Minnesota Bishops object to contraceptives in health care reform

By Andy Birkey
Friday, September 30, 2011 at 8:58 am

St. Paul Cathedral. Source: Wikipedia

Minnesota’s Catholic bishops sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Thursday urging her department to drop a mandate on health insurance companies to cover birth control as part of their health plans.

The bishops argue that entities like Catholic Charities would have to offer insurance plans to their employees that offer coverage for contraceptives or else stop providing health benefits to employees.“While we support providing access to those services which can truly prevent disease or disability for woman such as pap smears and mammograms, we join other persons of good will who strenuously object to mandatory coverage for contraceptives and sterilization procedures,” the bishops wrote in the letter (PDF).

In August, the Obama administration announced that it would mandate that private health insurance cover women’s health care services such as cancer screenings, domestic violence support and birth control. The Catholic Church believes that birth control methods other than the rhythm method are sinful.

The bishops said the rule would “require taxpayers and providers to act against deeply-held convictions regarding the sanctity of life, as the promotion and provision of drugs like “Ella” (ulipristal acetate) and other abortifacient agents are enabled by this mandate.”

Coverage of abortion services is not included in the mandate. Calling drugs like Ella abortifacients is not the legal definition; they don’t actually cause abortions. However, as Christianity Today noted, the Catholic Church and other conservative Christians view the drug as abortion-inducing from a moral perspective.

The bishops also object to the current “conscience clause” in the mandate.

A religious organization is exempt from the mandate so long as it “has as the inculcation of religious values as its purpose, primarily employs persons who share its religious tenets, and primarily serves persons who share its religious tenets.”

The bishops worry that religious charities would either have to provide health coverage that offers birth control or opt not to cover their employees at all.

“By exempting only those who employ and/or serve persons of the same religious tradition from its mandates, Catholic health care providers—the safety net for many of our marginalized sisters and brothers—cannot enjoy the exception without abandoning our mission, to the significant detriment of those in need.”

“Requiring Catholic individuals and institutions to pay for and provide abortion drugs and contraceptives contrary to Catholic teaching in the name of ‘reproductive autonomy’ is an unprecedented attack on the cherished liberties of religious and associational freedom,” said Jason Adkins, executive director of the Minnesota Catholic Conference, the public policy arm of the Roman Catholic Church in Minnesota.

Minnesota’s Catholic bishops are the latest in a long list of Catholic institutions that have spoken out against the policy, as have Catholic hospitals. At least 18 Catholic institutions of higher learning have come out against the rule as well as the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

But, as our sister site the Florida Independent recently reported, not all Catholics agree with the hierarchy. In fact, some see the exception for religious institutions as dangerous for women.

“In allowing religious institutions to refuse to include contraceptive services in the health insurance plans they offer their employees, the Obama administration has once again sided with the Catholic bishops over the needs of women and their families,” said Jon O’Brien, president of Catholics for Choice. “The multi-billion dollar Catholic health care industry has a lot of influence with this administration, influence that it has now used to allow religious institutions to ride roughshod over the needs of their workers. Not only that, it ignores the consciences of those who decide that to use a modern method of family planning is what is best for them and their families.”

In fact, recent polling suggests that most Catholic women could benefit from the mandate. A poll released in April showed that only 2 percent of sexually active women followed Catholic teaching on birth control. Ninety-eight percent of Catholic women have used some form of birth control that is banned by the Church.

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

12 Comments

Eric
Comment posted September 30, 2011 @ 9:50 am

“In fact, recent polling suggests that most Catholic women could benefit from the mandate. A poll released in April showed that only 2 percent of sexually active women followed Catholic teaching on birth control. Ninety-eight percent of Catholic women have used some form of birth control that is banned by the Church.”

The Catholic hierarchy would have you believe the following: an aging fraternity of celibate sex and relationship experts knows what’s best for you in your bedroom. They know how you should be having sex, with whom, when, and even whether you should have children or not. How do they know this? Why, they have penises of course and don’t use them (in theory). What more proof do you need of their unimpeachable wisdom?


Katie B.
Comment posted September 30, 2011 @ 2:40 pm

Who are “persons of good will” who strenuously object to mandatory coverage for contraceptives? NO ONE. No “person of good will” objects to health care coverage for contraceptives, this is a red herring to cover the fact that they are maliciously imposing their religious doctrine.


Health Insurance Pro » Blog Archive » Health Care Law Takes Twisted Path To The Supreme Court (SLIDESHOW)
Pingback posted September 30, 2011 @ 2:55 pm

[...] the bishops wrote in the l…………… continues on Minnesota Independent … Read the full article View Comments Something to [...]


Kate
Comment posted September 30, 2011 @ 10:01 pm

Try to imagine what this world would be like if modern contraceptives had not been invented. Scary. This overcrowded planet would be busting at the seams.

It sounds like these bishops want to take Catholic women back to the time when family planning was the rhythm method and women didn’t have any choices about their lives. And how much do celibate Catholics priests know about sex, birth control, family planning…??? Ridiculous.


Administration should deny bishops’ request for a veto over women’s healthcare – The Hill (blog) | Health News
Pingback posted October 1, 2011 @ 5:53 am

[...] Exemptions and Contraceptive Coverage: How Far Can Denial Go and …RH Reality Check (blog)Minnesota Bishops object to contraceptives in health care reformMinnesota Independentall 69 news articles » womenshealth – Google News Share and [...]


Administration should deny bishops’ request for a veto over women’s healthcare – The Hill (blog) | Health News
Pingback posted October 1, 2011 @ 9:25 am

[...] Exemptions and Contraceptive Coverage: How Far Can Denial Go and …RH Reality Check (blog)Minnesota Bishops object to contraceptives in health care reformMinnesota Independentall 66 news articles » womenshealth – Google News Share and [...]


Administration should deny bishops’ request for a veto over women’s healthcare – The Hill (blog) | Skyrama News
Pingback posted October 1, 2011 @ 3:08 pm

[...] Exemptions and Contraceptive Coverage: How Far Can Denial Go and …RH Reality Check (blog)Minnesota Bishops object to contraceptives in health care reformMinnesota Independentall 66 news articles » womenshealth – Google News Share and [...]


Roman
Comment posted October 2, 2011 @ 9:12 am

The Bishops need to keep their religious dogma to themselves and away from our health care decision and civil rights. Their legacy of harm, ignorance and persecution is insidious.


Glynis
Comment posted October 3, 2011 @ 10:06 am

they offer health insurance that doesn’t cover contraceptives now? Do they also not cover drugs like Viagra?


Shannon
Comment posted October 3, 2011 @ 3:51 pm

Keep your church out of my uterus. I fail to see how celibate men could possibly claim the right to interfere in the reproductive decisions of women. Apparently 98% of Catholic women agree. Besides, this is the institution currently being investigated for a global, systemic pedophilia problem. And this same institution wants to tell people it’s wrong to have protected sex between consenting adults? Unreal.


Dianna
Comment posted October 3, 2011 @ 4:46 pm

When o when will we finally disqualify the Catholic church’s tax exempt status.


Carol Larsen
Comment posted October 9, 2011 @ 9:41 pm

With the population growth as high as it is, it seems both aggogant and ignorant to miantain that articficial methods of birth control are immoral. Many sexual acts are indeed immoral, but adding the possiblilty of preganancy surely compounds the difficulty. One hopes that teenagers, for instance, making love in the back seat of a car or wherever, adulterous spouses, those with AIds, etc. use very effective birth control indeed. It is foolish and dangerous to assert otherwise.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.