Freeman: No election fraud buttons in polling places

By Andy Birkey
Thursday, October 28, 2010 at 8:30 am

Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman told Talking Points Memo on Wednesday that the county won’t allow political buttons in polling places. Election Integrity Watch, a conservative anti-voter fraud group, has announced a campaign that includes anti-voter fraud buttons, and it says it will challenge Freeman’s decision.

“You can’t wear campaign buttons in a polling place, state law says you can’t,” said Freeman, a DFLer. “And election judges can’t even wear, you know, ‘Stamp Out Election Fraud.’ So that’s going to be interesting in the next few days.”

But Dan MacGrath of Minnesota Majority told the Minnesota Independent that his group is prepared to challenge that ban, although he acknowledged it wouldn’t have much impact on the group’s anti-fraud campaign, which includes a $500 reward for successful prosecution of voter fraud as well as distribution of buttons that say “Please ID Me.”

“If it holds up [to a legal challenge], it won’t have much impact, except for the loss of a visible fraud deterrent in the polling place,” he said. “We believe the decision violates the First Amendment and Minnesota statute. I’ve been on contact with Hennepin County Elections about this and am waiting to see the written memo.”

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

10 Comments

Dave Porter
Comment posted October 28, 2010 @ 10:40 am

Meetings for “Election Integrity Watch” are surely open to the public, since this is such an important matter for all concerned.

Presumably those evil immigrants (at least those who are “browner than a manila envelope”) will be somehow infiltrating this group’s tactical organization and finding out where the threat is greatest.

The actual crime being accomplished most often by snowbirds voting in both their northern homes and their southern wintering spots in Florida, Alabama, Texas, Arizona…


EricF
Comment posted October 28, 2010 @ 12:21 pm

Dave has a point. A reason for all those arcane rules we learned about with absentee ballots during the recount is that the only real instances of organized voter fraud I’ve heard of involved absentee ballots, though I suppose we could argue even then that’s election fraud, since charges involved parties suddenly producing a bunch of absentee ballots.

McGrath might want to reconsider appealing. That’s clearly a partisan button since it’s an initiative from one party, even if technically independent, so getting that rule tossed would likely mean allowing candidate buttons too.


Zera Lee
Comment posted October 29, 2010 @ 1:49 am

I do not think that the First Amendment covers voter intimidation and interfering with the election process.

Why do these people think that their rights supersede everyone else’s at all times?


Phoenix Woman
Comment posted October 29, 2010 @ 9:09 am

If anyone sees any instances of suspected voter intimidation, particularly in and around college campuses and low-income neighborhoods where voter-intimidation groups want to scare poor and twentysomething voters into thinking that it’s illegal for them to vote, call 1-866-OUR-VOTE and report it to the non-partisan Election Protection people: http://www.866ourvote.org/


Dagny
Comment posted October 29, 2010 @ 10:40 am

When 75% of Minnesotans support an initiative, as they do Voter ID requirements, it’s not possible that the movement is “partisan.” What party or candidate would a “Please ID me” button promote, EricF?

Let’s have a little precision in our use of the English language, please. Partisan means, promoting a political party or candidate. It doesn’t mean, “supporting causes I’m suspicious of and believe must be funded and promoted by people I disagree with.”


Stormer
Comment posted October 29, 2010 @ 11:49 am

Dagny. Yes, let’s be clear. Where do you get the 75% support for Voter ID? Be precise and clearly cite your sources.


Lane
Comment posted October 29, 2010 @ 2:05 pm

Thank you, Stormer. You beat me to that comment. Sheesh.


Zera Lee
Comment posted October 29, 2010 @ 5:53 pm

Anyone who thinks that Voter ID is a non-partisan issue is not paying attention.

One need look no further than the comments of this article to see the political division.


StPaulCD4Voter
Comment posted October 30, 2010 @ 7:14 am

What’s all the fuss about voter fraud? Rep Betty McCollum says its not a problem in this country. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UteJgOzkhVw


Mill
Comment posted October 30, 2010 @ 1:56 pm

There is no voter fraud problem in Minnesota. It’s just more baseless fear-mongering by right wing people who just know there are scary monsters under their bed at night.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.