<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota Independent &#187; connecticut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/tag/connecticut/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Connecticut Supreme Court says &#8216;yes&#8217; to same-sex marriage</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/12678/connecticut-supreme-court-says-yes-to-same-sex-marriage</link>
		<comments>http://minnesotaindependent.com/12678/connecticut-supreme-court-says-yes-to-same-sex-marriage#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Birkey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OutFront Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=12678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Connecticut will join California and Massachusetts California and Massachusetts as states that allow same-sex couples to enjoy the full rights and responsibilities of marriage, a move that could put the issue squarely on the agenda for a presidential race that has largely ignored social wedge issues in favor of a focus on a bleak economic future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/rings.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-12734" title="rings" src="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/rings.jpg" alt="" width="125" height="94" /></a>Connecticut will <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/nyregion/11marriage.html?hp">join California and Massachusetts</a> as states that allow same-sex couples to enjoy the full rights and responsibilities of marriage, a move that could put the issue squarely on the agenda for a presidential race that has largely ignored social wedge issues in favor of a focus on a bleak economic future.<span id="more-12678"></span></p>
<p>The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that a statutory ban on same-sex marriage violated the Connecticut Constitution. &#8220;In sum, the state has failed to establish adequate reason to justify the statutory ban on same sex marriage,&#8221; said the court in a 4-3 decision. &#8220;Accordingly, under the equal protection provisions of the state constitution, our statutory scheme governing marriage cannot stand insofar as it bars same sex couples from marrying.&#8221;</p>
<p>Representatives of Minnesota&#8217;s LGBT community were pleased with the news, but quick to point out that the decision will have little to no impact on Minnesota.</p>
<p>OutFront Minnesota staff attorney Phil Duran said, “This is a heartening decision that will have a real impact on families.”</p>
<p>Monica Meyer, OutFront&#8217;s public policy director, agreed, “The Connecticut Supreme Court ruling is still inspiring for all the same-sex couples in our state who desire to be lifelong companions and raise families. The court sent a message to the nation that fairness and equality are principles under our laws that should be upheld.”</p>
<p>In a press release, OutFront said, &#8220;Connecticut’s decision will not have a direct legal impact on Minnesota because state law bans same-sex marriages and prevents the state from recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minnesotaindependent.com/12678/connecticut-supreme-court-says-yes-to-same-sex-marriage/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

