In the days leading up to the Republican National Convention, a series of police raids led by the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office resulted in the arrest of eight people for allegedly conspiring to disrupt the political gathering. On Wednesday the individuals were each charged with a single count of “conspiracy to commit riot in the second degree in furtherance of terrorism.” The criminal complaint details a far-ranging plot by members of the RNC Welcoming Committee that included plans to kidnap delegates, attack cops with urine and molotov cocktails and ultimately bring the convention to a halt.
The charge carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. A ninth individual was also arrested earlier this week and is named in the criminal complaint, but has not yet been charged. All but the latter suspect have been released on $75,000 bail.
Yesterday afternoon attorneys for the alleged co-conspirators held a press conference to rebut the charges. They portrayed the allegations as a trumped-up plot hyped by confidential informants who had a financial incentive to exaggerate the potential violence. “The most outrageous allegations made by the authorities are not supported by any evidence other than the statement of the confidential informants,” said attorney Bruce Nestor. “They’re not supported by the evidence seized.”
In one instance, for example, officers seized what was purportedly a police shield and cited it as evidence of the group’s ill intents. “We have the Sheriff displaying a single plastic item that he claims was a shield, as if one shield was going to protect demonstrators from 3500 armed riot police who have projectile-tear-gas weapons,” said Nestor.
The trio of lawyers also charged that police are utilizing terrorism fears to circumvent First Amendment rights. “All they do is they label people as terrorists and anarchists, and at that point what people are actually saying and the content of their views has no meaning anymore,” said attorney Jordan Kushner. “What they do is they dehumanize people, they stigmatize them and in the process cut off what they’re saying.”
Kushner compared the case to the treatment of the Chicago Seven in 1968 — all of whom were ultimately acquitted of conspiracy charges. “Of course that made complete fools out of the government,” he said. “When the evidence comes out in this case it’s going to be the same thing. It’s going to be about politically opportunistic, abusive, cynical people in power who are abusing the law to suppress political dissent and suppress political organizing.”
Three of the defendants — Luce Guillen-Givins, Robert Joseph Czernik and Max Jacob Specktor — were present at the press conference but did not answer questions from reporters. However, two of the defendants’ parents did comment on the charges.
Mordecai Specktor, father of Max (pictured together) and editor of the American Jewish World newspaper, stated that his son was held in solitary confinement for two days before being released on bail. “The criminal complaint here is farfetched, overblown, outrageous,” he said. “I encourage all the journalists here to look into the specifics of this complaint and see where the truth really lies.” Specktor then put his arm around his son. “This is your domestic terrorist,” he said. “Take a good look. I don’t believe it at all. Give me a break.”
The other defendants are Nathanael David Secor, Erik Charles Oseland, Monica Rachel Bicking and Garrett Scott Fitzgerald.














7 Comments »
Comment posted September 5, 2008 @ 12:42 pm
Unfortunately for the “minnesota 9″, the prosecution is in possession of physical evidence (caltrops & etc.), electronic and written correspondence and the testimony of LEO's that had infiltrated the RNCWC. None of which was available to the Illinois prosecutors.
While our lefty domestic terrorists seem not to have learned a thing since '68, the police have been taking graduate courses.
I'm guessing that, with good behavior, these little assholes might see the light of day again in, oh, three years or so.
Comment posted September 5, 2008 @ 6:22 pm
Huh. Well, after the discovery phase, we'll ALL have a little better picture of what those kids had. I would guess it won't equal what your guys in Denver had.
And they didn't have “caltrops” or buckets of urine, they had the wingnut party favors of choice- meth and guns.
http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/03/fbi-wanted-ob...
Comment posted September 5, 2008 @ 8:10 pm
These were just nice kids coming to town to get a Starbucks .
Comment posted September 5, 2008 @ 9:48 pm
Wow, Woot: Are you a member of the prosecution? How do you know what evidence there is against these kids?
Anyway, these kids made a big mistake: if they would have plotted to kill the Democratic candidate for president, rather than just mess up the RNC convention, they might have gotten a break.
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/6857/court-d...
It pays to be on the “right” side.
Comment posted September 7, 2008 @ 6:51 pm
You're full of shit, cop
Comment posted September 22, 2008 @ 10:42 am
What is the phrase? “if you don’t stand behind our troops/government/police/whatever, then feel free to stand in front of them”? If our government and its enforcement agencies stand for silencing dissenters, than I would much rather stand in front of them with a raised fist than cringe behind them like a coward… something you are no stranger to w00t I am certain.
Where would our country be if unpopular dissenters were not persistent and radical? Did you know less than 25% of the entire nation supported the Boston Tea Party, and even less condemned the actions of the British during the Boston Massacre? Unpopular dissent is the key ideal this nation was founded upon, and for you to make light of the efforts of these people to be heard puts you in league with the Crown Loyalists of the 1770’s… certainly a very un-American camp to be associated with isn’t it w00t?
Do some research, a majority of our founding fathers were decidedly Libertarian/Anarchist in principles
A man who sacrifices an ounce of liberty in exchange for security deserves neither liberty nor security
~Benjamin Franklin
Comment posted November 1, 2008 @ 2:47 pm
shut up ya knee jerk reactionary
what lesson are we to glean from 68?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment