Obama orders DOJ to stop defending Defense of Marriage Act in court
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 11:47 am
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announces in a U.S. Department of Justice press release that President Obama has ordered the department to cease future defense of the Defense of Marriage Act’s constitutionality in federal court. DOMA bans the recognition of same-sex marriage.
In the two years since this Administration took office, the Department of Justice has defended Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act on several occasions in federal court. Each of those cases evaluating Section 3 was considered in jurisdictions in which binding circuit court precedents hold that laws singling out people based on sexual orientation, as DOMA does, are constitutional if there is a rational basis for their enactment. While the President opposes DOMA and believes it should be repealed, the Department has defended it in court because we were able to advance reasonable arguments under that rational basis standard.
Section 3 of DOMA has now been challenged in the Second Circuit, however, which has no established or binding standard for how laws concerning sexual orientation should be treated. In these cases, the Administration faces for the first time the question of whether laws regarding sexual orientation are subject to the more permissive standard of review or whether a more rigorous standard, under which laws targeting minority groups with a history of discrimination are viewed with suspicion by the courts, should apply.
After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation, the President has concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny. The President has also concluded that Section 3 of DOMA, as applied to legally married same-sex couples, fails to meet that standard and is therefore unconstitutional. Given that conclusion, the President has instructed the Department not to defend the statute in such cases. I fully concur with the President’s determination.
Consequently, the Department will not defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA as applied to same-sex married couples in the two cases filed in the Second Circuit. We will, however, remain parties to the cases and continue to represent the interests of the United States throughout the litigation. I have informed Members of Congress of this decision, so Members who wish to defend the statute may pursue that option. The Department will also work closely with the courts to ensure that Congress has a full and fair opportunity to participate in pending litigation.
Read the entire press release.
And here’s Holder’s letter about the decision sent to House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).
4 Comments
Comment posted February 23, 2011 @ 12:50 pm
What? Please simplify. My head is having problems today.
Comment posted February 23, 2011 @ 12:59 pm
It seems as if someone just lost their free government legal assistance.
Comment posted February 23, 2011 @ 1:59 pm
In policy terms Obama is right, but isn’t the executive branch obligated to defend laws in court, even if the president would rather lose? It seems like Holder is saying he has to defend challenged laws where there’s a precedent supporting the defense, but not where there isn’t a precedent. I guess I’m thinking this through too. It’s not like I know this as well as Holder and Obama. They’re their own experts on this.
Comment posted February 25, 2011 @ 12:57 pm
DOMA has been ruled unconstitutional in part, and President Obama and his legal advisers have determined that it is constitutional in the whole.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Can defending a law they believe to be unconstitutional be reconciled with the mandate to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution? I think not.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







