Minnesota’s Chemberlin decries ‘xenophobia, bigotry’ of opponents of Islamic center near 9/11 site

By Paul Schmelzer
Wednesday, August 11, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Rev. Peg Chemberlin. Photo: National Council of Churches

Rev. Peg Chemberlin. Photo: National Council of Churches

Gov. Tim Pawlenty isn’t the only Minnesotan weighing in on an Islamic center planned for construction near New York’s World Trade Center: Peg Chemberlin, executive director of the Minnesota Council of Churches and president of the National Council of Churches, is among leaders of 40 American Christian, Jewish and Muslim groups who issued a statement today condemning the “xenophobia and religious bigotry” behind opposition like Pawlenty’s to the Cordoba House, an Islamic center planned two blocks from Ground Zero.

Pawlenty, presumably trying to buttress his rightwing bonafides for a likely presidential run, said he “strongly opposed” the New York project, calling it “inappropriate” and suggesting that it would be an affront to the victims of 9/11. “[F]rom a patriotic standpoint, it’s hallowed ground, it’s sacred ground, and we should respect that,” he said. Local Muslim groups urged the governor to retract the statement, and Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to serve in Congress, said Pawlenty was trying to appeal to the “most extreme elements of his party” with the opinion, adding, “I hope he doesn’t want to be president so bad that he’s willing to dishonor the First Amendment and our heritage of religious tolerance.”

But it’s Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin — who called the project a “provocation” that “stabs at the heart” of America — not Pawlenty, who are named by the 40 religious leaders.

“Christians who believe in the values of religious freedom and interfaith cooperation welcome plans for Cordoba House, a center of culture and dialogue that will honor our nation’s highest ideals,” said Chemberlin, in a statement released to coincide with the interfaith group Faithful America’s petition to “Stand with Muslim Americans.” She went on:

“We are deeply saddened by those who denigrate a religion which in so many ways is a religion of compassion and peace by associating all Muslims with violent extremism. That’s like equating all Christians to Timothy McVeigh’s actions. This center will reflect not only the best of Islam, but the enduring hope that Christians, Jews and Muslims can together find common ground in addressing the most urgent challenges of our time.”

The Catholic magazine America describes the planned project:

The Cordoba House is a planned $100 million, 13-story, glass and steel Islamic community center, which will include a mosque, a 500-seat auditorium, a swimming pool, a restaurant, and a bookstore. it will offer space for Friday prayers for 1,000–2,000 Muslims. The proposed construction will replace an existing 1850s Italianate building that was damaged in the September 11 attacks, about two blocks from the WTC site.

Here’s the text of the statement signed by Chemberlin:

Interfaith Leaders Stand with Cordoba House, Denounce Hateful Rhetoric

As Catholic, evangelical, mainline Protestant, Jewish and Muslim leaders and scholars committed to religious freedom and inter-religious cooperation, we are deeply troubled by the xenophobia and religious bigotry that has characterized some of the opposition to a proposed Islamic center and mosque near where the World Trade Center towers once stood.

Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House, is the most recent prominent opponent to cast this debate in a way that demonizes all Muslims and exploits fear to divide Americans. “It is a sign of their contempt for Americans and their confidence in our historic ignorance that they would deliberately insult us this way,” Gingrich, a Catholic, said in a statement. Sarah Palin, an evangelical Christian who frequently references her faith as an inspiration for her political beliefs, called plans for the center a “provocation.” Fox News has aired a steady stream of irresponsible commentary and biased coverage that reduces what should be a civil debate into starkly combative terms.

The profound tragedy of Sept. 11th revealed the horror that can unfold when a small minority of violent extremists manipulates religious language for political gain and falsely claims to represent one of the world’s great religions. We have witnessed this sinful corruption of religion across faith traditions throughout history and must condemn it without equivocation whenever or wherever it occurs. However, we fail to honor those murdered on that awful day – including Muslim Americans killed in the Twin Towers and Pentagon – by betraying our nation’s historic commitment to religious liberty, fueling ugly stereotypes about Islam and demeaning the vast majority of Muslims committed to peace. The proposed mosque would be part of Cordoba House, a center open to all Americans that will provide Islamic, interfaith and secular programs. The project aims to support “integration, tolerance of difference and community cohesion through arts and culture,” according to the Cordoba Initiative, which promotes improved “Muslim-West relations.” These are exactly the kind of efforts that foster dialogue, break down barriers and begin to build a world where religiously inspired violent extremism is less likely.

