For the second time in as many weeks, Rep. Michele Bachmann has manufactured media events to tout her congressional support for local causes, when in fact, she has voted against funding for those causes.
On September 4, the Stillwater Republican was joined by Interior Department and U.S. Fish & Wildlife officials at the Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge in Zimmerman where, her newsletter reported, “Congresswoman Bachmann and local volunteers from Friends of Sherburne NWR will present plans for a Discovery Center at the refuge.” Bachmann presented herself as an ardent supporter of the proposed $6 million center, posing for pictures out in the refuge alongside officials and a volunteer.
What Bachmann didn’t mention in her newsletter or to reporters covering the event was that last year she voted against the FY 2008 Appropriations Bill for the Interior Department, the funding bill for the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, which manages Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge. She went even further and voted three times to cut funding for the agency. And Bachmann voted to strip funding for 11 individual projects in the bill—projects not unlike the refuge Discovery Center.
In addition to Bachmann’s antipathy toward funding the very agency that manages Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge, Bachmann’s self-imposed pledge against seeking budget earmarks would appear to rule out that source for funding of the visitor center as well.
Sue Hix, president of Friends of Sherburne National Refuge, is spearheading the drive to build the new center.
“We’re planning on raising most of the money ourselves, ” says Hix. Despite Bachmann’s appearance at the refuge, and discussion of the need for federal funding for the center, she has committed to nothing at this point.
Bachmann also paid a visit to the HealthEast Woodwinds Health Campus in Woodbury recently where, according to the Woodbury Bulletin, “HealthEast wanted to thank the congresswoman for her support on the appropriations award funded through the Labor Health and Human Services and Education bill.”
But once again, Bachmann’s voting record belies her public statements of support. She repeatedly voted against the FY 2008 appropriations bill for the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and related agencies. She voted to eliminate funding for a wide variety of individual items in that bill also. The appropriations bill passed but was vetoed by President Bush. Then Bachmann stood with the President and voted against the veto override attempt, which failed.




10 Comments »
Comment posted September 16, 2008 @ 2:12 pm
Wouldn't she make a great Secretary of the Interior in a Palin administration?
(I mean, of course, a Michael Palin administration.)
Comment posted September 16, 2008 @ 2:12 pm
I know, it's not funny. I'm crying inside.
Comment posted September 16, 2008 @ 6:36 pm
Talk about lipstick on a pig!
Comment posted September 16, 2008 @ 9:06 pm
On tonight's (Sept 16 2008) CNN Larry King Live, Congresswoman Michelle Bachman claimed that Senator Obama's healthcare plan would provide a fully government run socialized healthcare system. Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz from Florida said Bachman was “just making this up.” Who is telling the truth? I think most persons in Minnesota probably know. Sigh.
Comment posted September 16, 2008 @ 11:06 pm
how did she even get elected? it must the the palin factor…
Comment posted September 17, 2008 @ 5:06 am
Are there ANY clear and focused photos of Ms. Bachmann available anywhere?
Or does her close association with the “Focus on the Family” prohibit any such clarity?
I am getting so tired of these vaseline & cheesecloth images of Bachmann and McCain…
Comment posted September 17, 2008 @ 8:16 am
Bachmann presented herself as an ardent supporter
In that article? No, she didn't, but another person did. And since when is the only definition of support, “I will get federal funds for you”?
And Bachmann voted to strip funding for 11 individual projects in the bill—projects not unlike the refuge Discovery Center.
Is this a clever way of saying that she didn't actually not financially support the project that you are accusing her of not financially-supporting-but-then-saying-she-financially-supports?
Bachmann also paid a visit to the HealthEast Woodwinds Health Campus in Woodbury recently where, according to the Woodbury Bulletin, “HealthEast wanted to thank the congresswoman for her support on the appropriations award funded through the Labor Health and Human Services and Education bill.”
Wow. I'm impressed that Michelle Bachmann has time to write articles about herself in the Woodbury Bulletin. I had no idea the readership was such an important voting bloc. It certainly wasn't written by someone else! And, anyway, it's totally impossible for a representative to vote against a bill because s/he doesn't like some of the items. No one's ever done that before!
It's wonderful what passes for reporting these days. Viva la blogs, bringing crappy journalism to the masses.
Comment posted September 18, 2008 @ 7:32 am
Tipper, how does your comment improve on crappy journalism? Your comment is unclear, because you don’t state your points — instead you ask questions. You also use sarcasm. Sarcasm is an ineffective way to make a point. Then you end your comment with insults. Your comment is just more of the same thing — poorly constructed comments without value.
Comment posted September 18, 2008 @ 4:20 pm
NotMe,
The difference is that I’m not purporting to be a journalist.
My point is that the post is fabricating the idea that Michelle Bachmann is taking credit for things she chose to not fund. If the author could point out somewhere that Michelle Bachmann herself is saying, “I totally support financially and otherwise these specific things and always have,” it’d be a different story. That is, an accurate one.
Comment posted October 1, 2008 @ 12:09 am
I don’t like Michele Bachmann but Tipper is raight, the article is like the ones that claime that Obama is responsable for the thinks his pastor said or the the comment about the lipstik on the pig.
If people are upset about her not voting for a project, they are free to send some of their own money( We still free to do that)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment