Emmer dodges question on gay marriage
Monday, August 16, 2010 at 8:43 am
During a debate on Twin Cities Public Television’s Almanac on Friday evening, GOP gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer dodged a question on whether Minnesotans should have a vote on a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. The question was requested by an anti-same-sex marriage group, according to host TPT’s Kathy Wurzer. Emmer has authored a bill for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in Minnesota and has pushed against legislation that would give even a few rights to same-sex couples.
“As a citizen I have a view that is well known. As a governor, it’s not going to be up to the governor. Whether it’s somebody that says they have to oppose it, it’s not up to the governor. It’s up to the legislature,” Emmer said. “And you know what, this election is not about those issues, this election is about the economy, and it’s about jobs.”
Wurzer interrupted Emmer, “But there are a lot of issues in a campaign…”
Emmer responded, “People are trying to distract us from what we have to do, which is get the economy…”
Wurzer interrupted again, “We spent the entire hour talking about the economy. Would you let voters… Do you think voters should vote on a constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage?”
Emmer finished with, “That would be up to the legislature.”
While Independence Party candidate Tom Horner said he agreed with Emmer, it was for different reasons.
“I agree with Rep. Emmer,” he said. “I think we do need to focus on jobs. I think we do need to focus on the economy, and we have. But I’ll also say that part of our economy, part of creating jobs, is being a state in which people people can thrive, people are healthy, in which the best talent is attracted here.”
He continued, “So simply to say that equality isn’t an issue that as governor we are going to have to deal with, I think that is wrong. I think we do need to deal with equality as part of having a healthy, strong, economically viable state.”
DFL candidate Mark Dayton also said it’s an issue for the governor whether or not the governor votes on it. “It is about leadership, and the governor certainly influences the legislature,” he said. “Even if he doesn’t have a final vote on the matter. I believe the founding principle of this country is that all men are created equal, endowed by our creators with the unalienable rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
He added, “And that certainly, in this America and today, is the right to legally marry the person one loves.”
6 Comments
Pingback posted August 16, 2010 @ 9:13 am
[...] Emmer and other candidates took part in a Twin Cities Public Television’s Almanac debate, where this happened. EMMER: As a citizen I have a view that is well known. As a governor, it’s not going to be up to [...]
Comment posted August 16, 2010 @ 12:19 pm
The democrats were obviously looking for an Emmer sound bite they could use in their fund raising. I think Emmer should use Dayton’s and Horner’s comments in favor of gay marriage and use them in his TV ads. That would be interesting.
Comment posted August 16, 2010 @ 11:07 pm
Dear Mister Emmer… what makes you think anyone in Minnesota would trust you to keep your pseudo-christian, hate mongering, views out of the mix. You can’t separate the man from the job. Everything produced by you would be tainted, suspect. I’m sure you’ll eventually find a job stumping on the “hate circuit.” You can even have “You Can Run” provide some back-up tunes while you do your excellent impersonation of Osama bin Laden.
Comment posted August 17, 2010 @ 5:20 pm
I spent over $500 in K-mart, Publix this weekend alone that would normally have gone to Target. Next weekend, I’ll likely be somewhere else besides Best Buy for my nieces back to school laptop. Enjoy your $150k Mr. Emmer, it’s costing your corps.
Comment posted August 19, 2010 @ 1:30 am
What is it with this Wurzer? Can’t she stay on topic?
Comment posted December 5, 2010 @ 6:17 pm
As goes America so goes the World when it comes to new ideas. In the Czech language there is no “handy word” for “getting married” or “getting wed” which would be gender neutral (without using some convulsive term like “Matrimonying”)
When a woman gets married the word is “VDAVAT se” (To give of her self).
When a man gets married the term is “Z`ENIT se” which means (Womaning).
I don’t think there there exists a lexicon for a same sex legal union.
How do you deal with that?
Christian missionaries in Hawaii and other Pacific islands tried to teach converts about “Virgin Birth”. Alas, the islanders had no word or concept for “virginity”. Traditional Czech language has the same challenge when it comes to same sex marriage.
Curious in Los Alamos NM USA
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






