Religious leaders call on Rep. West to apologize over remarks about Rep. Ellison
Thursday, February 03, 2011 at 9:33 am
Jewish and Baptist leaders are among those calling on Rep. Allen West to apologize for remarks he made about Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress. West told a Florida radio station that Ellison represents the “antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established.” The faith leaders told West that his remarks were “neither appropriate, nor true to the American values that you reference.”
The letter writers include Interfaith Alliance president Rev. Welton Gaddy, the director of public policy for the Rabbinical Assembly Rabbi Jack Moline, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism Rabbi David Saperstein and The Rev. J. Brent Walker, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.
Of Ellison and his Muslim faith, Rep. West told radio host Richard Peritz, “Well I think it’s most important that I stand upon the principles that people elected me to go to Washington, D.C., and represent them on Capitol Hill.”
He added, “So that when you run into someone that is counter, or someone that really does represent the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established, you’ve got to be able to defeat them intellectually in debate and discourse, and you to just have to be able to challenge each and every one of their assertions very wisely and very forthright.”
Late last week, Ellison offered a statement in response to West’s comments:
I was surprised to hear of Congressman West’s comments because he has never expressed these sentiments to me directly.
Contrary to the views expressed by Congressman West, I work to represent the highest ideals of our great nation – ideals like freedom of worship and respect for all faiths, equal protection under the law as well as a civil and open public discourse.
I call on Americans of all colors, cultures and faiths to turn to each other, not on each other, especially in the renewed spirit of finding a more respectful and productive public dialogue.
Americans across the country want their public servants to reject the toxic and corrosive chatter that yields more heat than light. I hope to have a productive and respectful dialogue with all of my colleagues, including Allen West.
In their letter, the faith leaders criticized West’s statement as being contrary to American values.
“Regardless of the specific ‘principles’ you intended to reference, it is an indisputable fact that one of those principles is religious freedom for all, memorialized in the United States Constitution—including, of course, Article VI’s prohibition on any religious test for public office,” they wrote. “Your remarks disrespect not only your Muslim colleagues in the Congress, but also all of your constituents of the Muslim faith. This is neither appropriate, nor true to the American values that you reference.”
Here’s the full text of the letter sent to West:
February 2, 2011
The Honorable Allen West
1708 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515Dear Representative West,
As leaders of national Jewish, Christian and interfaith organizations that celebrate religious freedom and diversity, we write to you today with deep concern over your recent criticisms of Islam and its adherents.
In a recent interview with the “Shalom Show,” you underscored that your mission is to represent and uphold the values of your constituents; this is an unquestionably noble goal. However, your subsequent statement that Representative Keith Ellison, one of your colleagues in the House of Representatives, is the “antithesis of the principles on which this country was established” because he is Muslim, shows a frightening lack of understanding for these values. Regardless of the specific “principles” you intended to reference, it is an indisputable fact that one of those principles is religious freedom for all, memorialized in the United States Constitution—including, of course, Article VI’s prohibition on any religious test for public office. Your remarks disrespect not only your Muslim colleagues in the Congress, but also all of your constituents of the Muslim faith. This is neither appropriate, nor true to the American values that you reference.
Regrettably, this is just the latest example of your tendency to offer intemperate comments about Islam. At a town hall meeting during your campaign, you characterized Islam as America’s enemy and asserted, “Islam is a totalitarian, theocratic political ideology; it is not a religion.” Such untrue and inflammatory remarks intensify an unsettling trend of anti-Muslim rhetoric and fear in our country. They are also likely to confuse your constituents as to the differences between radical, Islamic extremists and non-violent adherents to Islam. Many peaceable Muslims live in your district and two serve alongside you in the House of Representatives. At a time when Islamophobia is on the rise, it is the responsibility of our elected officials to promote dialogue, understanding and civility in the public forum.
In the “Shalom Show” interview, you spoke of the need for our nation’s children to be educated about our Constitution and our history; this is a goal we of course share and a pursuit in which we hope you will participate as well. It is essential that America’s children learn of our Founders’ commitment to the venerable religious freedoms that for more than 200 years have protected all persons of faith and of no faith. Equally important is the role that diverse peoples have had in forming our nation, including the oft-attacked American Muslim community whose members have been part of our nation since its inception.
Although your laudable decision to offer yourself for public service in no way disqualifies you from discussing your own faith, we urge you not to use the prestige of your position in the U.S. House of Representatives to proselytize for one religion or demonize another. Rather, we hope that you will seek opportunities to uphold the religious freedom of all of your colleagues and constituents, including Muslims, to believe in or to reject any religious faith, as they choose. This freedom is an integral part of American democracy and promised by the First Amendment to our Constitution. We also hope that you will issue an apology, not only to Representative Ellison, but to the Muslim citizens of your district.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Rev. Welton Gaddy
President, Interfaith AllianceRabbi Jack Moline
Director of Public Policy, The Rabbinical AssemblyRabbi David Saperstein
Director and Counsel, Religious Action Center of Reform JudaismThe Rev. J. Brent Walker
Executive Director, Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty
19 Comments
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 9:40 am
I’m impressed! That’s a good letter. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Now will West “man-up” and apologize? Probably not. If anything he’ll make some lame statement about being misunderstood or something stupid like that.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 11:07 am
Religious leaders with a conscience and morals? Who would of think it?
