Photo: Kellie Parker, Flickr

Opponents say GOP gay marriage amendment distracts from economy

CEO: Bill 'would create a significant setback for Minnesota businesses'
By Andy Birkey
Wednesday, April 27, 2011 at 8:23 am

Business leaders, Democrats and LGBT groups are unified in one aspect of their opposition to a Republican Senate bill that would but a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage on the ballot in 2012: Gay marriage is a distraction from Minnesota’s economic needs.

House Minority Leader Paul Thissen, in a statement released in response to the bill introduced Tuesday, blasted the GOP for not spending more time fixing Minnesota’s budget.

“With only four weeks to go to balance the budget, this is not the time to launch an effort to amend the state constitution to further divide Minnesotans from one another,” he said. “Instead of focusing on gay marriage, Senator [Warren] Limmer should get to work on the Public Safety budget that he’s responsible for. Engaging in delays and distractions is unacceptable.”

“The clock is ticking,” he added. “Minnesotans are waiting for an honest, responsible GOP budget.”

Charlie Zelle, CEO of Jefferson Bus Lines and chair of the Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, criticized the push for the amendment.

“In so many ways, this constitutional amendment is bad for Minnesota employers and a distraction from the real priority for the state: growing the economy,” he said in a statement. “Instead, we need to move Minnesota forward by pursuing policies that are good for business, good for all Minnesota families and will make our state stronger and more competitive.”

He added, “Minnesota’s CEOs and small business owners alike need state lawmakers to stay focused on placing Minnesota’s economy and business environment back on track. A constitutional amendment against full inclusion is not only a distraction but would create a significant setback for Minnesota businesses.”

Ann Kaner-Roth, executive director of Project 515, said that research demonstrates that communities inclusive of gay and lesbian couples often perform better economically.

“The proposed amendment is anti-jobs, anti-business and anti-family,” she said, “A wealth of research finds that inclusion strengthens the economy and Minnesota employers know it. That’s why they are leading the way by implementing inclusive policies in the workplace. We hope state leaders will remember that equality is an advantage.”

Monica Meyer, executive director of OutFront Minnesota, agreed with that assessment.

“Even though the Legislature has critical budgetary issues that need to be addressed, they are taking valuable time to introduce a constitutional amendment that would discriminate against Minnesotans,” she said. “This is completely counter to the direction public opinion is moving. Plus, this constitutional amendment is redundant. Minnesota already has a law in place defining marriage. This proposal takes our state in the wrong direction and tarnishes our constitution with discrimination that Minnesotans don’t support.”

Project 515 and OutFront Minnesota offered evidence to back up their claims.

“Employers with engaged workers have 2.6 times more earnings per share growth and twice the annual net income compared to other companies and inclusive policies are among the strongest indicators of engagement,” according to research by Gallup and the Kenexa Research Institute. The groups also cited studies showing that cities that are more inclusive attract more talented workers, especially in the technology fields.

According to MinnPost, before the announcement, Gov. Mark Dayton said: “I strongly oppose a constitutional amendment that would prohibit same-sex marriage. It [a prohibition] already exists in state law.”

DFL chair Ken Martin sent a passionate appeal to party member in an email Tuesday evening.

It’s official. Today, Republicans in the legislature officially introduced their constitutional amendment to outlaw gay marriage and write discrimination into our state constitution.

Our fight starts now.

Throughout history, our party has always stood up for equality and fairness. And now we need to mount a strong offense to ensure that the Republicans are not able to turn back the clock on equal rights.

But this fight is not just about fairness and equality.

It’s about our belief that every person in Minnesota should have the ability to marry the person they love. It’s about our belief that government should not sanction discrimination. It’s about creating a culture of respect in society so that every child will be safe at school and have a healthy, respectful learning environment free of harassment and violence.

Meanwhile, the Minnesota Family Council, a conservative religious organization that opposes LGBT rights, asked its members to contact their legislators in support of the amendment.

“After seven years, a bill to allow the people of Minnesota to vote on marriage has been introduced in the state Senate. This is fantastic news, but we need you to email your State Senator and tell him or her to pass the marriage amendment bill and put it on the ballot for the people to vote,” the group said. “Remind them that the right to vote is our most important civil right and that this is an issue for the people to decide themselves.”

MFC added, “Legislators are not being asked to decide if marriage is the union of a man and a woman. They are being asked to let the people decide this issue. Demand that House leadership introduce and pass the marriage amendment today.”

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

14 Comments

Dave Porter
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 8:36 am

“Focused like a laser on jobs, jobs, jobs.”
Yup, that’s what they promised while campaigning for office.
And enough Minnesotans believed them long enough to vote for them.

We have short-changed our schools for at least forty years.
We are reaping what we sowed. This is the result of social promotion in our schools.
“Social promotion” means giving high school diplomas and admission to our state colleges regardless of whether they’ve earned it. Including those who are deliberately dumb.

So now we have all these deliberately dumb people running our government.
They see no difference between faith and reality. They see no benefit in logical
thinking. They’ve never had to bear the results of their own stupidity.

And now we get to pay the costs. And they hopscotch away, just like W.


Randy
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 9:17 am

I don’t doubt that economic issues (i.e. cementing the dominance of the wealthy) were foremost for most Republican legislators. What has happened is that they have found that this does not play so well with the base. In the cold, hard light of day, voters are recognizing the scam. An anti-gay marriage amendment is a ploy to distract the social conservative base from the failure of their representatives to do anything about the economy.

Sadly, it may work.


Alex
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 10:24 am

I wonder if the GOP are aware that this could backfire on them. What if the citizens of Minnesota vote to allow same sex marriage? Are they then going to say “Oops…we were just kidding”?

