The House wing of the U.S. Capitol. Photo: Jim Armstrong, Flickr
The House wing of the U.S. Capitol. Photo: Jim Armstrong, Flickr

Kline, Paulsen, Peterson vote against middle-class tax relief

By Andy Birkey
Friday, December 03, 2010 at 9:21 am

Democrat Collin Peterson joined Republican Reps. John Kline, Erik Paulsen and Michele Bachmann in voting against an extension of the Bush tax cuts for those making less than $250,000. The middle-class tax relief measure passed the U.S. House on Thursday by a vote of 234 to 188. Although Bachmann didn’t vote, she had plenty to say about the bill.

“The proposal by House Democrat leaders to only extend tax cuts for the middle class is not sufficient for our nation’s economy and would not have my support,” Bachmann said in a statement. “Our economy desperately needs new jobs, but the President and House Democrats still want to raise taxes on our nation’s job creators. Tax cuts must be extended for all.”

Blue Dog Peterson was one of only 20 Democrats voting against the measure. The Democratic Congress has decided to allow the Bush-era tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 to expire. Opponents called for the tax cuts to be extended beyond the middle class to include the wealthiest Americans. Some Republicans even called the vote a tax increase.

Republican Rep. Tom Graves of Georgia said, “A vote for this bill is a vote to raise taxes on millions of American families and small business owners.”

Minority Leader John Boehner called the bill “chicken crap.”

That’s not how Democrats put it.

“By cutting taxes for the middle-class, we put money into the pockets of small businesses and hard-working families who will spend it at the local grocery store or on fixing up their homes,” said Rep. Tim Walz in a statement. “Growing our economy and creating jobs will help us tackle the long-term national debt facing our country.”

In a statement, Rep. Keith Ellison, who voted for the measure along with fellow Democrats James Oberstar and Betty McCollum, said that the bill would benefit 97 percent of American families, who would each save around $1,000 per year.

“Sadly, while my Republican colleagues insist on saddling America’s middle class families with debt to pay for tax breaks for billionaires, they refuse to extend unemployment benefits for Americans who cannot find work amid the Republican recession,” he said.

Here’s the roll call for the vote.

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

12 Comments

Sam
Comment posted December 3, 2010 @ 9:50 am

Headline should read:
Tim Waltz, Keith Ellison, James Oberstar and Betty McCollum vote for Job killing Tax increase on small business.
There was a reason that Democrats were thrown out of office.
People want a pay check not a welfare check.


Pat
Comment posted December 3, 2010 @ 11:52 am

If they want the tax cut extended for those 97% of Americans who make below $250,000 they should have voted for it. They can deal with the other 3% – where the parties disagree – later. At least let the majority of the people relax and know their taxes won’t go up. The headline should be exactly what it is, because that’s what they did. By the way, Democrats were not thrown out of Washington. . Democrats won enough elections to hold the Senate. Every Democrat tin Congress was elected by the people. “the people” are not just Republicans and the newest members of Congress”. We ALL still live here.


Pat
Comment posted December 3, 2010 @ 11:56 am

New poll: Just 26 percent of Americans say they support extending the cuts for all Americans, even those earning above the $250,000 level, which is the GOP proposal.


Jim B
Comment posted December 3, 2010 @ 12:07 pm

FIRST smart thing I have seen the Dem’s do in 2 years!!


Dennis
Comment posted December 3, 2010 @ 12:42 pm

No one believes any polls from See B.S. news. Even democrat congressmen.

This is a meaningless vote because it’ll fail in the senate. The only plan that will pass in both the house and the senate is the one that extends the tax rates for ALL taxpayers, not just some.

The class warfare and mob rule of the democrats is coming to an end in January and everyone will be treated equally for a change.


EricF
Comment posted December 3, 2010 @ 4:45 pm

Dennis, all taxpayers DO get the cut. Even hedge fund managers get a cut on the first $250,000. They just have to pay on the next billion. Considering the billionaires got saved in the bailouts while the rest of us sacrificed, seems fair to me.


Marcus
Comment posted December 3, 2010 @ 5:36 pm

It’s Frikkin AMAZING how many names the Republitard party has Nowadays!!

1) Republican
2) Conservative ( LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!)
3) Independent
4) Tea Baggers ( Like these NuttBalls even studied the true Boston Tea Party)\
5) BLUE DOGS!!! These are the MOST COWARDLY REPUBLICANS of ALL!!!

I find it AMAZING that a “Blue Dog” ( Extreme Right Winger) could even make it in the Greatest State in the Nation…


LadyKofOlmsted
Comment posted December 4, 2010 @ 9:38 am

The Democrats in Congress voted to keep the Tax Cuts for the MIddle Class and those earning up to $250,000 jointly, $200,000 Individually from going up in January of 2011..

The Republicans voted to RAISE Taxes on the Middle Class.

The Upper 2% of wage earners are doing fine. The “job creators” the Republicans want to protect, have been deficiant in stemming the loss of jobs prior to the Stimulus passing. That was when an average of 700,000 jobs were being lost fom late 2007 into the summer of 2009. There have been 10 straight months of Private Secotor job growth in 2010. More this year than in GWB’s 8 years! That has to acount for something!


Dennis
Comment posted December 4, 2010 @ 12:51 pm

“There have been 10 straight months of Private Secotor job growth in 2010. More this year than in GWB’s 8 years! That has to acount for something!”

And the unemployment rate has been at 9.5% or higher for 16 straight months. That’s the longest stretch since the 1930s. In October of 2006, just 3 months before the democrats took over congress, unemployment was 4.4%.

http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2006/nov/wk1/art01.htm


Kevin
Comment posted December 4, 2010 @ 4:13 pm

So why is no one paying attention to statements like this from Warren Buffet – one of the richest men around:

“Warren Buffet complained that he paid a 17.7% tax rate on his $46 million of taxable income in 2006, while his employees paid an average 32.9% tax rate (his receptionist’s tax rate was 30%).”

Yes in case you didn’t hear, he is all in FAVOR of raising his own taxes.


Minnesota Central
Comment posted December 5, 2010 @ 7:07 am

Where has Ms. Bachmann been ?

Besides missing this vote, she also missed the vote to re-authorize the Child Nutrition program (Read more here which discusses how the House had to write a special piece of legislation just to appease John Kline.)

BTW, can we put this into perspective … if $52,029 is the median household income, and aren’t they really the Job Creators ?
The average family is the one that supports the local businesses … they buy groceries and pay property taxes … they keep the economies going.
Now, on the other hand, consider that there are approximately 146,000 (0.1%) households with incomes exceeding $1,500,000 a year. Even at that, the top 0.01% of households had incomes of $5,500,000 and accounted for 11,000 households. The 400 highest tax payers in the nation brought in a stunning $87,000,000 a year. Now that is wealth.

What would be the lifestyle impact of a 3% tax increase on those top earners ?

How many fewer jobs would they support if they had to pay the higher taxes … my guess none.


Jay Banks
Comment posted December 7, 2010 @ 12:05 pm

Great summary Andy,

Middle class folks will soon find that they do not qualify for the child credit, that some of their illations may be severely limited and their current tax bill will go up $ 500 – 1500. I think that the rich are rich, because they resulted out how to do or create something with market value. Politicians do not want to take responsibility for their bad judgement so they play mind games with people. And these games are intolerant !


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.