Mr. Gingrich, Ms. Palin and other prominent voices privileged to have the ear of the media would make a more lasting contribution to our nation if they stopped issuing inflammatory statements and instead helped inspire a civil dialogue between Christians, Jews and Muslims committed to a future guided by the principles of compassion, justice and peace. Fear-mongering and hateful rhetoric only undermine treasured values at the heart of diverse faith traditions and our nation’s highest ideals.

The Rev. Canon Peg Chemberlin
President, National Council of Churches
Executive Director, Minnesota Council of Churches

The Rev. Dr. Michael Kinnamon
General Secretary
National Council of Churches

The Rev. Dr. Ken Brooker Langston
Director, Disciples Justice Action Network
Coordinator, Disciples Center for Public Witness

The Rev. Chloe Breyer
Executive Director
The Interfaith Center of New York.

Lisa Sharon Harper
Executive Director
New York Faith and Justice

Simon Greer
President and CEO
Jewish Funds for Justice

Rabbi Joy Levitt
Executive Director
Jewish Community Center in Manhattan

Rabbi Marc Schneier
President
The Foundation for Ethnic Understanding

Rabbi Richard Hirsh
Executive Director
Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association

Rabbi Irwin Kula
President
CLAL – National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership

Rabbi Abie Ingber
Founding Director
Interfaith Community Engagement
Xavier University
Cincinnati, Ohio

Jeremy Ben-Ami
President

J Street
Salam Al-Marayati
President
Muslim Public Affairs Council

Mohamed Elsanousi
Director of Community Outreach
Islamic Society of North America

Rabbi Nancy Fuchs Kreimer
Associate Professor
Director, Department of Multifaith Studies and Initiatives
Reconstructionist Rabbinical College

Rabbi Gerald Serotta
Clergy Beyond Borders

Virginia Avniel Spatz
Program Director
Clergy Beyond Borders

Sister Mary Waskowiak, RSM
President
Institute of the Sisters of Mercy of the Americas

Sister Simone Campbell, SSS
Executive Director
NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby

Sister Marlene Weisenbeck, FSPA
President
Leadership Conference of Women Religious

David Robinson
Executive Director
Pax Christi USA

Marie Dennis
Director
Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Co-President Pax Christi International

T. Michael McNulty, SJ
Justice and Peace Director
Conference of Major Superiors of Men
John Esposito
University Professor & Founding Director

Prince Alwaleed Bin-Talal
Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding
Georgetown University

John Zoll
Associate Director

Prince Alwaleed Bin-Talal
Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding
Georgetown University

James E. Hug, S.J.
President
Center of Concern

Sister Maria Riley, OP
Senior Advisor
Center of Concern

Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon
Congregation B’nai Jeshurun
New York, NY

Rabbi Brant Rosen
Jewish Reconstructionist Congregation
Evanston, IL

Rabbi Sue Levy
Houston, Texas

Rabbi Dev Noily
Oakland, CA

Rabbi Laurie Zimmerman
Congregation Shaarei Shamayim
Madison, WI

Paul Lakeland
Professor of Catholic Studies
Director, Center for Catholic Studies
Fairfield University

Thomas J. Reese, S.J.
Senior Fellow
Woodstock Theological Center
Georgetown University

Robin Darling Young
Associate Professor
Department of Theology
University of Notre Dame

Alex Mikulich
Research Fellow
Jesuit Social Research Institute
Loyola University, New Orleans

Stephen Schneck
Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies
Catholic University of America

David J. O’Brien
Professor Emeritus of History
University of Dayton

Terrence W. Tilley
Professor of Catholic Theology
Chair, Theology Department
Fordham University
Bronx, New York

Nicholas P. Cafardi
Dean Emeritus and Professor of Law
Duquesne University School of Law

Jeannine Hill Fletcher
Associate Professor of Theology
Fordham University

Lew Daly
Senior Fellow
Demos

Francis Schüssler Fiorenza
Stillman Professor
Harvard Divinity School

John Renard
Professor of Theological Studies
Saint Louis University

Bradford E. Hinze
Professor of Theology
Fordham University
Bronx, New York

Sandra A. Yocum
Chair of Religious Studies
University of Dayton

Affiliations listed for identification purposes only.

