In close vote, anti-gay marriage amendment moves to House floor
Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 10:00 am
On Wednesday morning, the House Committee on Rules and Administration approved an amendment that would codify a ban on gay marriage within the Minnesota Constitution by a vote of 13 to 12. One Republican, Rep. Tim Kelly of Red Wing, joined the DFL in voting against the measure. The bill heads to a House floor vote. The committee took no public testimony before the vote.
DFLers pleaded with Republicans on the committee.
“The founding fathers warned against tyranny of majority,” said Rep. Kathy Brynaert, DFL-Mankato. “Don’t do this.”
Rep. Kate Knuth, DFL-New Brighton, said. “Why take away rights in our constitution? Why tear the people of our state apart?”
She added, “It makes me physically ill to think of the division we’ll see.”
Rep. Carolyn Laine, DFL-Columbia Heights, said, “Clearly this isn’t about the sanctity of marriage; it’s about discrimination.”
As the roll call was being taken, several protesters shouted “Shame!” and “You are damaging my life and my family!” One was dragged from the committee room.
According to OutFront Minnesota, five Republicans would need to vote with the DFL to defeat the amendment in the House. Along with Rep. Tim Kelly who voted against the amendment in the committee, Rep. John Kriesel, R-Cottage Grove, has said he will vote against it on the House floor.
The House will need to take the bill up before Monday, which is the last day of the session. The Senate has already passed the amendment, and if the House approves the measure, it will be on the ballot in 2012.
17 Comments
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 10:36 am
perhaps they could bring in Newt Gingrich….he’s an authority on traditional, biblical marriage….he’s on his 3rd wife
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 10:50 am
I don’t think Newt is available right now….he is playing with pixie glitter trying to get in touch with his inner rainbow!
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 10:51 am
He would be an authority on traditional biblical marriage only if he kept the first two wives when he added the third.
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 10:53 am
Praise God. We still have a few people with a sound mind in this state.
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 11:33 am
God has nothing to do with bigotry and religion no place in human law.
Praise Jebus, God hates freewill, Amen
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 11:51 am
Goose-stepping toward a discriminatory constitutional amendment is not a sound mind.
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 12:06 pm
I’m assuming Tim is referring to Kelly, Kriesel and the DFL. Thank God indeed!
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 12:39 pm
The one vote margin is a coordinated thing by Republicans. Most of them aren’t really into this amendment, but they need it to pass so they can bring out the hater-bigot vote in 2012.
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 1:49 pm
Barb – U hit that nail on the head……exactly! The go to the LOWEST common denominator…..FEAR / HATE, typical of the Disgusting GOP……this will do NOTHING for your state but Pit neighbor against Neighbor, and Cement Hard feelings……its over 3yrs since Prop 8 in CA…and Still Hard feeling abound, neighbors NO LONGER talk to one another…….this is the GOP stradegy…divide and conquer. The Lemmings can’t even seen beyond thier own bigotry. Im so sick and tired of the GOP Hatefest…..and thier FAKE Christian Values / Sanctity of Marriage BS………When 2 hetero strangers can Get Drunk, fly off to vegas, and go to a Drive Thru and be married by Elvis……..thats Sanctity? They make me sick, they’ve planted themselves on the WRONG side of history, and in the museum of Bigotry next to George Wallace.
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 2:33 pm
As Obama said: “We are too easily distracted!” So much concentration on the “GAY” votes that we as a country have lost sight of what’s really tearing the American family apart! The price of Oil/Gas, the high rise in UNemployment, this WAR… So many other factors.
If 2 ppl love eachother, they should be able to express it on paper! Question: Why haven’t we shut down the Catholic Church? Or are Catholic priest the only ppl allowed to be openly gay?
I’m here! I’m gay! And I feel like if I pay taxes in this corrupt & failing economy I should be able to marry my girlfriend! What I do & who I do it with will not hurt anyone’s family! I promise everyone around me is so loving & so accepting. It may have taken some of them longer than others, but LOVE conquers all!
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 2:56 pm
How’s that Economy going for you right now? You DO know that there is a BOYCOTT brewing, right? Maybe if fair-minded people just don’t buy Minnesota, or visit, or HIRE in your state, the bigots will finally get the message that EQUALITY is something everyone deserves.
The Bible is a book of FAITH, not FACT. Quit using it to Oppress others.
Comment posted May 18, 2011 @ 3:40 pm
What needs to begin right as soon as practicable is an effort to identify every business, individual and organization that is donating money to support this amendment.
We then need a massive campaign to boycott every business in the state that does so, but especially in the metro area where the bigots are strongly outnumbered by the decent people. A serious effort could put any number of businesses out of business if they support this hate-motivated amendment. Helpful signs could be taped to establishments to alert non-bigots to avoid said business.
Pingback posted May 18, 2011 @ 10:13 pm
[...] The Minnesota Independent reported that several protesters shouted “Shame!” and “You are damaging my life and my family!” while roll call was being taken. [...]
Pingback posted May 19, 2011 @ 1:15 am
[...] MN: In Close Vote, Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment Moves to House Floor. Read more [...]
Comment posted May 19, 2011 @ 9:53 am
@Eric-
Well put, but let’s not forget the Archdiocese of St Paul, the Minnesota Catholic Conference, the bishops of Minnesota and the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, The Evangelical Lutherans and in all likelihood the Mormon Church, and those watchtower people.
The most visible error of this amendment is the extent to which it represents a forcible intrusion by organized religions into the lives of all citizens, particularly those that don’t belong to any of the above groups or hold differing religious views.
Their breaches in Church/State separation allow for easier intrusions in both directions.
Praise Jebus, God hates trespassers in the garden, Amen.
Comment posted May 19, 2011 @ 11:04 am
Carl,
Agreed, most definitely.
At this very moment I’m not sure what’s taking place in St. Paul, but there might be a silver lining to this amendment if it is put on the ballot: it might very well accelerate the already massive trend of defections from Christianity currently taking place in the US. (People who declare themselves to have no religion are the most quickly growing category vis-a-vis religion in America.) This in turn will erode the power base of these religious institutions, probably permanently, and make it very difficult for them in the future to run roughshod over the rights of others.
Pingback posted May 22, 2011 @ 1:59 pm
[...] been thought by nearly everyone that passage was a foregone conclusion, but there has been a bump or two or three along the way, with two Republicans openly opposing the ban and others refusing to say how [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







