In 2006, Pastor Mac Hammond stood up before his Living Word Christian Center audience in Brooklyn Park and said, “I can tell you personally that I’m going to vote for Michele Bachmann, because I’ve come to know her, what she stands for.” That speech prompted the attention of the Internal Revenue Service for violation of the church’s tax exempt status. The IRS sent the church a letter telling the church it cannot endorse politicians from the pulpit. Despite ample evidence that suggested Hammond knew that what he was doing was illegal, the case was closed.
Now an Arizona-based front group for the religious empire of James (Focus on the Family) Dobson, the Alliance Defense Fund, is encouraging en masse violation of the IRS rule that prohibits clergy from endorsing political candidates. They’re asking ministers of kindred spirit across the country to endorse presidential candidates on Sunday, September 28.
Dubbed the “Pulpit Initiative,” the gambit represents a bet on lax enforcement by the IRS and, ultimately, a free-speech-based challenge to the law by a very conservative US Supreme Court.
Since 1954, churches have been prohibited from explicit involvement in political campaigns. To date, only one church in the last 50 years has lost its tax exemptions. That occurred in 1992, when an outfit called Branch Ministries took out full-page ads in the Washington Times and USA Today proclaiming, “Christian Beware” and warning that Bill Clinton espoused “policies that are in rebellion to God’s Laws.” Federal courts upheld the revocation of Branch Ministries’ tax status.
The ADF says the Pulpit Initiative is to encourage pastors to reclaim “their right to speak Scriptural truth from the pulpit” and to confront “an atmosphere of intimidation and fear for any church that dares to speak Scriptural truth about candidates for office.” The group says it has recruited churches in every state to endorse candidates on the chosen date.
But some clergy and former IRS officials say that ADF is violating the law just by organizing this sort of mass lawbreaking event.
“In the course of organizing and publicizing this event, ADF’s staff of attorneys is inducing churches to engage in conduct designed to violate Federal tax law in a direct and blatant manner,” wrote Mortimer M. Caplin, IRS commissioner during the Kennedy administration; Marcus S. Owens, former head of the IRS’s tax-exempt division; and Cono R. Namorato, the former head of the IRS office of professional responsibility. “This activity — coordinating mass violation of Federal tax law — is clearly ‘incompetent and disreputable conduct’… In our view, these ADF efforts present a direct threat to the integrity of our tax system.”
Beside Hammond’s 2006 endorsement of Bachmann, a northern Minnesota church made news this summer for endorsing Sen. John McCain for president — and flaunting it in the face of the IRS. Rev. Gus Booth, a pastor in Warroad, Minn., and Republican party activist, said in a May sermon, “If you are a Christian, you cannot support Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Both Hillary and Barack favor the shedding of innocent blood [abortion] and the legalization of the abomination of homosexual marriage.”
In a letter in his church bulletin, Booth wrote of the IRS, “I am letting you know that I will not be intimidated into silence when I believe that God wants me to address the great moral issues of the day, including who will be our next national leader.”
According to IRS data, it’s not just the religious right that runs afoul of the IRS. Of the 42 churches that were sent letters by the IRS in 2004, 18 endorsed a GOP candidate, 12 a Democratic and one a Green Party candidate. In 11 instances, the IRS did not determine a party affiliation.
A church in Southern California made news in 2004 when its pastor offered an anti-war sermon and the IRS pursued the case. The church insisted that it did not endorse a candidate. The IRS agreed and dropped the case.
The IRS has also gone after an entire denomination. The tax agency is investigating the United Church of Christ because of a speech that Obama gave at that group’s national meeting last year. Obama is a member of the UCC. That investigation was dropped with no penalties imposed.
The IRS is also investigating a Hartford, Conn., UCC church that Obama spoke at earlier this year.














9 Comments »
Comment posted September 11, 2008 @ 12:54 pm
What's the problem with advocating a person from the pulpit – churches that feel compelled to do so should go ahead, hold to their principles and go forward – no one, the government or otherwise is trying to STOP them – and the only consequence is losing tax exempt status. Dr. Dobson should be brave and bold enough to promote that churches forgo tax exemption in order to express their opinions of politicians and who to vote for. The church is holding itself hostage by wanting to have it all – having the law adjust to them. They are missing the opportunity to be truly radical in this culture, and go forward, and taking the costs of holding firm.
