In selling parkland to pay bills, mighty Duluth joins little Lilydale

By Chris Steller
Friday, September 12, 2008 at 8:46 am

Recent headlines out of Duluth haven’t been pretty — except when they’ve been over pictures of the Tiffany window that the city may auction off to get out of a $6.5 million budget hole. City officials’ efforts to sell off another public asset — parkland along picturesque Park Point — puts Duluth in the same league as one of the Twin Cities metro area’s tiniest towns: little Lilydale, Minn.

That mini-municipality decided last spring to put up for sale a less-than-one-acre park parcel on a bluff overlooking the Mississippi River as a way to erase its own $230,000 debt in one fell swoop. (UPDATE: Lilydale City Clerk Joan Olin informs MnIndy: “We are selling the property. The current amount is $249,000. With the market as it is, it has not yet sold.”) In both cases the properties had been donated as dedicated city parkland, but legal oversights left them vulnerable to re-purposing as cash cows.

Even amid sizable city layoffs, fire truck decommissionings, and library and school cutbacks, the sale of the parkland and the Tiffany window have attracted attention as marquee public assets, the sale of which would be key money-makers in the effort to balance the city’s budget. Duluth councilors put off a decision on the window Monday but voted to rezone the parkland for residential development, hoping to unload the 425 feet of Lake Superior frontage for $1.5 million. That’s half the world-record $3 million take they expect to get for “Minnehaha,” the Tiffany window.

“Minnehaha” will head to an auction house for an October sale if no local buyer comes forward by Sept. 17. Environmental groups don’t have much more time to seal a deal for the parkland, and the city’s rezoning action may have upped the pricetag beyond the reach of nonprofit purses. The state Department of Natural Resources, which already owns 18 acres of forest on Park Point, has so far demurred on buying the property.

Park Point native and current resident Jake Kapsner tells the Minnesota Independent that he understands the difficult financial position Duluth Mayor Don Ness and city councilors find themselves in, as they make cuts in basic city services. But still, Kapsner said, he wonders about selling off public assets like parkland and art: “What do you get rid of to solve [what may be] temporary situations?”

Categories & Tags: | | | | |

Comments

2 Comments

berylkgullsgate
Comment posted September 12, 2008 @ 10:57 am

Quick fix/ a bad idea: the domino effect of selling park land is one issue…but the dominant issue is that all the land at the end of the Park Point (Minnesota Point) and the beaches rolling out to the seawall -lakeside- were given to Duluth by the state for public use; public recreation back in 1939…

“Said conveyance shall be made upon the condition that the city of Duluth shall use said land for the purpose of public recreation and public health and the facilities provided on said land shall be open on equal terms to all persons whether residents Duluth or elsewhere, and that title and said lands shall be entitled to take possession thereof upon breach of aforesaid conditions”…” for the establishment and maintenance of a public park”

Considering condo or residential development on any portion of that land specifically given by the state to Duluth for “public recreation” as falls under the the legal conveyance and any use of a portion for other than public recreation suggests that the land as defined in the conveyance, could be returned to the state. Yes, it's a complicated can of worms*, and neither a practical nor viable alternative to get Duluth out of debt.

* Can of worms of past abuse: airport development for commercial purposes on “Conveyance” land given for public recreation…”equal terms to all persons”…plus the old growth forest has been abused by periodic cutting of trees for runway development etc. (“maintenance?”)…plus add an Indian burial ground unmaintained also?

This may be one lawlerly playgound that may not add but empty the city's frugal pockets?


berylkgullsgate
Comment posted September 12, 2008 @ 11:02 am

typo: last line “lawyerly”


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.