birthcontrol_500

Catholic physicians’ group doesn’t want contraception covered by – or mentioned in – Affordable Care Act

By Ashley Lopez
Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 9:47 am

St. Gianna Physician’s Guild, a group of Catholic physicians, have launched an online campaign asking Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the Obama administration “to immediately withdraw all references to contraception and contraception counseling from the ‘Guidelines for Women’s Preventive Services’ under the Affordable Care Act, and to provide a conscience clause to protect the religious freedom and beliefs of Catholics.”

Catholic medical providers, insurers and others have been the biggest opponents to a recent decision by the federal health agency to require insurers to include contraception on a list of preventative medical services through the Affordable Care Act. This would allow women to buy birth control pills, for example, without having to make a co-payment, which can make contraception unaffordable for many women.

Despite an expressed exception for “religious institutions that offer insurance to their employees,” Catholic Bishops, Catholic hospitals and other Catholic groups have publicly expressed opposition to the exception because “it is too limited.”

According to a St. Gianna press release:

On August 1, 2011 the Department of Health and Human Services directed by Kathleen Sebelius, a Catholic, adopted new guidelines for women’s health that stipulates mandatory coverage be provided for surgical sterilization, all prescription contraceptives approved by the FDA — including drugs like Ella that can cause abortions in the early weeks of pregnancy – as well as counseling to promote them.

“We are going to send a message to the Obama Administration that this contraception mandate is wrong, discriminatory and violates the religious rights of Catholics all across America,” stated the Guild’s president, Thomas McKenna.

The Obama administration is taking heat from many Catholic leaders including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, Archbishop of Galveston-Houston and chairman of the USCCB Committee on Pro-Life Activities, said: “Those who sponsor, purchase and issue health plans should not be forced to violate their deeply held moral and religious convictions in order to take part in the health care system or provide for the needs of their families or their employees.

“To force such an unacceptable choice would be as much a threat to universal access to health care as it is to freedom of conscience.”

The group’s petition was announced Monday.

Comments

26 Comments

Roman
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 10:16 am

Keep Catholic and religious dogma out of our health care and sciences – and our right to make our own medical choices and decisions with our doctors and care givers. If you want as many baies as humanly possible, then don’t use contraception. If you want to exploit and prevent millions of poor women access to affordable care and choices, that’s on your soul.


John I
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 10:48 am

Freekin morons!! This is why christians need to just keep to themselves. Birth control is a poor name for this medication. This pill enables women to properly regulate hormonal activity in their body. Not everyone that takes it to prevent births. Some women actualy take it to enable them to get pregnant. Some women need to take it to actualy function during pms. The benefits of these pills to women is massive. All christians want to do is destroy our quality of life.


Randy
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 11:24 am

The men (and I use the term advisedly) neeed to realize that, in a pluralistic, officially religion-neutral society such as our own, there will be things that, on occasion, go against minority religious beliefs. In other words, not everyone in the country is Catholic–cope!

PS Every Catholic woman I’ve dated has taken birth-control pills. It seems it’s not that difficult to convince your priest that one is doing it solely for menstural difficulties.


Jeff Wilfahrt
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 1:08 pm

Four hundred years to recognize Galileo… need I say more.

Jeff Wilfahrt, Rosemount, MN


Chayanov
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 2:40 pm

Jeff, unfortunately we don’t have the luxury of that kind of time. Also, how is it not a violation of your Constitutional rights when your doctor or pharmacist can impose their religious views upon you?


Eric
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 3:25 pm

Who speaks for Catholicism? The Church and its institutions, or the majority of Catholics who use birth control and are pro-choice?


Mike
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 3:51 pm

Anyone who believes the Christian delusion is a TOOL and not living in modern day reality. C’mon people WAKE UP and think for yourself beyond the religious GARBAGE and the FANATICS who vomit this rubbish about morality of right or wrong. Especially from an organization that harbors and protects its pedophile priests. These people are SEVERELY mentally dysfunctional. The world is over populated and eventually resources will diminish as the human (locusts) devour and consume and pollute the planet. THE HUMAN RACE NEEDS CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION TO SURVIVE it’s mass population explosions. Read a National Geographic once a while… put the silly Bible fairytale book away.


C Dungan
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 4:36 pm

Can you imagine the outcry and hysteria if Muslim clerics were demanding that the health care law include Islam-based care decisions that would apply to everyone??


Diane
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 4:43 pm

Wishing and hoping that restricting access to birth control will somehow simultaneously end abortion, make every child a wanted child, restore the “traditional” family, get every woman back into the kitchen (barefoot and pregnant), make all children unquestioningly obey their parents, make all the gays suddenly and convincingly heterosexual, and bring back the days when we could be burned at the stake or thrown in jail for not being Christian or Muslim or whatever religion holds the political power is exactly that – wishing and hoping. And it’s just as likely to happen as just about every other form of magical thinking.