Comments

8 Comments

ernest j. chamberlain
Comment posted August 11, 2010 @ 5:06 pm

I think that Peg Chemberlin and these other “interfaith religious leaders” need to take a moment to think about what they are doing. These people keep claiming that Islam is primarily a religion of peace. To people like me, the peace they offer seems to be one of submission to Islamic domination. They think that calling them names will cause the opponents of this mosque to back down and shut their mouths. They believe that religous tolerance is important, but history and the facts don’t match their statements. Where is the tolerance for other religions in countries where Islam and sharia law is supreme? I think that the notion of building a community center that just happens to include an islamic mosque in that particular spot is nothing more than an “in your face, infidel!” challenge to this country. These interfaith people are exactly what communists refer to as “Useful fools.” I also happen to believe that, rather then the violent individuals and groups being treated as an abberation, they are in fact showing us the real, true, face of Islam. Their actions ae showing us what will happen to the westenr nations if the muslims win the culture war!


Amir
Comment posted August 12, 2010 @ 5:10 am

First, let’s make it very clear. Islam is a religion that promotes peace! Now, just like any other religion on the face of this Earth, there are fanatics who twist or distort various elements within the Islamic teachings.

Case in point, the OBL’s out there would have some Muslims believe that the term “jihad” means war, when the Qur’aan does not indicate it as such. The right-wing bigots and fanatics would then jump on the bandwagon to rally their mass with their zealot mentality, claiming that ISLAM, not the OBL’s or such people like him is the fault.

Many (I didn’t say all) Muslims have lived in peace with their Jewish and Christian neighbors for centuries and as a default, we prefer to live in PEACE with everyone and everything, including animals (and yes, that would include dogs!)

Seriously people, this world isn’t black and white. Take off the bigoted and islamophobic hats and start engaging Muslims in a civilized debate to HELP this world become better. Don’t fuel the hate.

Peace/Salaam/Shalom

Amir


Mike
Comment posted August 12, 2010 @ 1:20 pm

The debate is not that the site is to be built. IT is where it is to be built. No one says they CAN NOT buildi it, just that they should not build it at that site. If they are as ‘undertanding’ as they say, move it a mile away. It still is a center for Muslims at a new address, right?


Dave
Comment posted August 12, 2010 @ 8:52 pm

“Where is the tolerance for other religions in countries where Islam and sharia law is supreme?”

Who cares what they do in the backward s***holes of the world? As long as our homegrown fundies don’t get their way, the USA is soooooo far above that.

Are we better than that, or not?


Asad
Comment posted August 14, 2010 @ 10:27 am

I commend Rev Chamberlin and all the signers of the petition. They show respect for the values of tolerance and pluralism.

This is not and should not be a referendum on Islam. Whether or not you agree with the tenets of Islam ought to have little bearing on this matter. Do you think these religious leaders, reverends and rabbis are saying they believe Islam is superior to the religions they preach? Of course not.

They are standing up for the idea that any person is free to worship whatever he or she holds sacred, anywhere on the planet.


The Mosque – Dun Dun Dun | Pro MN Politics
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 2:40 pm

[...] MNIndependent [...]


Steve Carlson
Comment posted August 17, 2010 @ 9:06 am

I am familiar with some of Peg’s work, and it is useful. But as we have seen in response to Mr. Obama’s unfortunate remarks, this is not about xenophobia or religious bigotry. It is not about whether Islam is more peaceful or Christianity is more peaceful. It is about correctly applying the 1st Amendment of the Constitution to the situation on the ground at Ground Zero. The 1st Amendment is not without qualifications. You can’t shout “fire!” in a crowded theatre or engaging in fighting words and seek the protection of the 1st Amendment. With respect to 9-11 and Ground Zero, a court should look at this and see if there is a imminent danger if the project proceeds as it is. The 1st Amendment is to stop fighting wars about religion, as was done in Europe, and which led to the establishment of the Anglican church by the English King in the colonies. We should go back to its original purpose now, as we expand this tolerance which Christians founded (not a “patchwork heritage” as Obama misstated). Further, Ground Zero should be a special place in the hearts of all Americans, not just one religion. I would support plans for a truly interfaith development, which was inclusive of men of good will (and women, too) from different faiths who would participate in this development. But I would not be in favor of the present plan proceeding as is without a 1st Amendment analysis that respects all the people it protects.


Dave
Comment posted August 19, 2010 @ 6:30 pm

It’s on the same block as a strip club, dumbass, not IN ground zero.

“a court should look at this and see if there is a imminent danger if the project proceeds as it is”

Seriously? Danger from what? In the rights afforded religious institutions in this country, there is no exception for any specific religion. Which part of that concept is confusing to you?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.