Veterans respond to GOP chair’s comment about ‘quisling’ Horner supporters
Thursday, October 07, 2010 at 2:59 pm
Independence Party gubernatorial candidate Tom Horner has been picking off endorsements from former Republican legislators, from past Gov. Arne Carlson and former U.S. Sen. Dave Durenberger to a slate of 13 former statehouse legislators who yesterday announced their support for his candidacy. That announcement drew the ire of state GOP Chair Tony Sutton, who responded by stating, “There’s a special place in hell for these quislings.” Two of those former legislators — veterans of the Korean War and World War II — responded to Sutton today in a letter, writing that they found it “demeaning” that their choice to support Horner drew comparisons to Nazi sympathizer and traitor Vidkun Quisling.
On Thursday, Sutton backed off the statement slightly, stating he only meant that the GOPers backing Horner are traitors, not Nazis.
On Thursday, Sutton told the AP he used the word as a common term for traitor.
“It would be like saying someone’s a Benedict Arnold,” Sutton said, explaining his use of the word the rarely used term “quisling.” “To make it out to be something other than that would be ridiculous.”
That didn’t stop Horner from responding Thursday afternoon.
“I was disappointed to see the chair of the Republican Party compare some of those veterans and former public servants to traitors of the worst degree simply due to their support of my candidacy for governor,” Horner said in a statement. “The comments were disrespectful and uncalled for.”
Horner’s campaign also sent out a letter from two of the legislators who decided to back Horner yesterday, former Sen. Bill Belanger, an Army veteran who served in Korea, and former Sen. George Pillsbury, a Marine who served during World War II. Needless to say, the duo was displeased at Sutton’s choice of words.
“Those of us who support Horner and his centrist view of governance have nothing in common with Norwegian politician Vidkun Quisling, a Nazi sympathizer who collaborated with the Germans to enslave millions of his countrymen during the Second World War,” they wrote. “We proudly wore the uniforms of our nation, one of us as a Marine Lieutenant in the Philippines during World War II, one of us a few years later in Korea as an Army Corporal. For you to besmirch that service is demeaning.”
The DFL pounced on the statement. Party chair Brian Melendez said, “I wonder what’s going on inside the Republican Party that Tony Sutton feels the need to send a message that you are going to hell and we liken you to Nazi sympathizers if you support Tom Horner.”
Here’s the full text of Belanger and Pillsbury’s letter:
October 7, 2010
Tony Sutton
Chairman, Republican Party of Minnesota
525 Park Street, Suite 250St. Paul, MN 55103
Mr. Sutton:
As veterans of the United States military and former state legislators, we were highly offended to pick up our morning Star Tribune newspaper and read that you were accusing us of being traitors to our country for supporting Tom Horner for governor. (“There’s a special place in hell for these quislings.”)
Those of us who support Horner and his centrist view of governance have nothing in common with Norwegian politician Vidkun Quisling, a Nazi sympathizer who collaborated with the Germans to enslave millions of his countrymen during the Second World War. We proudly wore the uniforms of our nation, one of us as a Marine Lieutenant in the Philippines during World War II, one of us a few years later in Korea as an Army Corporal. For you to besmirch that service is demeaning.
We support Tom Horner for governor precisely because we care so much about our state and our nation. We sought elective office after our years of military service because we care about our country and its future. We did not believe our service ended when we were discharged. For decades, we have continued to volunteer in our communities to make our society stronger.
We are supporting Tom Horner for governor because we believe his moderate, centrist view of government is precisely what Minnesota needs right now. We are concerned that Sutton’s candidate, Tom Emmer, is too far to the right, and that Mark Dayton, the Democrat, is too far to the left. We believe it is best for all concerned to have a governor who can work with both political parties, to do what’s right and not worry about who gets the credit.
We went to war to defend the Constitution, which included fighting for your right of free speech, so you are free to say whatever you want. We would appreciate it if, in the future, you were more careful not to criticize American veterans just because you disagree with our choice of candidates.
Sincerely,
George Pillsbury
First Lieutenant, United States Marine Corp (ret)
Veteran of World War II
Former State Senator, WayzataBill Belanger
Corporal, United States Army (ret)
Veteran of the Korean War
Former State Senator, Bloomington
14 Comments
Comment posted October 7, 2010 @ 3:18 pm
I must say I respect the elloquence of the rebuttal by Pillsbury and Belanger. There is no room in our society for bullies like Tony Sutton. He exposed his true colors when he made these truly offensive statements. I wonder how many republicans will ask for Sutton to fully appologize for his statements?
Comment posted October 7, 2010 @ 4:02 pm
If this is the kind of foul inaccurate accusations Sutton makes to members of his own party what are we to think of his accusations about DFLers? Can we assume that the man leading the GOP in Minnesota has lost his mind to accuse his own members of being Nazi sympathizers? I expect the man to publicly apologize and to in fact step down from his post… before he is thrown out when Emmer loses this election.
I’m waiting for the rest of the GOP to distance themselves from this man and his scurrilous remarks. If they do not denounce Tony Sutton we can assume they also believe that respected veterans are Nazis.
Comment posted October 7, 2010 @ 4:06 pm
I’m guessing Tony Sutton has never served in the military.
Comment posted October 7, 2010 @ 5:26 pm
Ouch. What a (necessary) take down of Sutton. I hope he takes some time for reflection.
Comment posted October 7, 2010 @ 11:16 pm
There are still good Republicans in Minnesota. Moderate Republicans. Republicans who were marginalized when the GOP came in and took over the IR. If enough of them rally around the IP, they can send the message to the GOP that they cannot keep marching further to the right and just assume everyone will follow. Perhaps these “traitors” can bring sanity back to the republican party. The intolerance is getting old.
Comment posted October 8, 2010 @ 1:57 am
Sutton must have slept through history class in high school. You’d think he would have learned by now NOT to use Nazi words to make comparisons with anything in current events.
Pingback posted October 8, 2010 @ 8:00 am
[...] radio broadcast will be November 12 (will he pursue other professional endeavors?); and state GOP chair Tony Sutton is under fire from the Horner gubernatorial campaign after having the audacity and distaste to call World War II veteran and former Republican state [...]
Comment posted October 8, 2010 @ 10:38 am
Why is it less offensive to be Benedict Arnold? He sold out to the British in a fit of jealous pique, and endangered the cause of American independence.
The part about damming people to hell for political disloyalty–that we’ll just pass over.
Comment posted October 9, 2010 @ 12:44 pm
One thing Sutton’s remark did was make my choice for governor TOM HORNER!! I’ve been a Republican since I was in elementary school. Adios, G.O.P. I’m going to support all the Independence candidates and hope that I can encourage others to do the same!
Comment posted October 10, 2010 @ 1:02 pm
Carol,
C’mon, Sutton’s proper use of a big and obscure word caused you to switch from Conservative” no tax hike Tom” to”Big Spending Tax Hike Liberal Tom”? If so, I guess the use of “Niggardly” by the DEMOCRATS in Washington DC has caused you to never vote for them nor visit DC, eh? Why is it the left is always trying to censor the proper use of words in the English Language?
Comment posted October 10, 2010 @ 4:46 pm
fromo,
I don’t think that the non-proper word niggard means what you think it means or what you’d like to imply that it means. It’s a cheap shot.
Just like it’s a cheap shot to imply that a WW2 veteran is traitor and going to hell because of his choice for governor.
Can’t you guys make an argument without going off the rails about it?
Comment posted October 10, 2010 @ 7:45 pm
I know exactly what “Niggardly” means.
–adjective
1.
reluctant to give or spend; stingy; miserly.
2.
meanly or ungenerously small or scanty: a niggardly tip to a waiter.
People went off the rails excoriating the guy who used it properly. They were Democrats, and I really doubt they knew what it means. As long as it sounds bad, it must be bad., right?.
Comment posted October 12, 2010 @ 7:47 pm
I say that Horner is an effective vote spliter. The Democrats may, or may not, have had something to do with him running, I don’t know.
I do know he is more Democrat than Republican. The only things that really seperates the two parties anymore are social issues(global warming fits here) and fisical conservatism. Horner is a social liberal at least, fisicaly, I’m not sure.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







