McCollum ‘undeterred’ after death threat, failure of amendment to bar taxpayer funds to NASCAR
Friday, February 18, 2011 at 1:59 pm
Seeking to stop the Pentagon from using taxpayer funds to sponsor NASCAR — and earning a death threat along the way — Rep. Betty McCollum sponsored an amendment to ban such funding. By a House vote of 148 to 281, that measure failed on Friday afternoon.
The St. Paul Democrat called the expenditure of $7 million by the Department of Defense on NASCAR an “absurdity,” especially in times of government budget deficits and belt tightening.
“This was a vote about priorities and making smart choices,” said McCollum Chief of Staff Bill Harper in a statement. “With trillion dollar federal deficits this vote to protect taxpayer funded race cars shows that even a Tea Party Republican-led Congress is not serious about cutting wasteful spending. The American people need to know that a majority in Congress is willing to cut homeless veterans, community health centers, and family planning services, but spend millions of tax dollars for race cars.”
McCollum’s sponsorship of the amendment, which was part of H.R. 1, the appropriations bill to fund the federal government through September, resulted in a threatening fax that’s being investigated by Capitol police. The racist message showed the head of Barack Obama within a noose being pulled behind a pickup truck — a clear reference to the 1998 dragging death and beheading of James Byrd, Jr., an African-African man in Jasper, Texas. It called for “Death to all Marxists,” called McCollum a “slut” and told her to shut her “phucking [sic] pie hole.”
California State Sen. Leland Yee received a nearly identical fax in late January.
In a release, McCollum’s office says she’s “undeterred”:
[S]he intends to introduce legislation to prohibit taxpayer funds from being used for sponsorship of race cars, dragsters, Indy cars, and motorcycle racing, as well as repeal the $45 million special tax earmark for NASCAR and race track owners included in the 2010 law that extended the Bush tax cuts and added $858 billion to the federal budget deficit.
McCollum was unable to vote on the amendment because she’s traveling to the Middle East to speak at a security conference.
15 Comments
Comment posted February 18, 2011 @ 3:31 pm
Can you imagine, FOR ONE GOD DAMN SECOND, the conflagration of outrage if it were discovered that a school or some teachers paid $100m of taxpayer money for advertising? There would be exploding bagger heads flying this way and that.
Comment posted February 18, 2011 @ 9:11 pm
Why would NASCAR, which has enough corporate sponsors to sustain itself and to make many rich, need tax-payer money?
Comment posted February 18, 2011 @ 9:29 pm
They don’t need taxpayer money, but the Army, being a part of the government, has to pay for their advertising just like anyone else. Why didn’t she just offer a bill to eliminate all pentagon recruitment advertising?
It’s not needed. Young republican kids enlist because they’re patiots. Young democrat kids don’t enlist unless they’re gay.
Comment posted February 18, 2011 @ 10:25 pm
So, Dennis, if you are in the military today, you must be a Republican or gay? Or maybe both?
Comment posted February 19, 2011 @ 9:35 am
Since when do “Young republican kids enlist”? Most of them have their eyes set on Wall Street or other money-making arena. LIke Dick Cheney said, when asked why he avoided going to Vietnam when it was his turn, “I had other priorities”.
And how many of the potential 2012 GOP presidential candidates have ever served?
Comment posted February 19, 2011 @ 12:33 pm
Hey Clay – do you really think the army rangers or the marines or the navy seals are bastians of liberalism? I didn’t think so.
Over 70% of the military votes republican. About 90% of people in combat roles do. Which is why Mark Ritchie and his ilk are always trying to invalidate absentee votes from military bases.
Comment posted February 19, 2011 @ 2:32 pm
Republican values 101:
NO to Sesame Street, Mr. Rogers, and Arthur
YES to stupid rednecks that can’t even make right turn.
Comment posted February 19, 2011 @ 7:58 pm
What’s cheaper the Army advertising(Republican values) or reinstating the draft (extreme right-wing values)? While NASCAR probably isn’t the best way the military could spend their advertising dollars in terms of value, it does reach their target audience of ‘rednecks’ who DO mostly vote Republican.
Alternately, we could follow the example of our European friends and require military service in exchange for post-secondary education (liberal democrat values). My only concern is if NASCAR is getting anything but advertising fees but if $7 mil a year is all their getting, it doesn’t sound like it.
Comment posted February 20, 2011 @ 9:45 am
Dennis, please cite sources to prove that “Mark Ritchie and his ilk are always trying to invalidate absentee votes from military bases.”
Been watching “Starship Troopers” over and over, eh?
Comment posted February 21, 2011 @ 7:38 am
Katie, why don’t you just cover your eyes and sing “la-la-la-la!”
That way you won’t to deal with my inconvenient truths.
Comment posted February 21, 2011 @ 10:10 am
It’s true just took a barracks poll here in Afghanistan,47 republican votes, 13 democrat, and 12 won’t ever votes.
Comment posted February 22, 2011 @ 6:12 pm
Dennis,
I know that military personnel are convinced to vote Republican. Like many Americans, they vote against their interests even though military pay stagnates under Republican presidents (unless you count the hazard pay that they rack up by being sent needlessly into elective wars for years at a time) and they get saddled with shoddy equipment, barracks showers that electrocute them, and other consequences of the no-bid contract.
The conservative movement got very good at getting people to vote against their interests. It’s why the United States is now a third-world country.
Comment posted February 23, 2011 @ 4:04 pm
With Armed Forces Radio broadcasting Rush Limbaugh so prolifically, while providing only token access for opposing views, cannot help but have a decisive propaganda effect on military personnel. The success of democracy depends on an educated and well-informed electorate. Active-duty personnel who depend on AFR are not well-informed.
Funneling money to NASCAR in the name of advertising is a method of political payback. As we wind down Iraq and Afghanistan, military recruitment can be throttled back to normal levels as well.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