No one who voted last election can say that they didn’t know that the GOP had their own agenda.


Mike P.
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 10:24 am

If states with gay marriage do so much better economically, then states such as Massachusetts and Vermont would have seen economic growth, which they have not (indeed, MA is losing a congressional seat). States with massive growth include Georgia, Florida, and Texas- none of which has same-sex marriage and all of which have marriage provisions in their state constitutions. Anybody who thinks that gay marriage will help a state’s economy is fooling themselves. Cutting taxes would help our economy, but Gov. Dayton would never have that!


Kevin
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 10:37 am

I realize this story just broke yesterday, but so far I am underwhelmed by the Democratic response. In fact, I’m angry.

You can be assured in upcoming months we’re going to see TV ads up the butt telling people this is all about protecting marriage and families and the Christian values of Western civilization. Unless this amendment passes American life as we know it will come to an end. We will sink into the black hole of destruction. Conservs will not hold back with their lies.

And people will buy it unless Democrats are willing to do just as much screaming about the real intention of this amendment – bigotry and hate. Unfortunately about the only thing Democrats seem to be able to muster is the intellectual approach – you know – logic and reason. Yawn. And guess what, they get their butts whipped every time. Sorry guys, unless you’re willing to put some passion in your response and get just as mean and ugly as Republicans do, this thing will pass with no problem.


Eric
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 11:01 am

Randy,

Agreed.

The Republicans are faced with a big dilemma. They generally don’t believe in government solutions to problems, instead maintaining that business, the market and private sector will adequately address all significant social problems. If held to consistently, this view of the world is a reflection of magical thinking. In any case…

But then they find themselves in office and able to use the power of government to actually improve the world. Do they become hypocrites and use that power, or do they basically do nothing? (Which is another way of saying: deregulate, lower taxes, and cut budgets.)

Well, as you point out, they still have to do something to satisfy their ignorant and easy-to-command base. So, they go back to their crude religious fixations on sex and reproduction, believing that controlling the interaction of other people’s genitals is a major key to building a better society. Indeed, their worldview consists of a kind of folk sociology comprised of half-understood (if at all) ideas, numerous urban legends (e.g. that gays “recruit”) and bits of misinformation, all set atop a foundation of credulous and anti-scientific religious delusions.

These are the cretins in charge of state government now. They’re so far removed from a minimal conception of the kind of intelligence needed to advance the interests of this state, it’s mind blowing.


Mike
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 11:29 am

As a former Minnesotan who now lives in CA,I can tell you first hand how ugly this will be. My middle class neighborhood is still divided by Prop 8 after almost 3 yrs.People know who supported Prop 8 and there are still bitter feelings and a palpable sense of anger. I hope MN is able to avoid such a divisive fight. Marriage equality will carry the day despite the anti gay Prop 8′ers and their ilk.


Joe
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 1:05 pm

@Mike: I’m in exactly the same boat as you. It pits neighbor versus neighbor. It was UGLY. HATEFUL. It basically turns your state into a civil war.

The Minnesota Supreme Court has ALREADY reviewed its gay marriage laws and ALREADY declared them to be constitutional, a motion that was redeclared in 2010. This amendment is an unnecessary, big government, job killing distraction that does nothing but turn neighbors against each other and write discrimination into the constitution. It is unbridled hate. Period. The only reason they’re doing it is because some group in Washington DC told them to. That’s not the Minnesota way. Kill this discrimination now!!


Carl
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 1:41 pm

This amendment smells of Doug Coe’s fundamentalist colonialization strategies. I suspect the MNGOP gets guidance from C Street who mistakes Minnesota for Uganda. Resist the American Taliban!

Praise Jebus, God hates loving, committed couples, Amen.


SeanH
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 3:45 pm

“If it doesn’t have anything to do with business and jobs, it shouldn’t be our first priority.”

Speaker Kurt Zellers, November 2010


Scott
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 4:58 pm

And remember the Republicans don’t seem to care for anyone is not 1) White, 2) Rich 3) Male 4) Straight and 5) a certain type of Christian. The rest of us don’t really matter.


EricF
Comment posted April 27, 2011 @ 5:04 pm

I won’t dispute that this is a distraction from economic issues, but there’s a bigger principle at stake. Minority rights aren’t supposed to be subject to majority whim. Gays shouldn’t have rights only if straights feel like it, any more than non-whites should have rights if whites feel like it, or non-Christians get rights only if Christians feel like it.


Billy Wingarden
Comment posted April 28, 2011 @ 12:35 am

Teh republicans, who under Bush destroyed our economy by letting wall street and the banks run the greatest ponzi scheme of all time.

Not satisfied with that, they want to destroy gay marriage and equality.

Their motto _ If you tell lies often enough and outrageous enough, they will be seen as the truth.

BTW the guy who said that eg MA is losing population. Sure – not gay population, but people who hate the winters up there. Our family is refugees in MD And very active with the gay community in supporting their equality under our law, and fighting the catholic church of the endless hidden molsetation (think prison rape) and its Godfather of molestation RATZInger

And the right wing “anything but” christians who made this state a slave state, kept in the union by force of arms to protect DC.

We are where the action is.

Palwenty even vetod a law that would have let gay partners who had been together , often for decades, claim the body and make funeral arrangments for the first one who died.

thats the right wing agenda – Bring the troops home to fight our own talibangelicals, to hell with fighting in afghanista

http://www.catholicarrogance.org by a priest with 24 years of catholic education, who understands that the church of the inquisition simply has a new victim


Your Morning Coffee — Secrets of the City — Minneapolis + St. Paul
Pingback posted April 28, 2011 @ 8:15 am

[...] MNIndy: Opponents of gay marriage ban say bill distracts from economic issues [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.