Medicare ad 500.2

Ads target Cravaack, Bachmann over Medicare vote

By Andy Birkey
Wednesday, April 20, 2011 at 8:19 am

Minnesota U.S. Reps. Michele Bachmann and Chip Cravaack are the targets of radio ads by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee over their votes to “end Medicare.” The ad buy is extremely small and is part of the DCCC’s “Drive to 25″ campaign, an effort launched in January with the aim of gaining back the 25 seats the Democrats need to win the House in 2012.

“This is a defining moment for House Republicans: they chose to end Medicare rather than end taxpayer giveaways for Big Oil or tax breaks for the ultra rich,” DCCC Chairman Steve Israel said in a statement announcing the ads. “We will go district by district to hold Republicans accountable for the wrong choice they made.”

The 15-second radio ad says, “Did you know Congressman Michele Bachmann voted to end Medicare forcing seniors to pay $12,500 for private health insurance, without guaranteed coverage? Tell Bachmann to keep her hands off our Medicare.”

A similar ad buy has been purchased to target Cravaack. The ads are part of “news-weather-traffic” radio, the DCCC says, and the group is supplementing them with web ads, phone banking and action alert emails in those districts.

As Ben Smith at Politico notes, the ad buys are very small and for Cravaack’s district amount to $160.

The DCCC says that Republicans who voted for Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget voted to end Medicare. The Ryan budget creates a voucher system for seniors to go out on the private market to purchase insurance, an idea that virtually all experts have said will cost seniors more money. The plan would not affect seniors currently on Medicare.

The DCCC released this web ad along with the radio ads:

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

2 Comments

Lane
Comment posted April 20, 2011 @ 11:17 am

Rep. McCollum pointed out in a recent email that for practical purposes, “private insurance for the elderly is not currently an option for anyone except the extremely wealthy.”

Additionally, cutting off access to Medicare for those 54 years old or younger does not take into account those who through no fault of their own are or become disabled and thus unable to obtain or afford medical insurance.

Medicare is not the problem. The real problem is the skyrocketing costs within the health insurance and medical industries.


Kevin
Comment posted April 20, 2011 @ 1:51 pm

And if you have a preexisting condition (and what senior doesn’t?) how would this affect your ability to even get private insurance or at what cost if you can? I realize the dilemma of preexisting conditions is addressed in the Affordable Care Act, but aren’t Repubs looking to repeal every aspect of that program – including the ban on insurance companies denying coverage for preexisting conditions?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.