Activists in Inver Grove Heights move to derail domestic partner registry

By Andy Birkey
Tuesday, October 11, 2011 at 3:54 pm

The Inver Grove Heights City Council is considering a domestic partner registry, a mostly symbolic move that would provide proof of a couple’s domestic partnership in some insurance situations or public accommodations, but conservative activists are threatening to marshall the city’s pastors to block the move.

In a public comment period at Monday night’s city council meeting, Ted Trenzeluk, a Republican activist, threatened to rally the city’s pastors to lobby the council if they didn’t drop the measure immediately.

Trenzeluk printed pages off the website of OutFront Minnesota, the state’s largest LGBT advocacy organization, about domestic partner registries and handed them to the council to back up his argument that the registry is just one step on the way to full marriage rights for gay people.

“This is not a website I go to often,” he joked.

Trenzeluk said the domestic partner registry, which would be open to all couples regardless of gender, was merely a plot to get gay marriage passed in Minnesota.

“Make no mistake the main purpose of this type of legislation is a salvo in the lead up to the marriage amendment that is going to be up next year,” Trenzeluk said. “The city should not be used as a pawn in somebody’s political agenda.”

Trenzeluk was referring to a constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage which will be on the ballot in 2012. The registry is being proposed in the city, in part, because same-sex couples currently cannot marry, form a civil union or enter into a publicly recognized domestic partnership under current Minnesota law.

“I’d like you are to consider killing this because my personal promise to you is that I will call every pastor in Inver Grove Heights” if the council doesn’t vote down the measure, he said.

Trenzeluk is a delegate at large for the Republican Party in the 2nd Congressional District. His presentation seemed to have swayed at least one vote on the council.

Dennis Madden said the registry might represent “a complete change in our laws and morals in this county.”

“This may change my mind,” Madden said of the materials Trenzeluk handed out. “If this is just a step in that direction, I’m opposed 100 percent. When I see this kind of stuff going on in my country, I don’t like it.”

Several other residents testified against the registry saying it would lead to the breakdown of the family.

The council voted to table the proposed ordinance for a future date.

So far, 14 communities have approved of domestic partner registries including Shoreview, Minneapolis, Duluth, St. Paul, Edina, Golden Valley, Rochester, Maplewood, Richfield, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Hopkins, Red Wing and Falcon Heights.

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

6 Comments

Joe
Comment posted October 11, 2011 @ 5:31 pm

“Several other residents testified against the registry saying it would lead to the breakdown of the family.” Show me one place where giving same sex couples domestic partner benefits has “led to the breakdown of family.” One. Just one. I’m waiting on it.


Jeff Wilfahrt
Comment posted October 11, 2011 @ 6:13 pm

The sky is falling, the sky is falling cried the little red hen! (aka Ted Trenzeluk)

Would you trust your children with Ted? I know I wouldn’t have.

Jeff Wilfahrt, Rosemount, MN


Melanie
Comment posted October 11, 2011 @ 9:25 pm

I grew up in Inver Grove, and my parents still live there. I attended Good Shepherd Lutheran for years, was confirmed there, and was actually a Sunday School teacher for a few years. This guy does NOT speak for me. I will ask my parents to tell their council members that there are Christians who support the domestic partner registry.


Adam
Comment posted October 12, 2011 @ 11:42 am

Thanks Melanie! That’s only way to prove to the Ted Trenzeluks of this world that their scapegoating of LGBT families is unwelcome. It’s only when the local citizens — and especially people of faith — speak up for equal treatment for all families that we’ll move away from this hysteria about “a complete change in our laws and morals.” Truth be told, our laws and morals have been changing — getting better and better — for years. Let’s not stop now.


Sean
Comment posted October 13, 2011 @ 1:46 pm

“The city should not be used as a pawn in somebody’s political agenda.”

Right… and threatening to block the legislation by calling all the pastors in Inver Grove ISN’T an example of political agenda. This is something that all politicians (although lately the more hardcore liberal/conservative) don’t seem to understand. Trying to block legislation is as much political agenda as the legislation itself. Don’t feign sticking up for the rights of the average joe from some agenda because the fact of the matter is that your actions are agenda therein of themselves.


Peter Gokey
Comment posted October 14, 2011 @ 12:39 pm

It’s really arrogant of him to assume that all pastors in Inver Grove Heights automatically oppose equality measures.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.