WaPo: Lacking influence, Bachmann may need to hone new skills to get bridge funds
Monday, May 02, 2011 at 1:16 pm
Despite skillfully using the media in “boosting her personal brand,” Rep. Michele Bachmann has little influence on Capitol Hill, the Washington Post wrote in a profile Sunday. Of the 45 or so measures she’s introduced in her federal career, many are “small in scope and of great interest to conservative ideologues” — and few have gone anywhere. But one project — securing funding to replace the lift bridge over the St. Croix River in her hometown –”will test whether one of the most recognizable elected officials in Washington can fulfill the most basic duty of members of Congress: delivering for the voters in their district.”
Philip Rucker and Paul Kane write that, of Bachmann’s legislative efforts, “all have met with little to no success, except for a handful of symbolic resolutions, such as one commemorating Minnesota’s 150th anniversary of statehood and the one supporting the cause of hydrocephalus awareness.”
The profile notes Bachmann’s fundraising prowess and her savviness with the media, but in looking at the practical side of constituent services, the pair writes that the 6th Congressional District Republican is “unwilling to adopt many of the skills traditionally associated with success in Congress — inside maneuvering, charming committee leaders and trading favors with colleagues.”
Bachmann may need to employ those skills to clear the way for a new Stillwater bridge, which has been a contentious project for decades. The National Parks Service has gone back and forth on approving the plan, most recently rejecting it out of concerns for the “scenic” impacts on the protected waterway, while St. Paul Democratic Rep. Betty McCollum opposes it out of concern for cost during tough economic times. Bachmann has blamed “radical environment groups” for the lack of success on the project.
This time, she expects more success. She’ll testify at a Wednesday Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands hearing about her bridge bill. When she introduced the measure last year, it drew no cosponsors and fizzled in subcommittee. This time around, however, the bridge project is backed by a handful of Republicans as well as Gov. Mark Dayton and Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
6 Comments
Comment posted May 2, 2011 @ 1:47 pm
We all need to contact Dayton and Amy and tell them withdraw their support for the bridge. After all, who wants to destroy Bachmann’s perfect record of getting NOTHING done in her district. I’m sure no one else has come close to such a brilliant record of incompetence. The good people of the 6th District who elected her deserve this.
Comment posted May 2, 2011 @ 2:28 pm
So the sixth district is not responsible for sharing health care costs with the rest of the nation but the rest of the nation must build them a bridge. That’s not very tea-partyish of you Michele.
Praise Jebus, God hates the general welfare, Amen.
Comment posted May 3, 2011 @ 2:05 am
I thought Mcihele Bachmann was AGAINST Federal Monies for projects??? I mean she thumbed her nose when the St, Cloud DeSoto Bridge needed monies to be replaced. Then shows up at the Ribbon Curtting as if she had everything to do with getting money for the Bridge.
The thing with Bachmann is, she hates to miss an opportunity to get her face on TV or her name in the papers as she pretends to actually do anyhting. Makes me wonder when the people in the 6th CD are going to come to their senses and vote her ass out of office for the NOTHING she seems to be good at doing.
Comment posted May 3, 2011 @ 1:18 pm
Maybe they can divert some of the billions spent by the Feds on Federal Farm Subsidies to building the bridge…
Comment posted May 3, 2011 @ 8:37 pm
Oh back off you small minded twits. The old bridge is falling apart, how hard is that to understand?. Because of the St Croix River status a National Scenic River, It takes an act of congress to get a new bridge. Rep. Bachman, Gov. Dayton, Sen. Klobuchar, and Rep. Ron Kind are all behind getting a new bridge, rightly so, before there is a major disaster.
Comment posted May 4, 2011 @ 3:22 pm
We don’t need a Bluff to Bluff 700 million dollar 65mph super freeway bridge to New Richmond.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







