth by the actions of our people in the past!


David
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 5:03 pm

The Constitution burns under George Bush. What happened to due process and the First Amendment? Shame on you MInneapolis.


meowomon
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 5:03 pm

Were the cops wearing brown shirts and jackboots?


ElleninBigD
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 5:12 pm

Ain't Bushworld Great? No civil liberties, privacy, etc.


ElleninBigD
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 5:13 pm

I's pretty obvious that this was only for a week, during the RNC convention. They were going to protest and were targeted. That's it.


ElleninBigD
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 5:16 pm

But let's not forget the those 3 guys picked up in/or close to Denver w/sniper rifles/equiped for silencers, camo gear, binoculars etc. They weren't deemed a threat to Obama. Just meth-heads.


Dana Pearson
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 7:43 pm

Fascism….


Gerda
Comment posted August 30, 2008 @ 11:49 pm

As a former Minnesotan, I am very disappointed to see such discriminatory actions taking place in a city I was always proud of. What has happened to the place I once called home, where constitutional rights were recognized and equality wasn't just talked about – it was practiced. Is this what Republican politics (Bush and Cheney) have made even Minnesotans turn into? If so, I mourn the death of the land of Lake Wobegon. Fer sure. You betcha.


Jason
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 8:10 am

i pray the majority of citizens of this country will wake up! What does it have to take to make people see what is going on???


A. Blenio
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 4:48 pm

I can't help but laugh out loud at the sad Police State my country has become. I live in Europe, where in many countries they actually *have* the legal power to do what the police did there today, sometimes without a warrant. Yet when they occasionally exercise such power there is outrage across the entire country, and heads roll (if only years later). That pretty little constitution the U.S. is so proud of is only as good as the people who force it to be upheld. Cheers to the NLG for being there for these people.


watercat
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 6:41 pm

They train them in Iraq, then bring them home for jobs in the security industry. Expect more of it.


Russron
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 7:23 pm

Ding, Ding, Ding–we have a winner. Dana Pearson is the first person to call this what it is. Although meowoman came close with the “brown shirts and jackboots”. So, does enough of the Constitution exist for someone to file suit for violation of Constitutional Rights? Anyone? I don't have standing, but I'm damned hopeful that someone will sue every government official, involved in this. I would include the cost of repair of what the police destroyed and any equipment confiscated, which is not returned. I would definitely include the clear lack of action in the crack house nearby, as evidence that because of their political beliefs, these folks were targeted and their Civil Rights were violated. To summarize, no action where public safety should be acted on, but heavy handed action for something that isn't.


LimaBN
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 8:21 pm

The back door was fixed.
The garage door was also busted, even though the next door neighbor offered to just push the button for them and let the automatic opener do the job for them.


RedHeron
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 9:54 pm

Yeah, it's not like they were reporters on the street doing an expose or anything, eh?


RedHeron
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 9:55 pm

Something tells me that it was 35 people and it was 3 houses (with 6-12 people per house). They also handcuffed a 5-year-old child, as I recall… but hey, at least it's not a code violation!


harry54
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 10:13 pm

Great Comment by A Blenio. I agree completely. Just Because it is written, at this point in this country's tilt toward erosion of civil rights, we can not expect the government to uphold them-just look at recent supreme court desions.
Please remember Fletcher's position as sheriff is an elected position and it would be wise to remember this whenever he runs again so that he can be opposed by someone who actually believes in the constitution.


DenverRon
Comment posted August 31, 2008 @ 10:38 pm

I'm sorry, the point you are trying to make is what???


TennMom
Comment posted September 1, 2008 @ 12:11 am

What is happening in Minneapolis is eerily similar to some of the tactics the Chinese government used when “cleaning up” Beijing for the Olympic games. That is happened there was not surprising. That it is happening here is not just surprising, it is embarrassing and flies in the face of everything this country stands for.


William Simmer
Comment posted September 1, 2008 @ 1:10 pm

Isn't it wonderful to live in a country where we each have individual rights????? And these RIGHTS cannot be violated nor taken from us without “DUE PROCESS”!!!!!

I wonder what political party these officials are in! Oh! Maybe I can guess after all!


Derik
Comment posted September 1, 2008 @ 1:46 pm

I've been listening to and reading stories such as these for most my life. I grew up in a house where we were not to speak louder than a whisper about the government or else they could come and take everything away. And yes my grandparents were born and raised in this country. During WWII my grandfather was in the service and my grandmother worked for the government. Truth is you can pretty much stay under the radar and do what you want so long as you don't obstruct the government or expose its corruption for what it is. And for things like this happen sporadicly and in small numbers to where the majority of the nation will either not get involved or quickly forget and continue in their daily routines of complacency. As for the crack house unless if it was selling crack and bringing in a lot of money the authorities would care less because its what they can confiscate in a seize that matters most. And as for the protesters or anyone else for that matter, if they find a bottle of jack in your liqueur cabinet and a face cloth in your bathroom or even various cleaning solvents under your sink your automatically a terrorist plotting an attack.


idunno
Comment posted September 1, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

Forgive my ignorance. If the city creates the code violations, through it's own police force, does the city not have to fix the code violations?


BlueberryNight
Comment posted September 2, 2008 @ 12:20 am

The main reporters for Democracy Now, journalism veterans (not kids) were arrested while covering the convention outside, also for “conspiracy to riot.” Because freedom of the press only only applies to press approved by the government, obviously.


Bob Garcia
Comment posted September 2, 2008 @ 1:04 am

Seems like your typical Political Repression to me. . Considering some of bush''s previous repressive laws, I'm surprised he hasn't had them moved COMPLETELY out of sight of the politicians instead of just 740 feet away.


RedHeron
Comment posted September 3, 2008 @ 11:38 am

Par for the course, apparently…

http://iwitnessvideo.info/blog/103.html

The police can't be trusted any more, since they don't act honorably. Whom else are we to trust?


patriot777
Comment posted October 29, 2008 @ 4:00 am

all we can do is play our part abide by the laws even though they might seem outragous. times to protest are times to protest and times to play it cool is times to play it cool. look how the u.n. is allowing the hatian national police to mow protestors down in the street. they already developed the denial weaponary for protestors, when our goverment turns corrupt then thats when we become corrupt because we are all americans. i will defend my country till the breath is gone from my longs from foriegn or domestic. i strongly believe there is still some good in our country but freedom must be restored in blood and faught for sometimes and there is no way to avoid it. the world looks at us as fat, dumb, and lazy but there are really mistaken. we will not fold we will not lay down and die we will not surrender because our liberties are drenched in blood to protect. its not about black and white its about the haves and the have nots and the goverment can depopulate people but they will have a hard time doing it.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.