Photo: Larry Darling, Flickr

GOP education plan has educators seething

Proposal would cut per-student funding in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth by $415, $395 and $132
By James Sanna
Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 4:14 pm
On Thursday afternoon, the state Senate passed a highly contentious education budget bill that has many in the Minneapolis schools seething. They see the bill, and its sibling passed by the state House of Representatives on Monday, as an attempt to put their districts on a “starvation diet.” 

And, as poor Minnesotans move to the northern and southern suburbs in increasing numbers, some wonder if the Republican proposal is setting schools in many of their members’ districts up for failure.

“What do they know about kids living in poverty, about kids whose parents are refugees and immigrants? What do they know about those experiences and challenges? ” said Minneapolis School Board Chair Jill Davis, speaking about GOP legislators who approved the plan to defund Minneapolis, St. Paul and Duluth public schools by $415, $395 and $132 per student, respectively.

“Every child deserves every opportunity they can get, and to not have this be a driving value of this legislation makes me very angry,” Davis said.

Holding mostly true to their promise not to raise taxes, Republicans passed an education funding bill that shifts money from three kinds of dedicated school funding — integration funding, “compensatory” funding for districts that have high concentrations of poor students, and a fund to help districts manage rapidly growing special education costs — to increase the basic per-pupil aid given to schools by the state. The money Minneapolis will loose has previously been used to provide support services for poor students, students who are still learning English and special education students.

“It doesn’t mean they can’t learn,” said Sarah Snapp, budget director for the Minneapolis Public Schools. “It just means we have to do more as a school system and as a community to give them what they need so that they can do more.”

The problem, Snapp said, is that those supports are all very personnel-intensive.

The same rule holds true in Worthington, a rural town in the southwestern corner of the state that has become a magnet for Latino and Asian immigrants over the last 15 years, according to superintendent John Landgaard.

“Right now, we have three Hispanic interpreters,” Landgaard said. “We also added three ELL [English Language Learners] teachers just last year, we have different software programs, and we have put in place educational specialists to help address some of those challenges [faced by ELL students].”

All these positions cost money, and after years of state education budgets that have either cut funding or not kept pace with inflation, there’s not much of that green stuff to go around.

“If we loose integration funding, for example,” said Minneapolis’ Snapp, “we’ll have to eliminate [the magnet schools it funds], or find another way to fund them. But if we find another way to fund them, and that would mean taking money from general aid [the basic $5,124 that districts get from the state per student under the GOP proposal].”

If the cuts were to pass, most districts would be seeing modest increases of around $50 per student. This pales in comparison to the potential $415-per-student loss that Minneapolis schools’ Snapp said would devastate the district’s ability to pay for support services. As suburban school systems like Anoka-Hennepin, Hopkins, Elk River, Eden Prairie, North St Paul, Rosemount-Apple Valley and others see more and more “vulnerable students” move into their districts, they could be on the hook to provide a lot more services than they have the money to pay for.

An analysis of data from the Minnesota Department of Education shows that many of these districts, which cover many mostly Republican-controlled legislative districts around the Twin Cities metro, have seen their numbers of ELL students grow by between one and 10 percent between 2003 and 2009. However, most have seen their numbers of poor students jump by 40, 60 or even 341 percent (in the case of the Elk River school district), although increases of between 40 and 100 percent were more the norm. The Farmington school district, which is partly represented by House Education Finance Committee Chair Pat Garofalo, saw its numbers of poor students jump by 128 percent. Garofalo did not return calls requesting comment on this story.

As reported in the Star-Tribune on Thursday, and previously noted by the University of Minnesota’s Institute on Race and Poverty in 2010, these demographic trends are long-term, and not necessarily related to the impact of the economic downturn.

Jim Grathwol, the Minneapolis schools’ state lobbyist, says he thinks the potentially short-sighted budget bill is fueled by the large number of freshmen in GOP ranks, and the relative inexperience of GOP leaders in the House and Senate.

“They may not know how to do this three-way dance,” Grathwol said, speaking of budget negotiations.

“They see what they think are worse results costing more money [in the Minneapolis and St Paul schools], and they want that money back,” he added, referring to the achievement gap between poor students of color and white students.

“There’s an attempt to pin the achievement gap fail on the core cities donkey — it’s a twofer with political appeal, as the core cities are mostly DFL strongholds,” he said.

Comments

9 Comments

Bopper
Comment posted March 31, 2011 @ 6:24 pm

Carrying on with the ideas used in Chicago under Daley and Arne Duncan. Grading schools A-F based on test results, millions to charter schools (privatizing schools and closing neighborhood schools), and mass teacher firings were supposed to lead to a Chicago miracle. It did not. The Republicans’ Texas miracle, based on the same ideas, never happened either. Washington DC’s miracle ? Check your morning paper. New York, New Jersey- same thing is in the works. Keep raising the bar and public schools while district money flows to charters. Kids whose test scores hurt the charters’ ratings get sent back to public schools, which will of course “fail”. There’s money to be made by privatizing education. If they cared about improving education and the lives of kids, they would actually LOOK at the results and run like hell from these ideas.


Larry Darling
Comment posted March 31, 2011 @ 8:47 pm

Thank you for using my photo of buses for your article on schools.


ChapterandVerse
Comment posted March 31, 2011 @ 11:19 pm

The republican idealogs are dunces. This 2-year run will prove that. Come on 2012!


Paul Schmelzer
Comment posted April 1, 2011 @ 8:39 am

You’re welcome, Larry. Nice shot, and thanks for having it licensed through Creative Commons!


Lane
Comment posted April 1, 2011 @ 10:06 am

So that’s what they are – school buses. I thought they were monarch butterflies; it’s time for this old man to get new glasses. Just kidding, but it’s a nice picture really.

Speaking of certain school buses, don’t those with extended black antenna-like rear-view mirrors on the front remind you of wasps? Those buses make me nervous!?!


Mike
Comment posted April 1, 2011 @ 10:49 am

This is not intended to hijack the thread per se, but the image of buses does highlight an issue that many schools face skyrocketing transportation costs. It is amazing that the typical school bus get no better than 8 mpg (Source – American School Bus Council). Considering how much transporting schools do, and the insane cost of diesel fuel, we can and should do better. It’s not as sexy as having an IPad in every student’s hands, but if you can increase the fuel efficiency of a bus by 50%, imagine the savings schools can realise and use for purposes like staff, supplies, and even building maintenance.


EricF
Comment posted April 1, 2011 @ 12:12 pm

As a Minneapolis resident, what is angering even beyond the amount of money is these Republican legislators who nothing more about Minneapolis than how to spell it having no interest in finding out what they don’t know. Then again, how many brains should it take to figure out that when you have more poor children, more special ed, and more ELL, you’re going to have significantly higher costs?


DebK
Comment posted April 1, 2011 @ 6:48 pm

The entire House Education Committee visited a St. Paul high school a few weeks ago to see how St. Paul uses the integration funds and compensatory aid. Obviously it didn’t make any difference to the Republican law makers who have their own agenda that looks suspiciously like the “model legislation” proposed by the American Legislative Exchange Council.


lynn
Comment posted April 6, 2011 @ 5:59 pm

The American Legislative Exchange Council, there is an organization worth looking into.
This education bill is based on ideology and not research on actual outcomes. The
outcomes of this bill if enacted would be far reaching indeed.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.