<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. &#187; reprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/tag/reprint/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pioneer Press reprints discredited Wall Street Journal editorial on Senate race</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/22263/pioneer-press-reprints-discredited-wall-street-journal-editorial-on-senate-election</link>
		<comments>http://minnesotaindependent.com/22263/pioneer-press-reprints-discredited-wall-street-journal-editorial-on-senate-election#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Steller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pioneer Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tainted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undeserving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=22263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The St. Paul Pioneer Press sees fit today to run a Jan. 5 Wall Street Journal editorial on the Minnesota U.S. Senate recount that nearly everyone but Rush Limbaugh has laughed off for its woolly inaccuracies and hidebound misrepresentations. Does the PiPress editorial staff let stand the errors that their WSJ counterparts committed to print two days [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pipress-wsj-logos.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-22266" title="pipress-wsj-logos" src="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pipress-wsj-logos-300x45.jpg" alt="" width="280" /></a>The St. Paul <a href="http://www.twincities.com/opinion/ci_11388090">Pioneer Press sees fit</a> today to run a Jan. 5 <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123111967642552909.html">Wall Street Journal editorial</a> on the Minnesota U.S. Senate recount that <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/22045/wall-street-journal-rushes-to-aid-of-coleman">nearly everyone</a> but <a href="http://mediamatters.org/discuss/200901050016">Rush Limbaugh</a> has laughed off for its <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/did-wall-street-jorunal-fire-their-fact.html">woolly inaccuracies</a> and <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/22229/wsj-recount-editorial-prompts-non-meek-response-from-judge-cleary">hidebound misrepresentations</a>. Does the PiPress editorial staff let stand the errors that their WSJ counterparts committed to print two days ago? No sir, they make corrections — adding a comma here, unitalicizing a familiar foreign phrase there, and (perhaps most boldly) changing an initial letter S in &#8220;Senator&#8221; to lower case.<span id="more-22263"></span></p>
<p>With those fixes made and one no-longer-timely sentence dispatched, the Pioneer Press set about breathing clean Minnesota air into a wheezy editorial from Wall Street for the (dubious) benefit of local readers, many of whom will see the column for what it is — tainted and undeserving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minnesotaindependent.com/22263/pioneer-press-reprints-discredited-wall-street-journal-editorial-on-senate-election/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