Fortunately for me and the rest of the realists, I’ve got data to support the idea that access to contraception not only promotes health worldwide, but it actually decreases abortion and also decreases maternal mortality. That’s right, folks. Fewer women die when everyone has access to reliable family planning. Although WOMEN’S LIVES mean very little when compared to a couple million sperm, an embyro or a fetus. Obviously.


Scott
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 8:13 pm

Why is it that people who want catholics to recognize their right to make their medical choices want to discriminate against catholics. Making catholics pay for someone else’s birth control is not acceptable. Should the folks who can not afford the birth control want it, then some of you who want to pay for it should start your own group and do just that.


Kate
Comment posted August 24, 2011 @ 9:00 pm

@Diane—thanks for the great posting.


C.L. Ward
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 2:31 am

1974: 83% of Catholics disagreed with the contraception ban.

1989: 44% of Catholic women used contraception.

1999: 80% of Catholics thought contraception was compatible with being a good Catholic.

2002: 97% of American Catholic women over 18 had used a banned form of contraception (same as the general public).

2005: 90% of Catholics supported the use of birth control.

http://myperiodblog.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/cath


Laurie
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 7:04 am

Agreed, great post Diane


chuck
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 9:01 am

Yes Scott it’s all about the money. Really?


Randy
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 10:42 am

Scott, I’m sure Jews and Muslims don’t like the idea that the government helps subsidize pork production, or serve pork in military mess halls, or allow people to use food stamps to buy Spam. Is that discrimination against them, or is it only discrimination when your priest tells you it is?


Paul V
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 11:19 am

HHHMMMM lets see birth contol pills verses thousands and 10′s of thousands of unwanted babies.

@Scott,
No brainer. You can pay for it now or pay for it later.


Scott
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 12:47 pm

Different Scott here:).

Let’s keep in mind that even though the Catholic church doesn’t grasp it, birth control is part of health care. So as employers offering their employees health coverage, they need to follow the law. Sorry other Scott, but the church needs to understand that there are community standards to health care. Religious exemptions stop when it means that lives are balance.

Also with the world adding a net 9000 lives every hour, it’s time to stop adding new humans to the planet. So it’s time to drop bronze age opinions about sexuality and reproduction.


Disgusted American
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 3:24 pm

The Earth has 7+ BILLION people……..we dont need anymore then we have……..Glad Im 51yrs old…cause 30-40yrs from now – good luck getting Fresh Drinking Water, especially after the GOP deregulates everything – and EVERYTHING is Polluted (ground,air,water, and food) ……You can’t drink Money $$$ ….gettting a shower everyday WILL BE A luxury of the distant past………


Dave
Comment posted August 25, 2011 @ 10:10 pm

“Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great.
If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite iraaaaaate! ”

Sorry, but someone was going to bring that up sooner or later.


cyberstorm
Comment posted August 26, 2011 @ 9:44 am

I don’t want doctors of “faith” making my decisions for me or my family.

I am for allowing those to make decisions based on what they seem they need to do.
Birth controls helps things like very uncomfortable “times of month”, and it has been a savior for those who use this method. It isn’t “just” for prevention of unwanted pregnancies. Although that is a proper thing to consider.


Mike
Comment posted August 26, 2011 @ 10:38 am

Dian and Paul V, YOU ROCK


Texasrose
Comment posted August 26, 2011 @ 7:08 pm

Basically these Catholic doctors, insurers, and hospitals want everyone that work for them to abide by the Catholic faith’s rules on birth control, regardless of what those employees’ personal beliefs might be.


marie
Comment posted August 31, 2011 @ 1:05 pm

@ Scott the pro ban one that is.

As soon as the Catholic churches pay taxes you can have your argument how about that?

Religious laws can NOT and will NOT be American.

I do NOT want my tax dollar’s EVER EVER EVER EVER spent to cover anything a Catholic church does, but the Catholic church has Tax exemption, so I DO pay for Catholics to worship.

The Christian religion goes against every thing I stand for, but as an American I believe in Free speech, therefore I will continue to subsidize your house of worship.

Its against millions of peoples religions to not eat meat. Should we not subsidize any meat for the country? Should poor people not be able to buy meat with their food stamps? Should it be against the law to mention meat in any documentation that is government? In your thought process all schools should not serve any meat at all cause it goes against their religion and therefore all schools should stay neutral on all meat products ever!


marie
Comment posted August 31, 2011 @ 3:48 pm

The Problem with Christians like Scott is that they think their God, their Religion should be indoctrinated onto everyone. They do NOT understand that Religion is a choice, and a lifestyle, they do not get that movements like the Catholics trying to hush the word of contraception is a Radical Religious Agenda.

I do not support your lifestyle, although I accept it.


Wendy Leigh
Comment posted September 8, 2011 @ 11:57 am

Hippocratic Oath

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures which are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon’s knife or the chemist’s drug.

I will not be ashamed to say “I know not,” nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.

This is a clear violation of this oath and condition to practice medicine.


Guy Western
Comment posted September 9, 2011 @ 9:06 am

I will suggest that the Catholic Church, its leadership, and each and every one of its members has a great deal of work to do cleaning its own house before ever, ever going around making moral pronouncements to anyone about anything.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.