Polling on marriage amendment fluctuates wildly a year from vote
Friday, November 11, 2011 at 4:50 am
Four polls have been released this week showing different results among Minnesota’s electorate a year before the the 2012 vote on the controversial amendment to add a ban on same-sex marriage to the state constitution.
Two polls show that the amendment might get defeated while two others show a slight lead for anti-gay marriage activists.
On Thursday, the St. Cloud State University Survey was released showing that 47 percent of Minnesotans thought the constitution should not be amended and 44 percent said it should. The difference is within the poll’s 5 percent margin of error, making the result a statistical tie.
The St. Cloud Times notes that the margin changes drastically depending on what type of phone the user answered: 48 percent of landline phone users supported the amendment compared to 39 percent of cell phone users.
A KSTP/SurveyUSA poll released on Wednesday found that 46 percent of registered voters support the amendment while 40 percent said they would vote against it. Interestingly, the poll also asked whether someone would not vote on the issue, which is considered a “no” vote in Minnesota. Ten percent said they did not plan to vote at all on the question bringing the total of opposition and under-vote to 50 percent, within the poll’s 4.3 percent margin of error making the question a statistical tie.
The landline versus mobile split was also present in the SurveyUSA poll. Only 34 percent of mobile users planned to vote for the amendment while 50 percent of landline users planned to vote for it.
The Star Tribune released its Minnesota poll on Tuesday showing that 48 percent of Minnesotans support the amendment, 43 percent opposed it and 8 percent are undecided. The results were within the poll’s margin of error, meaning that this poll as well was a statistical tie.
The result matches closely with what SurveyUSA found but completely opposite of the St. Cloud State University poll.
The one poll that was an outlier in this week was a poll by QEV Analytics commissioned by Minnesota for Marriage, the group advocating for the gay marriage ban. In that poll, 51 percent of voters said they would vote for the amendment and 40 percent would vote against it.
Minnesota for Marriage released the poll in response to the Star Tribune poll, which the group calls biased.
“The Star Tribune survey showing us with a five point lead substantially understates our true position. This is not surprising given the newspaper’s historic bias against conservative issues and candidates,” Minnesota for Marriage chair John Helmberger said in a statement. “We are releasing our own survey, which utilized the actual wording of the amendment question being presented to voters, to show that we enter the campaign in a very strong position.”
The QEV poll excluded media and political employees and their families from the poll. It asked, “Are you, or anyone in your household, employed with an advertising agency, newspaper, television or radio station, or political campaign?” Anyone who answered in the affirmative was excluded from the poll.
The poll also differed in that it heavily sampled older Minnesotans. Only 35 percent of the poll’s respondents were under age 50, while 60 percent were 50 years old and over.
QEV has been the pollster of choice for the National Organization for Marriage which is part of the Minnesota for Marriage coalition.
9 Comments
Comment posted November 11, 2011 @ 10:54 am
What this really shows is that a year away from the amendment vote we have an incredibly close race and there is some room for movement each way. None of this is/should be a surprise.
It also shows pro-equality voters cannot be complacent. Keep talking to your friends and family and sharing your personal stories. This will be defeated one vote at a time.
I’m my estimation the Survey USA poll asks the proper question because there really are there options; yes, no, or no vote.
Comment posted November 11, 2011 @ 12:45 pm
If 51% would vote for it, and 40% against, that’s only 91%. What was the other 9%? If the other 9% was they wouldn’t vote at all, then the QEV poll would also be a statistical tie.
Pingback posted November 11, 2011 @ 10:37 pm
[...] Full Story from the MN Independent [...]
Comment posted November 13, 2011 @ 2:05 pm
Let’s also remember that this since this is a vote of a constitutional amendment, how you count the votes is a little bit different than a typical election. In sum, if you don’t cast a vote on this on your ballot, it is like a “no” vote.
David Schultz has a nice synopsis on this process here:
http://schultzstake.blogspot.com/2011/05/politics-of-constitutional-amendments.html
Comment posted November 14, 2011 @ 2:20 pm
I will be confident when the polling results show 60 % of people voting NO when asked the question, using the actual language/verbage that will be on the ballot. Unfortunately my gut says that the vote may end up in a re-count. Hopefully with the NO s winning.
Pingback posted November 14, 2011 @ 2:58 pm
[...] worry in Minnesota. Anti-gay activists have placed marriage equality on the ballot next year, and four recent surveys show that voters are falling for the same lies we’ve heard in past electio…. Whether it’s “redefining marriage” or “protecting children,” [...]
Pingback posted November 15, 2011 @ 4:54 pm
[...] worry in Minnesota. Anti-gay activists have placed marriage equality on the ballot next year, and four recent surveys show that voters are falling for the same lies we’ve heard in past electio…. Whether it’s “redefining marriage” or “protecting children,” [...]
Comment posted November 15, 2011 @ 5:59 pm
even if the opposition fails to get the constitutional amendment, they will try over and over again till they do win . we need a supreme court decision. You can’t leave it to the majority to protect the rights of the minority!
Comment posted November 17, 2011 @ 8:31 pm
Voter turnout is going to be key for our side. Get Out The Vote!
Make sure you are registered to vote next year and you will vote NO on the marriage amendment.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