Comment posted September 11, 2008 @ 5:03 pm
George Carlin:
Think about it. Religion has actually convinced people that there’s an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever ’til the end of time! But He loves you. He loves you, and He needs money! He always needs money! He’s all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, somehow just can’t handle money! Religion takes in billions of dollars, they pay no taxes, and they always need a little more. Now, you talk about a good bulls**** story. Holy ****!”
Comment posted September 11, 2008 @ 7:01 pm
Correction to inaccurate information in the article — IRS is not now investigating the UCC; please see below.
Re: UCC investigation – this from the UCC web site:
Concluding its UCC inquiry, IRS offers complete vindication
Written by J. Bennett Guess
May 21, 2008
The Internal Revenue Service has concluded that the UCC did not violate tax laws when U.S. Sen. Barack Obama addressed the denomination's 50th anniversary General Synod in Hartford, Conn., in June 2007.
“Based on your response to the inquiry, we have determined that the activity about which we had concern did not constitute an intervention or participation in a political campaign … and that the United Church of Christ continues to qualify as an organization described in section 501(c)(3),” according to a May 13 letter from the IRS.
* * * * * * *
In addition, please note that in terms of this story, the UCC situation is an orange offered in the context of several apples.
Comment posted September 11, 2008 @ 8:12 pm
A fine idea…..Wait till they get their tax bill…….
Comment posted September 12, 2008 @ 3:25 am
Where have all the sane Christians gone?? Tax these ignorant devisive fools! They have destroyed what little was good about religion!
Comment posted September 12, 2008 @ 5:24 pm
I've linked to your article from Against pressure the religious right is working hard to get the vote out
Comment posted September 14, 2008 @ 3:05 pm
They're not just violating US tax law, but are weakening (shredding?) the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Maybe the IRS should send out pre-emptive letters right now .
Jim Ohern in his comment asks, ” What's the problem with advocating a person from the pulpit?” The problem, Mr. Ohern, is that our founders deliberately forbade the establishment of a state religion after living through the effects of such arrangements before coming to America. Jesus said we should render unto Caeser's what is Caeser's and to God what is His, not that whatever religion happened to have its member(s) in positions of political power should use that power to influence what are supposed to be elections free of such pressures and, by so doing, attempt to make their particular beliefs the law of the land.
Comment posted September 15, 2008 @ 11:19 am
It should never be “breaking the law” for an American pastor to preach from the Bible in his pulpit. That should be true whether the pastor is talking about a virtuous Christian, a promiscuous celebrity, a noted criminal, a local hero, or even one of America’s future leaders. And it was true from the time the Constitution was ratified in 1787 until 1954. For 167 years, churches freely preached directly on political candidates’ qualifications for office. That was no problem under the Constitution, or when the first Commissioner of Internal Revenue was appointed in 1862, or when the federal income tax was authorized by the 16th Amendment in 1913. Nor were churches transformed into political machines. Churches simply spoke when their moral voice needed to be heard—even during election season—and decided for themselves how they wanted their pastors to preach.
When the IRS code was amended in 1954 to ban “intervention” in political campaigns, it was an act of political retaliation by then-Senator Lyndon Johnson against two anti-communist groups. It had nothing to do with “church politicking,” and scholars agree that churches were not the target of the regulation. It's time for the churches to exercise their constitutional rights as they were guaranteed, not as they have been gutted by the tax code. That’s not “civil disobedience.” Its called “free speech” and the “free exercise of religion.” It's called upholding and defending our constitutional rights. For more information, click here.
Erik Stanley
Senior Legal Counsel
Alliance Defense Fund
Comment posted September 29, 2008 @ 12:05 pm
Voter Issue Guide: 2008 Presidential Race
http://www.afa.net/08VG/indexhtml
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment