Sen. Norm Coleman said on the campaign trail Saturday that the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street could eventually become a boon to taxpayers and that firmer regulations might not be the answer.
A very brief look at the history of the current economic crisis betrays Coleman’s optimism.
“The government could make 10 or 20 times what it pays on this, possibly,” said Coleman at Christy’s Cafe in North Mankato.
When the U.S. economy was close to collapse following the deregulation of savings and loans, the federal government bailed out the institutions. At an initial expected cost of $500 billion, an economic turnaround staved off much of the losses with the taxpayers losing only $125 billion, a far cry from Coleman’s expectations of a similar but larger bailout.
As Jeff Fecke notes, in Coleman’s best-case scenario, the taxpayers would see a $14 trillion profit, or more than the gross domestic product of the US for all of 2007.
“Regulation’s not the only solution,” Coleman said, adding that more “transparency” is needed in financial transactions. “Our economic system is like our security system was pre-9/11. We have a regulatory system from the ’50s.”
In fact, for the past 30 years politicians, and especially Republicans, have been passing legislation to deregulate the financial industry. The conservative Heritage Foundation was ecstatic over the deregulation passed in 1999 led by former Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas. Gramm was Sen. John McCain’s campaign co-chair until July 2008 and remains his unofficial economic advisor. Gramm’s bill was signed into law by another fan of deregulation, President Bill Clinton.
That legislation allowed banks to make investments in the types of products that quickly lost them money — investments that were not permitted under previous regulations.
The situation is similar to the deregulation that occurred in the late 1970s and early 1980s that led to the S&L crises, much of it part of the initiatives of the Reagan administration.
James Ridgeway at Mother Jones traces the roots of the deregulation of the financial industry and how many people have signaled warnings along the way.



6 Comments »
Comment posted September 23, 2008 @ 2:08 pm
Shut up, Norm, you damn liar.
Comment posted September 23, 2008 @ 2:13 pm
Would you buy $700b of worthless securitized mortgages from this man?
Comment posted September 23, 2008 @ 9:23 pm
Normy, whatta shill for the thieves. So the Republicans make a last raid on the treasury just before the election with another quicky “emergency bill” that has to be passed “today”. Of course the
dems will vote for it just like Patriot Act, Patriot Act II, FISA, Iraq War, Iran War OK for military action,
and the supreme court right wing.
Let these crooks fail and do what Putin did to the billionaires that tried to take over Russia, he put the crooks in jail.
Comment posted September 24, 2008 @ 4:24 am
Andy, please do an article about the real perpetuators of this crime… Senator Chris Dodd D-CT Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and Representative Barney Frank D-MA Chairman of the House Finance Committee. Both of these dirtbags looked the other way while receiving campaign contributions (bribes) from Bear Stearns, AIG, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Countrywide among others. Lets see you do an investigative article on these two rats rather than finger point and blame Conservatives…
Thanks!
Pingback posted September 24, 2008 @ 8:25 am
[...] More from Andy Birkey. Norman has, of course, backed off this ridiculous claim, saying he meant historically speaking. I’d love to see some proof — any proof — that this has ever been true. [...]
Comment posted September 24, 2008 @ 10:34 am
Keep trying, Rick, someone out there will believe you.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment