Emmer releases second part of budget plan, focuses on K-12 education
Friday, September 10, 2010 at 2:40 pm
Before a debate this morning on education issues, Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer released the second part of his budget plan detailing his plans for K-12 education.
Under the plan, Emmer would not begin repaying the $1.4 billion education funding shift — an accounting move to balance the state’s previous budget — until 2014. His Democratic opponent Mark Dayton plans to repay that amount over the next two years. Emmer’s delayed repayment would help reduce the projected $6 billion budget shortfall facing the next governor by the same $1.4 billion amount, though it would leave the state’s schools with less money than currently expected. Independence Party candidate Tom Horner would also delay repaying the education shift.
Emmer’s plan also said that if elected governor, he would not reduce education spending level for the next two years. “Hold K–12 education funding harmless in the next biennium,” reads the press release detailing his plan. “State general fund spending for FY 2010–11 is set at $13.8 billion. Tom Emmer is committed to ensure that this critical spending of the budget is not reduced.”
But shortly after this morning’s debate Dayton answered Emmer’s plan with a press release arguing that the Republican is disingenuous in claiming that spending $13 billion for education is not a cut.
According to the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget’s General Fund Balance Analysis, End of 2010 Legislative Sessions dated June 11, 2010 on page 1, line G, current law requires the state general fund to provide $15,621,575,000 in funding for K-12 education in the next biennium.
To limit K-12 education funding to $13,300,000,000 as Rep. Emmer is proposing, instead of $15,621,575,000 as required by law, he would have to cut funding by $2,321,575,000. That is a 14.9% cut to K-12 education funding for the next biennium.
The first part of Emmer’s budget proposal came out on Monday and focused on how he would improve employment on the state, consisting entirely of tax breaks for corporations and reduced government regulations. Emmer’s campaign will announce the third and final part of his budget plan next week, which will detail how Emmer plans to close the expected $6 billion budget gap.
This last part has been the most anticipated and unclear aspect of Emmer’s plan, as the Republican has vowed to not raise taxes. Dayton’s campaign is centered around a proposal to raise the tax burden of the state’s top earners in order to correct the majority of the shortfall.
Patrick Caldwell is the American Independent’s Minnesota correspondent.
13 Comments
Comment posted September 10, 2010 @ 4:05 pm
Tom Emmer is the answer for MN. His unique ideas to solve the budget problems are clearly far ahead of this opponents.
Pingback posted September 10, 2010 @ 8:19 pm
[...] Read more here. [...]
Comment posted September 10, 2010 @ 10:02 pm
The ideas behind cutting 14.9% from K-12 education funding for the next biennium is as “unique” as a mosquito in my backyard, and doesn’t benefit but hurts the state of Minnesota in the long run. No “answer,” Mr. Emmmr is just another right-wing pinhead like Po-lenty that values money over the people of this state.
Cutting budgets without identifying and getting public support for expenditures that deserve to be cut is a cowardly exercise spineless conservatives love to do, year after year.
Comment posted September 11, 2010 @ 7:21 am
Tim,
Are you nuts? Seriously? If I unilaterally said, “I’m just not going to pay a major debt of mine for 4 years,” I’d be taken to court. Emmer’s plan is, like all Republicans’, simply to push off payment of important social costs onto the next, presumably Democratic, administration.
Republicans will do this until they are repudiated at the polls, because it makes political hay for them – in order to fix the damage they’ve done, it forces Democrats to raise taxes, which allows the GOP a narrative where they love to cut taxes, and the evil nanny-stater Democrats want to raise them. In fact it has nothing to do with taxes and everything to do with establishing, in the words of Karl Rove, a “permanent Republican majority” that is effectively a tyranny where 50% of the population is permanently disenfranchised.
Comment posted September 11, 2010 @ 8:55 am
Good call Katie Tim is nuts Minnesota is not in debt because of Jesse Ventura Minnesota is in debt because of Tim Pawlenty and Tom Emmer is another jackass republican like Tim and Michelle.
Comment posted September 11, 2010 @ 1:35 pm
The right to a free and appropriate education is a constitutional right in Minnesota.
Yet governors feel free to play partisan political games with their constitutional responsibility to fund the schools.
Delaying payments only raises costs to the schools, but on a more micro, more expensive level as each district has to get it’s own financing to cover the hole left because the State won’t raise the revenue required to pay for it’s obligations.
To pretend that such budget shifts by governors are conservative measures to hold the line on taxes is a lie, and a darn hypocritical one at that.
Pingback posted September 11, 2010 @ 6:20 pm
[...] the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget’s General Fund Balance Analysis, End of 2010 Legislative Sessions on June 11 stipulates that current law requires the state general [...]
Comment posted September 12, 2010 @ 4:02 pm
Another borrow-and-spend republican unwilling to be honest about taxes. He would drive up fees and regressive local taxes just to claim that he did not (personally and directly) raise taxes.
We’ve had enough of economic dishonesty and slumlord politics.
Comment posted September 13, 2010 @ 1:16 pm
Again, I apologize as it was NOT me making the stupid comments. I am truly sorry for the actions of a so-called “friend.”
Comment posted September 13, 2010 @ 1:17 pm
Again I’m sorry for a comment another person made using my computer. I truly am.
Comment posted September 14, 2010 @ 1:43 pm
“To limit K-12 education funding to $13,300,000,000 as Rep. Emmer is proposing, instead of $15,621,575,000 as required by law, he would have to cut funding by $2,321,575,000. That is a 14.9% cut to K-12 education funding for the next biennium.”
Not spending a DFL union cram down is not a cut. It is a rational response to lack of funds. Can anyone justify a 15% increase over the next two years?
And can anyone tell me why a child in Minneapolis is worth more than a child in Plymouth or Eden Prarie, according to the State of MN per child local school support?
Comment posted September 15, 2010 @ 8:25 pm
Emmer is the least damaging of the three candidates, the other two just want to continue spending like there is no limit. We need private sector growth not government growth.
Comment posted September 15, 2010 @ 9:46 pm
We need a governor that won’t put off his work. Ideas and solutions, not procrastination.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







