Strib: Bachmann should rethink effort to repeal Medicare reform

By Andy Birkey
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 at 8:52 am

The Star Tribune editorial board took issue with a movement among Republicans to repeal an important part of health care reform: the Independent Payment Advisory Board. The IPAB will work to reduce costs associated with Medicare, the Strib wrote on Monday. Republicans have offered a series of legislation to repeal the IPAB, and one member of Minnesota’s delegation has signed on in support: Rep. Michele Bachmann.

Bachmann was an original signer of one such repeal bill back in March when Republicans were offering a flurry of bills to repeal various portions of the recently passed health care reform legislation.

Most important perhaps is the legislation’s impact on one of Bachmann’s key issues: cost control.

“[T]hese bills would obliterate one of the most promising proposals to date to get the deficit under control,” the paper wrote. “Thankfully, only one Minnesota politician signed on as a cosponsor to either of these bills — Sixth District Rep. Michele Bachmann. Bachmann’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment Monday. Bachmann needs to rethink her support. These bills are not in Minnesota’s — or the nation’s — best interest.”

The Strib’s editorial comes after a similar one by the Washington Post:

“Lawmakers are happy to proclaim the importance of fiscal discipline and the need to get health costs under control. But they balk at taking particular steps to make that happen, especially when those steps discomfit, as they inevitably will, one special interest or another.”

The New York Times weighed in as well:

“Republicans claim to be deeply worried about the deficit — their favorite political target, followed closely by President Obama’s relentlessly demonized health care reform. So why are they so determined to overturn one of the central cost-control mechanisms of the new reform law?”

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

3 Comments

jonerik
Comment posted August 24, 2010 @ 8:57 am

Gee, what a surprise. Another stillborn idea from the walking brain-dead Bachmann.


Dennis
Comment posted August 24, 2010 @ 10:11 am

Bachmann was right to oppose this “board.” They would simply provide political cover for our elected representatives so they don’t have to get their hands dirty when the board recommends things like cuts to nursing home reimbursments or cuts to doctors who see Medicare patients. “Sorry, it wasn’t OUR idea to cut payments to your doctor who now doesn’t treat Medicare patients. The board made that call. I wouldn’t voted against it.”

Congressional boards and commissions (like Obama’s Catfood commission) exist so elected politicians have an excuse. Oppose them whenever they’re proposed.


Lou Z poher
Comment posted September 3, 2010 @ 5:09 pm

How else do you reduce costs, Dennis? If you reduce taxes you have to reduce spending. To reduce spending, at some point you have to reduce payments to doctors or nursing homes.

How else is it done? Magic???

Republicans want to force Democrats to make the necessary cuts or tax increases, so they get the blame and will lose reelection. It’s about winning elections, not doing the people’s business.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.