<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. &#187; tainted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/tag/tainted/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pioneer Press reprints discredited Wall Street Journal editorial on Senate race</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/22263/pioneer-press-reprints-discredited-wall-street-journal-editorial-on-senate-election</link>
		<comments>http://minnesotaindependent.com/22263/pioneer-press-reprints-discredited-wall-street-journal-editorial-on-senate-election#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Steller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pioneer Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tainted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undeserving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=22263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The St. Paul Pioneer Press sees fit today to run a Jan. 5 Wall Street Journal editorial on the Minnesota U.S. Senate recount that nearly everyone but Rush Limbaugh has laughed off for its woolly inaccuracies and hidebound misrepresentations. Does the PiPress editorial staff let stand the errors that their WSJ counterparts committed to print two days [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pipress-wsj-logos.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-22266" title="pipress-wsj-logos" src="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pipress-wsj-logos-300x45.jpg" alt="" width="280" /></a>The St. Paul <a href="http://www.twincities.com/opinion/ci_11388090">Pioneer Press sees fit</a> today to run a Jan. 5 <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123111967642552909.html">Wall Street Journal editorial</a> on the Minnesota U.S. Senate recount that <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/22045/wall-street-journal-rushes-to-aid-of-coleman">nearly everyone</a> but <a href="http://mediamatters.org/discuss/200901050016">Rush Limbaugh</a> has laughed off for its <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/did-wall-street-jorunal-fire-their-fact.html">woolly inaccuracies</a> and <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/22229/wsj-recount-editorial-prompts-non-meek-response-from-judge-cleary">hidebound misrepresentations</a>. Does the PiPress editorial staff let stand the errors that their WSJ counterparts committed to print two days ago? No sir, they make corrections — adding a comma here, unitalicizing a familiar foreign phrase there, and (perhaps most boldly) changing an initial letter S in &#8220;Senator&#8221; to lower case.<span id="more-22263"></span></p>
<p>With those fixes made and one no-longer-timely sentence dispatched, the Pioneer Press set about breathing clean Minnesota air into a wheezy editorial from Wall Street for the (dubious) benefit of local readers, many of whom will see the column for what it is — tainted and undeserving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minnesotaindependent.com/22263/pioneer-press-reprints-discredited-wall-street-journal-editorial-on-senate-election/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DFL talk of &#8216;proper&#8217; recount makes prominent Republican sick</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/16962/dfl-talk-of-proper-recount-makes-republican-sick</link>
		<comments>http://minnesotaindependent.com/16962/dfl-talk-of-proper-recount-makes-republican-sick#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Steller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Almanac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cullen Sheehan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountain iron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics In Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[properly counted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah janacek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tainted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tpt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=16962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heard beneath Friday's hubbub over the vote count in Mountain Iron, Minn., was the advancement of a related Republican argument -- that by offering reasons why a recount in the U.S. Senate election should go forward Democrats are insulting Minnesota's election system and its election officials. What was implicit in U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman's remarks Nov. 5, prominent Republican commentator Sarah Janecek made explicit Nov. 7, first by writing that when Democrats say they want to "ensure votes properly cast are properly counted," they're really out to "smear our elections process." Later, she told a public television audience, "I'm pretty sickened by that." In the meantime, Coleman's campaign manager applied words like "dubious" and "tainted" to the current canvassing process.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/janacek-still.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-16963" title="janacek-still" src="http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/janacek-still-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Heard beneath Friday&#8217;s <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/16942/100-vote-spike-for-franken-human-not-mechanical-error">hubbub over the vote count in Mountain Iron, Minn.</a>, was the advancement of a related Republican argument &#8212; that by offering reasons why a recount in the U.S. Senate election contest between Democrat Al Franken and Republican U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman should go forward, Democrats are insulting Minnesota&#8217;s election system and its election officials.</p>
<p>What was implicit in U.S. Sen. <a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/polinaut/archive/2008/11/recount_day_1.shtml">Norm Coleman&#8217;s remarks</a> Wednesday, prominent Republican commentator Sarah Janecek made explicit Friday, first by writing that when Democrats say they want to &#8220;ensure votes properly cast are properly counted,&#8221; they&#8217;re really out to &#8220;smear our elections process.&#8221; Later she told a public television audience, &#8220;I&#8217;m pretty sickened by that.&#8221; In the meantime, Coleman&#8217;s campaign manager applied words like &#8220;dubious&#8221; and &#8220;tainted&#8221; to the current canvassing process.  <span id="more-16962"></span></p>
<p>In an article for her <a href="http://www.politicsinminnesota.com/2008/nov07/1381/frankly-rich-franken-v-ritchie">Politics in Minnesota Weekly Report</a>, publisher Janecek wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>The outsider ethos that has plagued <strong>Al Franken</strong> since the inception of his candidacy two years ago now manifests itself in an even uglier fashion: casting doubt on Minnesota&#8217;s election process. &#8230; Franken and the DFL Party are not entitled to, at best, cast doubt on our process, or worse, create chaos. The PR and legal strategy appears to hang on &#8220;properly cast votes properly counted.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Here Janecek cites Franken&#8217;s and five other DFLers&#8217; use of the offending phrase, &#8220;ensure properly cast votes are properly counted.&#8221; She continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve talked to a number of rank-and-file election judges (from both parties) this week and they feel insulted. These people volunteer their time year after year to do the Good Neighbor thing at the polls. To smear our elections process is to smear them, they believe.</p></blockquote>
<p>Later Friday Janecek made one of her frequent appearances on <a href="http://www.tpt.org/almanac/index.html">TPT&#8217;s weekly &#8220;Almanac&#8221; show</a>, where she said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I really dread this entire process. Minnesota &#8212; highest voter turnout in the nation. We&#8217;re known for our clean elections. And you look at the rhetoric that&#8217;s coming from the Franken campaign about improper elections, improper votes cast, and it just &#8212; I&#8217;m sickened. I think in large part &#8212; Secretary Ritchie flagged this earlier &#8212; we have good people running our elections. So I&#8217;m pretty sickened by that.</p></blockquote>
<p>This on a day when <a href="http://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2008/11/07/4474/pre-recount_norms_troops_make_hay_of_mountain_iron">Coleman&#8217;s campaign manager, Cullen Sheehan, said</a> in a press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Minnesota has a history of fair and clean elections, and we are committed to ensuring that this election is no different.  That is why it is so troubling to us that &#8230;<strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">statistically dubious and improbable shifts &#8230; are overwhelmingly accruing to the benefit of Al Franken. </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">And, as many of these unexplained and improbably vote swings are taking place on the Iron Range, we’re asking that local and state election officials provide us with the necessary data to reassure the public that the canvassing process has not been tainted.</span></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>If the Democrats&#8217; phrase &#8220;ensure votes properly cast are properly counted&#8221; is enough to make Republicans ill, then the Coleman camp&#8217;s words &#8212; &#8220;troubling,&#8221; &#8220;dubious,&#8221; &#8220;unexplained,&#8221; &#8220;improbably&#8221; and &#8220;tainted&#8221; &#8212; must have pushed them way beyond Minute Clinic-sick.</p>
<p>The question is whether words &#8212; whatever their political stripe, emotional pang or medical impact &#8212; will distract Minnesotans and their public officials from seeing the electoral system through a professional and impartial recount process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minnesotaindependent.com/16962/dfl-talk-of-proper-recount-makes-republican-sick/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
