Bachmann 500x171

Republicans’ anti-abortion ‘army of IRS agents’

By John Tomasic
Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 10:23 am

Last year Rep. Michele Bachmann led the Republican charge against health care reform legislation, arguing that it would be the worst kind of big government intrusion. She warned it would insert government between Americans and their doctors and that the Obama Administration would let loose an army of IRS agents to knock on doors and force citizens to pay up for insurance. Yet, as Mother Jones reported last week, Bachmann and other anti-abortion congressional Republicans this year have proposed a series of bills that would put government between women and their doctors and set loose the IRS to investigate how women who had abortions became pregnant and how they paid for their abortions.

The “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act,” sponsored by Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J. ), also known as HR 3, extends the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funding for abortion in most cases. It has been given top-priority by GOP House leaders and now has more than 220 co-sponsors. Last Wednesday, Thomas Barthold, chief of staff of the nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee, told a House tax committee that the bill would put the onus on the IRS to track how women are spending their health care tax benefits in order to discover if they used any of that money to pay for an abortion.

As Mother Jones put it, women would have to be sure to keep their reproductive health care receipts — and all other documentation related to their pregnancies.

If a women paid for an abortion out of a health care tax benefit savings account, she’d better be able to produce documentary evidence that the pregnancy came about as a result of rape or incest or that bringing the pregnancy to term would have endangered her life — the thee exceptions to the Hyde Amendment.

Monica McCafferty, director of marketing and communications at Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, told the Colorado Independent the bill would bring to life the horrors the right projected onto last year’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. There’s nothing “small government” about HR 3, she said. It puts no value on personal responsibility and liberty, opens the door for real government intrusion and increases taxes to boot.

“Under the guise of prohibiting federal funding of abortion, which is already banned, the true intent of Rep. Smith’s bill is to end insurance coverage for virtually all abortions even in cases involving the most severe dangers to a woman’s health,” McCafferty wrote in an email. “Since Rep. Smith and other cosponsors can’t outlaw abortion legislatively, they are instead unfairly creating intrusive policies that hurt women and families. Abortion is legal medical care and the vast majority of health insurance plans already cover it. Politicians shouldn’t try to stop insurance companies from covering a legal medical procedure.

“Ultimately this will result in new tax penalties that will affect thousands of Coloradans and tax payers across the country, especially those who are self-employed or small business owners. This is an unprecedented intrusion in the private health insurance market.”

Here’s Bachmann last year decrying “Obamacare” on the floor of the House. Tea Party enthusiasts YouTubed her comments and added the ominous sound of IRS agents knocking on doors.

Comments

6 Comments

Carl
Comment posted March 23, 2011 @ 10:40 am

Will the sex nazis document parentage of children conceived in C-Street and other Family compounds? Wow. Turns out Margret Atwood was right.

Praise Jebus, God has no shame, Amen.


Xtine
Comment posted March 23, 2011 @ 11:15 am

Hey – I’m helping with the peddling of a new response to the abortion debate. Pass it on…
I suggest that a new law be passed that all male Americans enter their DNA into a DNA data-bank. I further suggest that DNA samples be taken upon birth of all male children. This will ensure that there is never such a thing as an unwanted or unclaimed pregnancy. A man will be held legally responsible for each time they ejaculate throughout the course of their lifetime.

I suggest that we support this legislation more rigorously than current anti-choice laws for women because the female anti-choice laws are far more complex and advanced than the male anti-choice laws. No man should be able to have sex until this law is implemented. I look forward to all those non-hypocritical and hypocritical men lining up to enter their DNA into this anti-choice database… and bringing their sons with them. They can turn this into a family outing! Think of all the jobs this will create?!

Once this even-playing field Male DNA database is set into place, I and other women will be much more willing to give up rights to our own DNA choices.


Paul V
Comment posted March 23, 2011 @ 11:30 am

So much for smaller government and jobs.

We have to step into the private lives of women and families during one of their most trying moments in life. What a crock

I am truly ashamed that a legislater thinks for one moment that a law be put in place to endanger womens lives. I see that Bachmann is starting her own death panel.

From this point on when ever I hear the term “Death panel” I will think of Bachmann.


pudgmo
Comment posted March 23, 2011 @ 12:12 pm

Boycott CD6!


Sue
Comment posted March 23, 2011 @ 10:59 pm

Windbag. Enough said.


thomas butler
Comment posted March 24, 2011 @ 10:55 am

Maybe they are looking at this as a jobs creation strategy?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.