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 11:26 am
Sorry, the Religious Left has no credibility with people on the right, which includes Col. West.
When is the press going to start investigating Ellison’s connections to the Muslim Brotherhood? Enquiring minds want to know.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 11:33 am
Excellent letter. It is important when people of faith stand up to ignorance and fear. Rep. West is nothing more than a fear monger.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 11:42 am
Rep. Keith Ellison is a convert to Islam from Catholicism. That makes Rep. Ellison awat=re of what is on both sides of the fence when it comes to Religion, Tenets, and following those tenets.
Rep. West is a fool of the highest caliber. Shame on him.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 12:38 pm
Torturing detainees, something scumbag West did, is antithetical to the principles upon which this country was established.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 1:32 pm
Shooting a pistol over someone’s shoulder is only torture to those who think putting underpants on a prisoner’s head is torture. Colonel Jessup said it best.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 1:40 pm
Dennis please try to understand… movies are not real. They may seem like they are real life when you don’t take your medications, but rest assured… Movies are fiction and not real life. The fact that the movie referenced was directed by notorious Liberal Rob Reiner is just frosting on Dennis fevered brow.
(That boy worries me with his failure to see the difference between fantasy “Colonel Jessup” and ass hats like this fool from Florida.)
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 2:29 pm
You’re right, Amuseinc. Colonel Jessup is a fictional character.
So I guess I should say that even the liberal Rob Reiner had it right?
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 2:33 pm
Dennis
What is the difference between what you believe jihad to be and the crusades? Also, you stated that they were coming to get me in a different post….Who would “they” be?
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 3:06 pm
“Shooting a pistol over someone’s shoulder is only torture to those who think putting underpants on a prisoner’s head is torture. Colonel Jessup said it best.”
So what do you call standing in a room while your subordinates beat on someone for an hour.
By the way, it wasn’t just “shooting a pistol over someone’s shoulder” it was a mock execution which is indeed torture.
West is an abuser of detainees and a scumbag.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 3:38 pm
It’s time to put Dennis in the same padded cell with Tim. We’ll just stop engaging him after one of his Loony Tune comments.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 4:17 pm
@John – “What is the difference between what you believe jihad to be and the crusades? Also, you stated that they were coming to get me in a different post….Who would “they” be?”
Well at first blush I’d say the crusades ended over 700 years ago and we weren’t around then to be its victims. Also the Christian armies rode horses, wore uniforms and pretty much engaged the Islamic armies on the battlefield.
Jihadists have no such military ethics. They hide amongst us. They kill innocent civilians in acts of terrorism, they number in the millions, and they live as close as Burnsville and downtown Minneapolis.
“Because non-Muslims in the West, as well as in India, China, Russia, and the world over, are facing a concerted effort by Islamic jihadists, the motives and goals of whom are largely ignored by the Western media, to destroy their societies and bring them forcibly into the Islamic world — and to commit violence to that end even while their overall goal remains out of reach. That effort goes under the general rubric of jihad.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/why-jihad-watch.html
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 4:23 pm
When a sect of religion is disagreeing with the most extreme right, its called the “left” by those of extreme. when the very same sect of religion agree’s with them, then they say “main stream”
its all about staying on the extreme, and to be a troll amongst the non extreme.
It takes a brave mind to be open minded. It takes a brave soul to say they do not have all the answers. Its a cowards way to always be right, and on the right.
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
Not man enough, won’t apologize.
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/03/west-no-apology/
Comment posted February 3, 2011 @ 8:01 pm
West: “..you’ve got to be able to defeat them intellectually in debate and discourse, and you to just have to be able to challenge each and every one of their assertions very wisely and very forthright.”
That sounds like exactly what Ellison did with his comment. Voting for him is trully a pleasure.
I didn’t read the comments, did Dennis say something foolish?
Comment posted February 4, 2011 @ 11:27 am
Actually, the sun doesn’t rise. That’s an optical illusion.
Comment posted March 15, 2011 @ 3:29 pm
Dennis, you’re good on here. You are debating some well spoken adversaries. If find the dialog healthy. Fight on.
BTW, I thought that if Ellison is so sorry that he cries because we are questioning folks about radicalization, and people don’t want to hear it – turn it off. Everyone is so concerned about PC that common sense is leaving the room. I am all for color blind and religious acceptance. Great. When terrorists are sending money home and recruiting in Mpls, I want some cooperation – and I don’t care how we get it. PC can kiss my a$$.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







