Pawlenty defends potential prez rival Palin
Monday, November 01, 2010 at 5:10 pm
In a Politico article published online on Sunday, Sarah Palin was treated to harsh attacks from unnamed Republican operatives. The article alleged that top Republicans close to other GOPers contemplating 2012 presidential runs have coalesced around opposing Palin as the party’s nominee. Mike Allen and Jim Vandehei reported:
Interviews with advisers to the main 2012 presidential contenders and with other veteran Republican operatives make clear they see themselves on a common, if uncoordinated, mission of halting the momentum and credibility Palin gained with conservative activists by plunging so aggressively into this year’s midterm campaigns.
Palin immediately fired back at the article, challenging the authors’ reliance of solely speaking with anonymous officials. “Having unnamed sources in an article like this is very, very disappointing,” Palin said in a Fox News appearance.
Current Palin allies who may turn into political foes if Palin runs for president rushed to the former Alaska governor’s defense today. Outgoing Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who has openly mulled a presidential run once his current term in office ends in January, went on Twitter Monday afternoon to attack the Politico piece. From Pawlenty’s Twitter account:
Politico story is way off. Palin deserves great credit for all her work on GOP’s behalf.
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney — a 2008 presidential candidate who is likely to make another bid in 2012 — also supported Palin today. “She would be a great thing for the Republican primary process,” Romney said on the Laura Ingraham radio program. Both Romney and Pawlenty were cited by name as top Republicans concerned about a Palin presidential run in the Politico article.
The Republican politicians flirting with presidential campaigns have to be careful in what they can say at this point about their potential rivals. In advance of the midterm elections Tuesday, those Republicans have walked a fine line in creating the infrastructure for a campaign without doing so publicly for fear of distracting from the Republican cause to win control of Congress on Nov. 2. So when a politician such as Pawlenty visits Iowa, he goes not directly campaigning for himself, but publicly working to support the local GOP candidates.
Part of this equation is that all potential 2012 Republicans must appear as one big, happy family at the moment, even if they may be running campaigns against one another next spring. Some have appeared at events together this fall in support of other Republicans. But shows of unity and validation for their soon-to-be opponents could backfire once they launch their presidential campaigns. It will be significantly harder for Romney to argue in a debate that Palin is unqualified to run for president when she can point to his statement that her running is a “great thing.”
This tightrope will be particularly difficult for the other candidates to traverse when they are discussing Palin. She has crafted an image of herself as the embattled conservative, attacked by the forces of the elite, a theme fully embraced by her tea party supporters. If more “traditional” Republican candidates employ the same mainstream attacks against the former Alaska governor, it may backfire and simply entrench her support among base GOP voters.
8 Comments
Comment posted November 1, 2010 @ 7:59 pm
I so hope she is the Republican pick for 2012. I hope. I hope. I hope. Can you even imagine her performance in any national debate? Now that will be “must see” TV.
Comment posted November 1, 2010 @ 10:40 pm
Hey Kevin. I remember reading those same words, almost verbatim, back in 1980 when the democrats drooled over the possibility of that know-nothing Ronald Reagan running against their beloved James Earl Carter.
heh
Comment posted November 2, 2010 @ 12:00 am
I too very much hope that Palin runs.
Reagan could actually form grammatical sentences and had a discernible order to his thinking, despite his superficial grasp of policy issues.
Palin–where to begin? One critic described her verbal/thought style as a “word cloud.” You don’t have to listen to many of her extemporaneous utterances to realize that she can barely fire up enough neurons to, um, make identifiably English statements, and not much else. No wonder the baggers of tea love her. In her shallowness and sometimes incoherence, she’s speaking their language.
For the first time in my life I might actually donate to a Republican campaign.
Comment posted November 2, 2010 @ 1:03 pm
I love it when the left can not argue on policy so they atack the person. If they had doner that with the current Pres. they would have realized that a community orginizer should not be the Pres.
Comment posted November 2, 2010 @ 3:37 pm
Re: MIKE
You are correct Mike. Liberals argue from within the seat of their pants. At birth they are taught to cry, lie, and spend other people’s money while sitting on their butts with their hands open under the table to receive gratuities.
Sarah talks straighty forward, and doesn’t LIE…Liberals don’t recognize the Truth on issues because they don’t understand the issues…they just attack the person with more skill and knowledge than they…Sarah won’t attack you…do it…so I’ll do it for our Madam President 2012
Comment posted November 2, 2010 @ 3:51 pm
So Mike, please tell me the scoop on the Palin policies. Other than the NO MORE TAXES crap, what is she all about? Oh yes, I forgot protecting marriage from the nasty homosexuals, but give me some real specifics. Yes, she has a whole boat load of tired, old bumper sticker zingers she likes to shout out at the drop of a hat, but what else? What specifically would she do with the country?
Comment posted November 5, 2010 @ 5:28 pm
Neither one of these morons is fit to run this country, both lying sack of crap tea party jackasses that know nothing about how anything works in the world.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







