Gov. Tim Pawlenty. Photo: IowaPolitics.com, Flickr
Gov. Tim Pawlenty. Photo: IowaPolitics.com, Flickr

Pawlenty in the middle: Nate Silver graphs the 2012 contenders

By Andy Birkey
Friday, February 04, 2011 at 11:42 am

Nate Silver of the New York Times’ FiveThirtyEight graphed the potential 2012 presidential contenders based on their insider/outsider status and their position on a moderate-to-conservative scale. Not surprisingly, Rep. Michele Bachmann took the conservative extreme. Tim Pawlenty, on the other hand, was rated smack in the middle of the graph. Silver notes that he had trouble ranking the enigma that is Minnesota’s former governor.

Bachmann was the most conservative except for former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, but she did have the strongest outsider-conservative rating due in part to her ability to promote herself and the Tea Party without toeing the official GOP line.

Silver said Pawlenty was difficult to chart.

“I had trouble placing him in any of the four quadrants,” Silver wrote. “As Jay Cost of The Weekly Standard points out, — Mr. Pawlenty enjoys something of a reputation as a moderate even though his positions are fairly conservative: he has pledged to reinstate the military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy, for instance. Likewise, Mr. Pawlenty seems to keep Washington at arm’s length while having supporters within the Republican establishment.”

It’s Pawlenty’s middle ground that appears to have kept his campaign from taking off.

“I have been skeptical about Mr. Pawlenty’s candidacy,” Silver noted, “in large part because his personality is not terribly dynamic and he has had some trouble creating a strong brand for himself; sales of his book ‘Courage to Stand’, for instance, have been quite weak. Still, he can be credited with a viable strategy: stay a safe distance off the lead lap, and hope for a multicar pileup ahead of him.”

Silver points to evidence that that may be exactly what Pawlenty is doing.

“That Mr. Pawlenty has been among the first Republicans to build out his campaign infrastructure fits with that strategy — it would be valuable in the car-crash scenario, which implies a long, drawn-out nomination process,” Silver added. “So does the fact that Mr. Pawlenty could plausibly position himself as conservative or moderate, insider or outsider, as the situation dictates.”

Here is Silver’s graph:

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

8 Comments

Kevin
Comment posted February 4, 2011 @ 12:23 pm

I have a feeling we’re going to see some major car crashes or even some all-out train wrecks as this nomination process goes forward. I’m excited! This should be fun!


Dennis
Comment posted February 4, 2011 @ 10:27 pm

This chart is not only meaningless, it’s inaccurate. Ron Paul is no “moderate.” He’s a bleeping libertarian fer chissakes. And why would Newt be considerd an insider? He doesn’t hold any office or even work in Washington. He’s as much an outsider as Huckabee is. And Huntsman? His circle should be smaller than Herman Cain’s.

I don’t know who Nate Silver built this for but he missed the mark. Republican voters don’t care so much whether a candidate is an insider or an outsider as long he has strong conservative bonefides.

The republican party consists of three wings – the fiscal conservatives (or free marketeers), the social conservatives (or cultural warriors), and the libertarians (or constitutional conservatives). Some republicans are one, some are two out of three, and some are combinations of all three.

A more valuable rating system would be colored circles of varying sizes that described the candidates in those terms.

It might be interesting to see an attempt to attribute similar liberal traits to democrat candidates but there doesn’t seem to be any principled nuance on the other side.


ChapterandVerse
Comment posted February 4, 2011 @ 10:40 pm

Nate Silver is completely data driven. I trust his results. You, on the other hand, are completely irrational. I’ll go with Nate.


Dennis
Comment posted February 5, 2011 @ 7:49 am

Silver’s a partisan hack.


Tom Servo
Comment posted February 5, 2011 @ 2:31 pm

If you go to the CPAC and you want her to see you when she gives her speech, make sure you’re seating a few feet off to the left (her right) of the podium.


ChapterandVerse
Comment posted February 6, 2011 @ 9:16 am

Tsk, tsk,tsk. Dennis, take your meds.


Zera Lee
Comment posted February 9, 2011 @ 5:21 am

What a “Lawrence Welk” moment.


Jay Fox
Comment posted April 26, 2011 @ 10:49 pm

I found Silver’s charting very unhelpful and misleading.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.